本文選題：民事 + 司法��； 參考：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 鑒定結(jié)論是民事訴訟中一類重要的法定證據(jù)形式，隨著科技的不斷進(jìn)步，鑒定結(jié)論在民事訴訟中的運(yùn)用越來越廣，在司法實(shí)踐中的作用也越來越重要。鑒定人作為司法鑒定活動(dòng)的具體實(shí)施者，其制度設(shè)計(jì)與實(shí)施情況在很大程度上影響著法院對(duì)民事案件尤其是涉及高科技以及需運(yùn)用科技手段解決的案件如環(huán)境污染、醫(yī)療事故、藥物作用、交通事故等新型糾紛的正確處理，并關(guān)系到民事司法改革的進(jìn)程，因此司法鑒定人制度引起了筆者的濃厚興趣和深切關(guān)注。筆者以此作為自己學(xué)位論文研究的題目，就司法鑒定人制度中的相關(guān)內(nèi)容進(jìn)行了研究，歷經(jīng)幾個(gè)月，終于形成了這篇論文。 本文共分六大章，約四萬(wàn)余字。 第一章是司法鑒定人制度的概論。由于概念是某一學(xué)科入門的先導(dǎo)，因此筆者從司法鑒定人的概念出發(fā)，先后介紹了兩大法系學(xué)者和我國(guó)的專家對(duì)司法鑒定人概念的認(rèn)識(shí)，并闡明出筆者個(gè)人的見解，從而為全文各個(gè)部分的論述奠定了基石。 第二章是司法鑒定人的訴訟地位。在本章中，筆者對(duì)比研究了兩大法系中司法鑒定人的訴訟地位，并在考察中國(guó)現(xiàn)狀的基礎(chǔ)上，主張應(yīng)順應(yīng)兩大法系互相融合、互相借鑒的趨勢(shì)，建立起交叉詢問等機(jī)制保障司法鑒定人成為真正獨(dú)立的、客觀、中立的訴訟參與人。 第三章是司法鑒定人的資格。本章著重介紹了兩大法系中司法鑒定人的法律資格：即英美國(guó)家的“無固定資格制”和德法等國(guó)的“固定資格制”。針對(duì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人資格制度中存在的問題，筆者主張：取消法院內(nèi)部的鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)；建立鑒定人名冊(cè)制度；建立鑒定人交流、培訓(xùn)及考核獎(jiǎng)懲制度；制定全國(guó)統(tǒng)一的鑒定人資格制度，，提高司法鑒定準(zhǔn)入領(lǐng)域的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)化和規(guī)范化等等。 第四章是司法鑒定人的選任制度。同樣，筆者也是運(yùn)用了對(duì)比研究的方法，通過觀察兩大法系中不同的司法鑒定人選任制度的優(yōu)劣，主張我國(guó)司法鑒定人選任制改革的方向應(yīng)是建立“以法官選任為主、當(dāng)事人選任為輔”的模式。 第五章是司法鑒定人的權(quán)利義務(wù)。司法鑒定人的權(quán)利義務(wù)不僅是司法鑒定人公正和有效率的開展鑒定工作的前提，也是實(shí)現(xiàn)訴訟程序民主公正及實(shí)體結(jié) WP=4 果公平合理的保障。在本章中，筆者先后介紹了大陸法系和英美法系中司法鑒定人的權(quán)利義務(wù)，并在此基礎(chǔ)上，對(duì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人的權(quán)利義務(wù)進(jìn)行了重新構(gòu)建。提出應(yīng)對(duì)司法鑒定人增加更多、更全面的權(quán)利義務(wù)方面的配套規(guī)定，以保障民事訴訟中公正、效率等價(jià)值目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn)。 第六章是司法鑒定人的法律責(zé)任。在本章中，筆者首先著重論述了司法鑒定人民事責(zé)任的性質(zhì)。指出在不同的法系司法鑒定人民事責(zé)任的性質(zhì)是不同的：在英美法系為契約責(zé)任，在大陸法系為侵權(quán)責(zé)任。其次，筆者針對(duì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人法律責(zé)任缺失的現(xiàn)狀，主張應(yīng)重新設(shè)計(jì)我國(guó)司法鑒定人的責(zé)任體系：即建立起多層次、有保障的新型責(zé)任體系。通過事前預(yù)防和事后救助的方式保障司法鑒定人只根據(jù)客觀事實(shí)和科學(xué)規(guī)律公正執(zhí)業(yè)。
[Abstract]:The appraisal conclusion is a kind of important legal evidence form in civil litigation . With the continuous progress of science and technology , the application of the appraisal conclusion in civil litigation is more and more important .









This article is divided into six chapters , about 40,000 words .









The first chapter is an overview of the system of judicial appraisal . Since the concept is the leader of a certain subject , the author introduces two major legal scholars and experts of our country from the concept of judicial appraisal , and expounds the author ' s personal opinion , thus laying the foundation for the discussion of the whole part of the whole text .









In the second chapter , the author compares the status of the judicial appraisal in the two systems . On the basis of investigating the present situation of China , the author argues that it should conform to the trend of mutual integration and mutual reference between the two methods , and establish a cross - inquiry mechanism to guarantee that the judicial identifying person becomes a truly independent , objective and neutral litigation participant .









The third chapter is the qualification of judicial appraisal . This chapter emphatically introduces the legal qualification of judicial appraisal in the two legal systems : the " fixed qualification system " and " fixed qualification system " in Anglo - American countries . In view of the problems existing in the qualification system of judicial appraisal in China , the author advocates that the appraisal institution inside the court is lifted ;
( d ) Establish a roster system ;
Establish an expert exchange , training and assessment and punishment system ;
The establishment of a national unified accreditation system , standardization and standardization in the field of access to judicial expertise , etc .









In the fourth chapter , the author also applies the method of comparative study . By observing the advantages and disadvantages of different judicial appraisal system in the two systems , it is suggested that the direction of selecting the system reform should be based on the selection of judges as the main and the choice of the parties as auxiliary " .









The fifth chapter is the rights and obligations of the judicial identifying people . The rights and obligations of the judicial identifying persons are not only the premise of the judicial appraisal of the impartiality and the efficiency of the judicial authentication , but also the realization of the democratic justice and the entity knot of the proceedings .









WP=4










In this chapter , the author has introduced the rights and obligations of the judicial experts in the civil law system and the Anglo - American law system . On the basis of this , the author rebuilds the rights and obligations of the judicial certifier in our country .









Chapter 6 is the legal responsibility of judicial appraisal . In this chapter , the author first discusses the nature of the civil liability of judicial appraisal .
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2003
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張建華;司法鑒定人權(quán)責(zé)制度：梳理、評(píng)析與完善[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

2 孫菲;民事司法鑒定制度探研[D];中國(guó)政法大學(xué);2010年

3 蔡開劍;試論完善我國(guó)司法鑒定人的權(quán)利與義務(wù)制度[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

本文編號(hào)：2099064