【摘要】：“靜態(tài)痕跡”中的“靜態(tài)”二字 ,絕非“靜止?fàn)顟B(tài)”之含義 ,它乃是工具痕跡學(xué)從日常詞語(yǔ)中移植過(guò)來(lái)的一個(gè)借代詞�！皠�(dòng)態(tài)痕跡”與“靜態(tài)痕跡”的最顯著區(qū)別便是這兩類痕跡中由于兩客體之間相對(duì)位移量的不同而形成的痕跡特征差異�！耙宰饔昧Ψ较騾^(qū)分線形痕跡及凹陷痕跡”的分類方法不論在理論上還是在實(shí)踐上均存在許多問(wèn)題。對(duì)于將工具痕跡劃分為“單一型和復(fù)合型”兩大類 ,“單一型痕跡中既包括線條狀痕跡又包括凹陷狀痕跡 ,復(fù)合型痕跡是單一型痕跡中兩種痕跡并存的痕跡”的分類方法 ,筆者持不贊同的態(tài)度。
[Abstract]:The word "static" in "static trace" is not the meaning of "static state". It is a metonym transplanted from everyday words by tool trace. The most significant difference between "dynamic trace" and "static trace" is the difference of trace characteristics between the two kinds of trace due to the difference of relative displacement between the two objects. There are many problems in the classification method of "distinguishing linear marks from indentation marks by force direction", both in theory and in practice. For the classification of tool marks into "single type" and "compound type", "single type marks include both line marks and indented marks," The author disagrees that compound trace is a classification method in which two kinds of trace exist side by side in single type trace.
【作者單位】： 甘肅政法學(xué)院公安分院!甘肅蘭州730070
【分類號(hào)】：D918
，

本文編號(hào)：2196839