論我國司法鑒定制度的構(gòu)建與完善
發(fā)布時間:2018-07-27 17:51
【摘要】:司法鑒定是在訴訟活動中鑒定人運用科學(xué)技術(shù)或者專門知識對訴訟涉及的專門性問題進(jìn)行鑒別和判斷并提供鑒定意見的活動。2005年10月1日《全國人大常委會關(guān)于司法鑒定管理問題的決定》頒布實施,,確立了統(tǒng)一管理和規(guī)范司法鑒定活動的制度,相對地改善了司法鑒定管理體制混亂的局面。構(gòu)建我國的司法鑒定制度,一方面要拓展《決定》的管理范圍,將各類鑒定活動根據(jù)訴訟需要納入調(diào)整范圍,使這些司法鑒定活動有法可循;另一方面要切實貫徹《決定》,以《決定》為框架,構(gòu)建我國的司法鑒定制度,基本包括司法鑒定人、司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)、司法鑒定程序、司法鑒定意見這四大方面。司法鑒定人的科學(xué)管理,鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)的規(guī)范調(diào)控,鑒定程序的正當(dāng)公開,鑒定意見的公正可信這四個方面共同構(gòu)成了我國司法鑒定的基本制度框架。通過協(xié)調(diào)司法鑒定的管理、實施和應(yīng)用之間的關(guān)系,形成由司法行政機(jī)關(guān)有效管理,鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)人員科學(xué)鑒定,人民法院中立裁決組成的良好鑒定秩序,才能全面地促進(jìn)司法鑒定制度的改革,實現(xiàn)構(gòu)建和完善我國司法鑒定制度的目標(biāo)。
[Abstract]:Judicial expertise is an activity in which experts use science and technology or expertise to identify and judge the specialized issues involved in the proceedings and provide expert opinions. On October 1, 2005, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC) Decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, promulgated and implemented, The system of unified management and standardization of judicial expertise has been established, and the chaotic situation of judicial expertise management system has been improved. To construct the judicial expertise system of our country, on the one hand, we should expand the management scope of "decision", bring all kinds of appraisal activities into the scope of adjustment according to the need of litigation, and make these judicial expertise activities have laws to follow; On the other hand, it is necessary to carry out the "decision" conscientiously, and to set up the system of judicial expertise in our country under the framework of "decision", which basically includes four aspects: judicial appraiser, judicial identification institution, judicial identification procedure and judicial expertise opinion. Four aspects: the scientific management of judicial experts, the normative regulation and control of appraisal institutions, the proper publicity of appraisal procedures and the fairness and credibility of appraisal opinions constitute the basic institutional framework of judicial expertise in China. Through the coordination of the relationship between the administration, implementation and application of judicial expertise, a good appraisal order consisting of the effective management of judicial administrative organs, the scientific appraisal of personnel of appraisal institutions, and the neutral ruling of the people's courts is formed. Only then can we promote the reform of the judicial expertise system and realize the goal of constructing and perfecting the judicial expertise system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2007
【分類號】:D926;D918.9
本文編號:2148675
[Abstract]:Judicial expertise is an activity in which experts use science and technology or expertise to identify and judge the specialized issues involved in the proceedings and provide expert opinions. On October 1, 2005, the standing Committee of the National people's Congress (NPC) Decision on the Administration of Forensic expertise, promulgated and implemented, The system of unified management and standardization of judicial expertise has been established, and the chaotic situation of judicial expertise management system has been improved. To construct the judicial expertise system of our country, on the one hand, we should expand the management scope of "decision", bring all kinds of appraisal activities into the scope of adjustment according to the need of litigation, and make these judicial expertise activities have laws to follow; On the other hand, it is necessary to carry out the "decision" conscientiously, and to set up the system of judicial expertise in our country under the framework of "decision", which basically includes four aspects: judicial appraiser, judicial identification institution, judicial identification procedure and judicial expertise opinion. Four aspects: the scientific management of judicial experts, the normative regulation and control of appraisal institutions, the proper publicity of appraisal procedures and the fairness and credibility of appraisal opinions constitute the basic institutional framework of judicial expertise in China. Through the coordination of the relationship between the administration, implementation and application of judicial expertise, a good appraisal order consisting of the effective management of judicial administrative organs, the scientific appraisal of personnel of appraisal institutions, and the neutral ruling of the people's courts is formed. Only then can we promote the reform of the judicial expertise system and realize the goal of constructing and perfecting the judicial expertise system in our country.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:內(nèi)蒙古大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2007
【分類號】:D926;D918.9
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 陳英慧;論鑒定結(jié)論的質(zhì)證[J];長春理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2005年02期
2 熊秋紅;我國司法鑒定體制之重構(gòu)[J];法商研究;2004年03期
3 楊立云,張繼成;司法鑒定科學(xué)性之反思[J];法商研究;2004年04期
4 馬建平;;淺議警方鑒定人出庭作證[J];法學(xué)雜志;2006年02期
5 劉瑛;鑒定結(jié)論的審查判斷之比較研究[J];河南社會科學(xué);2005年02期
6 奉曉政;;司法鑒定結(jié)論采信問題研究[J];廣西社會科學(xué);2006年02期
7 徐思;試論司法鑒定法律援助的緊迫性和必要性[J];中國司法鑒定;2003年02期
8 卞建林,郭志媛;規(guī)范司法鑒定程序之立法勢在必行[J];中國司法鑒定;2005年04期
9 施敏,黃曉華;構(gòu)建我國司法鑒定人出庭作證制度[J];中國司法鑒定;2005年05期
10 唐磊;陳利紅;;論鑒定結(jié)論的質(zhì)證[J];中國司法鑒定;2005年06期
本文編號:2148675
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/gongan/2148675.html
教材專著