【摘要】：文章采用個(gè)案分析的方法闡釋了我國警察行業(yè)的幾對(duì)基本的道德爭(zhēng)議和倫理兩難。我國“110”報(bào)警服務(wù)臺(tái)實(shí)行“四有四必”之后,在廣受歡迎、深得民心的同時(shí),也遭遇了進(jìn)退兩難的尷尬:面對(duì)大量的搔擾和求助等非警務(wù)電話,是信守“有求必應(yīng)”的承諾而繼續(xù)承受似乎“份外”的重負(fù),還是放棄承諾專注“份內(nèi)”之事?什么是警察的“份內(nèi)”職責(zé),什么是“份外”的?什么是“為人民服務(wù)”,“為人民服務(wù)”與個(gè)別化服務(wù)之間的關(guān)系如何?如何取舍群眾的萬能化期望與警察職業(yè)的專業(yè)化發(fā)展之間的矛盾?關(guān)于這些問題的道德爭(zhēng)議,引發(fā)了警察職業(yè)倫理的困惑與兩難。
[Abstract]:This paper explains several basic moral disputes and ethical dilemmas in China's police industry by case study. After China's "110" alarm desk implemented "four things and four necessities", it was popular and popular, but it also encountered an awkward dilemma: it faced a large number of non-police phone calls, such as harassment and help. Should we keep the promise of "doing what we seek" and continue to bear the burden that seems to be "extra", or should we give up the promise to focus on the "within"? What is the "duty" of the police, what is "extra"? What is the relationship between "serving the people" and "serving the people" and individualized services? How to choose the contradiction between the omnipotent expectations of the masses and the professional development of the police profession? The moral controversy about these problems has caused the confusion and dilemma of police professional ethics.
【作者單位】：
【基金】：國家社科基金項(xiàng)目《公共行政中的道德悖論與倫理困境:案例研究》(03CZZ007)的中期成果之一
【分類號(hào)】：D631.1
，

本文編號(hào)：2211894