【摘要】： 謊言識別一直是西方法學(xué)界和心理學(xué)界研究的熱點和焦點問題。在刑事詢問筆錄中,證人供述的真實性或虛假性對于能否成功破案及證據(jù)能否被法庭采納具有至關(guān)重要的作用。在中國的刑事詢問階段,使用一種操作性較強的手段進(jìn)行謊言識別或真實鑒定尤為重要。但是,國內(nèi)鮮有研究者通過語言手段進(jìn)行謊言識別研究�；谇叭说难芯砍晒�,本研究以敘事分析法為研究手段,旨在探討法律背景下中文刑事詢問筆錄的語言和結(jié)構(gòu)特點,進(jìn)而探討識別真實或虛假的幾個語言線索,以期對以后的司法實踐和法律語言研究具有前瞻性價值。根據(jù)前人的研究成果,本研究提出了用于中文刑事詢問筆錄的識別謊言或證明真實的八個語言線索,其中四個線索假定為虛假陳述中最常出現(xiàn)的語言線索,另外四個假定為真實陳述中最頻繁出現(xiàn)的語言線索。通過例證及對比案例分析,本研究詳細(xì)闡述了這八個假定的語言線索。統(tǒng)計分析則進(jìn)一步檢驗了這些語言線索在中文詢問筆錄中出現(xiàn)的頻率。一方面,統(tǒng)計結(jié)果顯示,在鑒定真實筆錄的四個語言線索中,連貫性最為重要,但案情細(xì)節(jié)的數(shù)量及獨特的感官細(xì)節(jié)在真實性筆錄中也非常重要。另一方面,在識別虛假筆錄的四個語言線索中,否認(rèn)性話語是虛假筆錄最為明顯的特征,模糊性話語和開場白長度則居于次要地位。因此,六個最頻繁出現(xiàn)的語言線索——連貫性,細(xì)節(jié)的數(shù)量,獨特的感官特征,否定性話語,模糊性話語及開場白長度——可用于識別研究和相關(guān)的司法實踐。在詢問證人的階段,警方可特別關(guān)注上述六個語言線索,這對于盡快破案具有一定作用。然而,在從事本研究過程中,筆者遇到了很多困難,由于中國司法實踐過程中刑事詢問筆錄的嚴(yán)格保密性,語料的搜集是研究遇到的最大困難之一。盡管筆者已經(jīng)盡最大努力去克服這些局限性,但由于有限的資源和語料搜集渠道,語料的種類和數(shù)量仍然不能使人滿意,這對于研究結(jié)果的客觀性將有一定的不良影響。因此,筆肯迫切期望本研究能拋磚引玉,期待以后的研究者能夠突破這個局限性,在該領(lǐng)域做出更大貢獻(xiàn),以推動法律語言學(xué)在中國司法實踐中的進(jìn)一步應(yīng)用。
[Abstract]:Lie recognition has always been a hot topic and focus in western legal and psychological circles. In the record of criminal interrogation, the authenticity or falsehood of the witness's statement plays an important role in successfully solving the case and whether the evidence can be accepted by the court. In China's criminal interrogation stage, it is very important to use an operational method to identify lies or identify the truth. However, there are few researchers in China who use language to identify lies. Based on the previous research results, this study aims to explore the linguistic and structural characteristics of Chinese criminal interrogation records under the legal background by means of narrative analysis, and then to identify several linguistic clues that are true or false. With a view to the future judicial practice and legal language research has a forward-looking value. Based on the results of previous studies, this study proposes eight linguistic cues to identify lies or prove truth in Chinese criminal interrogation notes, four of which are assumed to be the most common linguistic clues in false statements. The other four are assumed to be the most frequent linguistic cues in true statements. Through illustrations and comparative case studies, this study illustrates the eight hypothetical linguistic cues in detail. The statistical analysis further examined the frequency of these linguistic cues in Chinese interrogations. On the one hand, the statistical results show that coherence is the most important of the four linguistic cues in identifying the true record, but the quantity of the details of the case and the unique sensory details are also very important in the authenticity record. On the other hand, among the four linguistic cues to identify false records, denial is the most obvious feature, while the fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line are of secondary importance. Therefore, the six most frequent linguistic cues-coherence, the number of details, unique sensory characteristics, negative discourse, fuzzy discourse and the length of the opening line-can be used to identify research and relevant judicial practices. In the stage of witness questioning, the police can pay special attention to the above six linguistic clues, which is helpful to solve the case as soon as possible. However, in the course of this study, the author has encountered a lot of difficulties. Due to the strict confidentiality of criminal interrogation records in the judicial practice in China, the collection of corpus is one of the biggest difficulties encountered in the study. Although the author has tried his best to overcome these limitations, due to the limited resources and data collection channels, the variety and quantity of the data are still not satisfactory, which will have a certain negative impact on the objectivity of the research results. Therefore, pen Ken urgently hopes that this study will lead to the future researchers can break through this limitation and make more contributions in this field, in order to promote the further application of forensic linguistics in Chinese judicial practice.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D918.5

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會議論文 前2條

1 鄭熠;;對犯罪嫌疑人謊言識別初探[A];第十一屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會議論文摘要集[C];2007年

2 張寧;張亭玉;張雨青;吳坎坎;;中國人對說謊行為和謊言識別的信念及其群體差異[A];第十二屆全國心理學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];2009年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 毛春香;論刑事訊問筆錄中虛假陳述的識別[D];廣東外語外貿(mào)大學(xué);2008年

2 牟冬蓮;情緒對謊言識別和信任影響的研究[D];西北師范大學(xué);2009年

3 劉一丹;語言視角下的欺騙識別研究[D];西南大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：2156394