本文選題：毒品犯罪 + 誘惑偵查��； 參考：《蘇州大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 被人們稱為“幽靈、魔鬼”的毒品不僅嚴(yán)重摧殘人體的身心健康,誘發(fā)其他犯罪,危害社會(huì)治安,敗壞社會(huì)風(fēng)氣,而且給家庭和社會(huì)帶來(lái)一系列問(wèn)題。 毒品犯罪是典型的“無(wú)被害人”案件,隱蔽性極高。因此,毒品犯罪案件采用誘惑偵查是比較常見(jiàn),實(shí)踐證明也的確行之有效的偵查手段。誘惑偵查可以分為機(jī)會(huì)提供型誘惑偵查和犯意誘發(fā)型誘惑偵查。犯意誘發(fā)型誘惑偵查是對(duì)沒(méi)有犯罪意圖的人采取主動(dòng)積極的行為,強(qiáng)烈誘惑其實(shí)施犯罪。這種誘惑偵查突破了打擊犯罪的底線,嚴(yán)重侵害了公民的基本權(quán)利,在司法實(shí)踐中應(yīng)該斷然排除。而機(jī)會(huì)提供型誘惑偵查只是為有犯罪意圖的嫌疑人提供犯罪的機(jī)會(huì),使其犯罪充分暴露。這種誘惑偵查在國(guó)外被廣泛使用,是國(guó)家打擊隱蔽性極強(qiáng)、無(wú)被害人案件的有力手段,并沒(méi)有突破法律和道德的底線。借鑒世界各國(guó)的通用做法,并結(jié)合我國(guó)毒品犯罪的特點(diǎn)和日益嚴(yán)峻的毒品犯罪形勢(shì),誘惑偵查在我國(guó)毒品犯罪的偵查活動(dòng)中顯得尤為必要。當(dāng)然,采用誘惑偵查手段偵破的毒品犯罪案件的社會(huì)危害性與自然發(fā)生的毒品犯罪案件的社會(huì)危害性不能相提并論,在對(duì)被告人量刑時(shí)應(yīng)考慮該因素。 雖然誘惑偵查在司法實(shí)踐中得到了廣泛的運(yùn)用,但是我國(guó)的誘惑偵查仍處于無(wú)法可依的尷尬境地。筆者建議從誘惑偵查適用的案件范圍、適用的對(duì)象、實(shí)施的主體、適用的程序和行為方式以及違法使用誘惑偵查的法律救濟(jì)等方面進(jìn)行立法規(guī)制,使我國(guó)的誘惑偵查盡快納入法制軌道。
[Abstract]:The drugs which people call "ghost, devil" not only seriously destroy the physical and mental health of human body, induce other crimes, endanger public order, corrupt social atmosphere, but also bring a series of problems to family and society. Drug crime is a typical "no victim" case, with high concealment. Therefore, it is more common to use enticement investigation in drug crime cases, which is proved to be effective in practice. Temptation investigation can be divided into opportunity-providing type and criminal intention-inducing type. The inductive investigation of criminal intention is a kind of active and active behavior to the person without criminal intention, which strongly induces him to commit a crime. This kind of seductive investigation breaks through the bottom line of cracking down on crime and seriously infringes on citizens' basic rights, which should be ruled out in judicial practice. And the chance-providing temptation detection only provides the suspect with criminal intention the opportunity to commit a crime, making his crime fully exposed. This kind of enticement investigation is widely used in foreign countries. It is a powerful means for the state to crack down on hidden and victimless cases and does not break the bottom line of law and morality. Drawing lessons from the common practice of other countries in the world and combining the characteristics of drug crimes and the increasingly serious situation of drug crimes in our country, it is particularly necessary to seduce investigation in the investigation of drug crimes in our country. Of course, the social harmfulness of drug-related crime cases detected by means of enticement investigation cannot be compared with that of natural drug-related crime cases, and this factor should be taken into account when sentencing the defendants. Although the temptation investigation has been widely used in judicial practice, the temptation investigation in our country is still in an awkward situation that can not be relied upon. The author suggests that the scope of cases applicable to seduction investigation, the object of application, the subject of implementation, the applicable procedure and behavior mode, and the legal remedy for illegal use of temptation investigation should be regulated by legislation. So that our country's temptation to investigate as soon as possible into the track of the legal system.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：蘇州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D918.2;D917

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 文小華;毒品犯罪證據(jù)審查認(rèn)定若干問(wèn)題研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2009年

2 王欣鋒;控制下交付問(wèn)題研究[D];西南政法大學(xué);2009年

3 蔣宏偉;荊愛(ài)國(guó)運(yùn)輸毒品宣告無(wú)罪案的法律分析[D];蘭州大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2079210