【摘要】： 對于司法鑒定問題的研究以及重新審視,對于司法鑒定制度存在弊端的實(shí)證分析,對于造成錯案、冤案的教訓(xùn)根源反思,能為司法鑒定制度改革的走向提供前車之鑒。鑒定制度改革當(dāng)何以為進(jìn)路,是引進(jìn)英美法系的證人制度予以“轉(zhuǎn)彎”,還是改進(jìn)原有訴訟程序中的司法鑒定構(gòu)造予以“直行”,是我國目前司法鑒定制度改革無法回避的問題。2005年2月28日,十屆全國人大常委會第十四次會議通過的《司法鑒定管理問題的決定》(以下簡稱《決定》)已于2005年10月1日起正式實(shí)施�！稕Q定》明確規(guī)定,人民法院和司法行政部門不得設(shè)立鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)。根據(jù)司法鑒定活動的性質(zhì),除偵查機(jī)關(guān)為偵查犯罪提供技術(shù)鑒定支持在內(nèi)部設(shè)立的鑒定部門外,其他從事司法鑒定的機(jī)構(gòu)都應(yīng)是獨(dú)立享有權(quán)利和承擔(dān)義務(wù)的社會服務(wù)性組織。這是我國司法鑒定體制的一次重大改革,《決定》通過后對我國原有的司法鑒定格局產(chǎn)生重大影響。筆者試圖通過對司法鑒定啟動權(quán)、重新鑒定、鑒定結(jié)論質(zhì)證三個問題的思考,為我國司法鑒定體制的立法提供微薄之力。
[Abstract]:The study and re-examination of the problem of judicial expertise, the empirical analysis of the shortcomings of the judicial expertise system, the reflection on the causes of the wrong cases and the lessons of the injustice cases, can provide a lesson for the reform of the judicial expertise system. Why should the reform of the appraisal system be carried out? should the witness system of common law system be introduced to "turn", or should the judicial identification structure in the original litigation procedure be improved to be "directly carried out"? Is the current judicial expertise system reform can not be evaded. February 28, 2005, The decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise (hereinafter referred to as "the decision"), adopted by the 14th session of the Tenth National people's Congress standing Committee (hereinafter referred to as "the decision"), has been formally implemented since October 1, 2005. The people's court and the judicial administrative department shall not set up an appraisal organ. According to the nature of judicial expertise activities, except for the technical identification support provided by investigative organs for the investigation of crimes, the other institutions engaged in judicial expertise should be independent social service organizations which enjoy rights and undertake obligations. This is a major reform of the judicial expertise system in our country. After the adoption of the decision, it has a great impact on the original pattern of judicial expertise in our country. The author tries to provide a meagre force for the legislation of the judicial expertise system by thinking of three problems: the right to start the judicial identification, the reappraisal and the cross-examination of the appraisal conclusion.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：吉林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號】：D926;D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 項(xiàng)勇;徐純厚;;淺議刑事司法鑒定應(yīng)完善的幾個問題[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬);2012年06期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李盼盼;論我國人身傷殘鑒定制度的完善[D];燕山大學(xué);2012年

2 沈文征;論我國司法鑒定啟動程序的適用與完善[D];蘇州大學(xué);2011年

3 李艷超;刑事司法鑒定啟動程序研究[D];吉林大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2236554