本文選題：民事 + 司法��； 參考：《中國政法大學》2003年碩士論文

【摘要】： 鑒定結論是民事訴訟中一類重要的法定證據(jù)形式，隨著科技的不斷進步，鑒定結論在民事訴訟中的運用越來越廣，在司法實踐中的作用也越來越重要。鑒定人作為司法鑒定活動的具體實施者，其制度設計與實施情況在很大程度上影響著法院對民事案件尤其是涉及高科技以及需運用科技手段解決的案件如環(huán)境污染、醫(yī)療事故、藥物作用、交通事故等新型糾紛的正確處理，并關系到民事司法改革的進程，因此司法鑒定人制度引起了筆者的濃厚興趣和深切關注。筆者以此作為自己學位論文研究的題目，就司法鑒定人制度中的相關內(nèi)容進行了研究，歷經(jīng)幾個月，終于形成了這篇論文。 本文共分六大章，約四萬余字。 第一章是司法鑒定人制度的概論。由于概念是某一學科入門的先導，因此筆者從司法鑒定人的概念出發(fā)，先后介紹了兩大法系學者和我國的專家對司法鑒定人概念的認識，并闡明出筆者個人的見解，從而為全文各個部分的論述奠定了基石。 第二章是司法鑒定人的訴訟地位。在本章中，筆者對比研究了兩大法系中司法鑒定人的訴訟地位，并在考察中國現(xiàn)狀的基礎上，主張應順應兩大法系互相融合、互相借鑒的趨勢，建立起交叉詢問等機制保障司法鑒定人成為真正獨立的、客觀、中立的訴訟參與人。 第三章是司法鑒定人的資格。本章著重介紹了兩大法系中司法鑒定人的法律資格：即英美國家的“無固定資格制”和德法等國的“固定資格制”。針對我國司法鑒定人資格制度中存在的問題，筆者主張：取消法院內(nèi)部的鑒定機構；建立鑒定人名冊制度；建立鑒定人交流、培訓及考核獎懲制度；制定全國統(tǒng)一的鑒定人資格制度，，提高司法鑒定準入領域的標準化和規(guī)范化等等。 第四章是司法鑒定人的選任制度。同樣，筆者也是運用了對比研究的方法，通過觀察兩大法系中不同的司法鑒定人選任制度的優(yōu)劣，主張我國司法鑒定人選任制改革的方向應是建立“以法官選任為主、當事人選任為輔”的模式。 第五章是司法鑒定人的權利義務。司法鑒定人的權利義務不僅是司法鑒定人公正和有效率的開展鑒定工作的前提，也是實現(xiàn)訴訟程序民主公正及實體結 WP=4 果公平合理的保障。在本章中，筆者先后介紹了大陸法系和英美法系中司法鑒定人的權利義務，并在此基礎上，對我國司法鑒定人的權利義務進行了重新構建。提出應對司法鑒定人增加更多、更全面的權利義務方面的配套規(guī)定，以保障民事訴訟中公正、效率等價值目標的實現(xiàn)。 第六章是司法鑒定人的法律責任。在本章中，筆者首先著重論述了司法鑒定人民事責任的性質。指出在不同的法系司法鑒定人民事責任的性質是不同的：在英美法系為契約責任，在大陸法系為侵權責任。其次，筆者針對我國司法鑒定人法律責任缺失的現(xiàn)狀，主張應重新設計我國司法鑒定人的責任體系：即建立起多層次、有保障的新型責任體系。通過事前預防和事后救助的方式保障司法鑒定人只根據(jù)客觀事實和科學規(guī)律公正執(zhí)業(yè)。
[Abstract]:The appraisal conclusion is a kind of important legal evidence form in civil litigation . With the continuous progress of science and technology , the application of the appraisal conclusion in civil litigation is more and more important .









This article is divided into six chapters , about 40,000 words .









The first chapter is an overview of the system of judicial appraisal . Since the concept is the leader of a certain subject , the author introduces two major legal scholars and experts of our country from the concept of judicial appraisal , and expounds the author ' s personal opinion , thus laying the foundation for the discussion of the whole part of the whole text .









In the second chapter , the author compares the status of the judicial appraisal in the two systems . On the basis of investigating the present situation of China , the author argues that it should conform to the trend of mutual integration and mutual reference between the two methods , and establish a cross - inquiry mechanism to guarantee that the judicial identifying person becomes a truly independent , objective and neutral litigation participant .









The third chapter is the qualification of judicial appraisal . This chapter emphatically introduces the legal qualification of judicial appraisal in the two legal systems : the " fixed qualification system " and " fixed qualification system " in Anglo - American countries . In view of the problems existing in the qualification system of judicial appraisal in China , the author advocates that the appraisal institution inside the court is lifted ;
( d ) Establish a roster system ;
Establish an expert exchange , training and assessment and punishment system ;
The establishment of a national unified accreditation system , standardization and standardization in the field of access to judicial expertise , etc .









In the fourth chapter , the author also applies the method of comparative study . By observing the advantages and disadvantages of different judicial appraisal system in the two systems , it is suggested that the direction of selecting the system reform should be based on the selection of judges as the main and the choice of the parties as auxiliary " .









The fifth chapter is the rights and obligations of the judicial identifying people . The rights and obligations of the judicial identifying persons are not only the premise of the judicial appraisal of the impartiality and the efficiency of the judicial authentication , but also the realization of the democratic justice and the entity knot of the proceedings .









WP=4










In this chapter , the author has introduced the rights and obligations of the judicial experts in the civil law system and the Anglo - American law system . On the basis of this , the author rebuilds the rights and obligations of the judicial certifier in our country .









Chapter 6 is the legal responsibility of judicial appraisal . In this chapter , the author first discusses the nature of the civil liability of judicial appraisal .
【學位授予單位】：中國政法大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2003
【分類號】：D918.9

【引證文獻】

相關碩士學位論文 前3條

1 張建華;司法鑒定人權責制度：梳理、評析與完善[D];中南大學;2007年

2 孫菲;民事司法鑒定制度探研[D];中國政法大學;2010年

3 蔡開劍;試論完善我國司法鑒定人的權利與義務制度[D];華東政法大學;2011年

本文編號：2099064