本文選題：司法 + 鑒定人��； 參考：《西南政法大學(xué)》2002年碩士論文

【摘要】： 司法鑒定制度是司法制度的重要組成部分。當(dāng)前，司法公正理念的不斷深化，司法改革措施的不斷推進(jìn)，對我國司法鑒定工作提出了更高的要求，同時也為我國司法鑒定制度的改革開辟了更為廣闊的前景。鑒定人制度作為司法鑒定制度的核心，是改革的重中之重。作者在廣泛收集國內(nèi)外有關(guān)鑒定人制度資料的基礎(chǔ)上，從國外鑒定人制度入手，對鑒定人制度的各項(xiàng)內(nèi)容作了較為詳細(xì)的比較研究，以從中借鑒其先進(jìn)經(jīng)驗(yàn)，對我國鑒定人制度的改革作了有益探索。 本文約37000字，分為八個部分。 第一部分，司法鑒定人概述。本部分主要介紹了鑒定人的概念、法律特征及其分類等基本內(nèi)容。 第二部分，司法鑒定人的歷史考察。本部分主要介紹了鑒定人的歷史發(fā)展，分為三個階段介紹：萌芽時期，發(fā)展時期，現(xiàn)狀。 第三部分，司法鑒定人訴訟地位之比較研究。本部分主要分析了不同國家鑒定人的訴訟地位。英美法系國家鑒定人的訴訟地位為“證人”，大陸法系國家鑒定人的訴訟地位比證人高，為“法官的助手”，而我國的鑒定人則是獨(dú)立的訴訟參與人，并對此進(jìn)行了評價。 第四部分，司法鑒定人資格制度之比較研究。本部分是本文重點(diǎn)之一，主要分析了兩大法系國家鑒定人的資格和我國鑒定人資格現(xiàn)狀，在作了比較后，提出完善我國鑒定人資格制度之構(gòu)想。實(shí)行職業(yè)資格制和執(zhí)業(yè)資格制，著重闡述了鑒定人的條件和資格的取得、考核、培訓(xùn)、登記注冊等。 第五部分，司法鑒定人選任制度之比較研究。本部分主要分析了英美法系國家的當(dāng)事人委托鑒定制度和大陸法系國家的司法官委托鑒定制度，并結(jié)合我國訴訟制度，提出在我國應(yīng)建立司法機(jī)關(guān)委托鑒定為主，當(dāng)事人委托鑒定為補(bǔ)充的制度。 第六部分，司法鑒定人的權(quán)利義務(wù)比較研究。這部分主要介紹了大陸法系不同國家的鑒定人所享有的權(quán)利與義務(wù)，并分析了我國鑒定人士要應(yīng) 享有的權(quán)牙義務(wù)。 第七部分，司法鑒定人的法律責(zé)任之比酬究。蛐分主要獅了西 方國家鑒定人的法律責(zé)任，進(jìn)而提出完善我國鑒定人的法律責(zé)任，并對鑒 定人承擔(dān)法律責(zé)任的歸責(zé)原則及承擔(dān)法律責(zé)任的類型作了詳細(xì)論述。鑒定 人承擔(dān)的責(zé)任有：故意作虛假鑒定結(jié)論的法律責(zé)任；故意超期鑒定的法律 責(zé)任；故意或重大過失損毀、更換鑒定材料，造成嚴(yán)重后果的法律責(zé)任； 拒絕出庭作證的法律責(zé)任等。鑒定人主觀上須故意或重大過失才承擔(dān)責(zé)任， 類型有刑事責(zé)任、民事責(zé)任、行政責(zé)任等。 第／憫分，司法鑒定人制度立法之比狽究。本部分詳細(xì)闡述了我國 目前鑒定人的立法狀況，在樹國外有關(guān)鑒定人立法的擲上，提出我國 應(yīng)由全國人大或常委會制定統(tǒng)一的《司法賑法兄以規(guī)范鑒定人的各項(xiàng)制 度。
[Abstract]:The judicial authentication system is an important part of the judicial system. At present, the continuous deepening of the concept of judicial justice and the continuous promotion of judicial reform measures have put forward higher requirements for the judicial identification work in our country, but also open up a wider prospect for the reform of our judicial authentication system. The appraiser system is a judicial authentication system. The core of the reform is the top priority of the reform. On the basis of the extensive collection of information about the appraiser system both at home and abroad, the author makes a comparatively detailed comparative study of the various contents of the appraiser system from the foreign appraiser system, so as to make a useful exploration for the reform of the system of appraisers in China from the reference of its advanced experience.
This article is about 37000 words and is divided into eight parts.
The first part is an overview of forensic experts. This part mainly introduces the concept, characteristics and classification of appraisers.
The second part, the historical investigation of the judicial appraiser. This part mainly introduces the historical development of the appraiser, which is divided into three stages: the period of germination, the period of development, and the present situation.
The third part, the comparative study of the judicial status of the judicial authenticator. This part mainly analyzes the status of the litigant in different countries. The legal status of the appraisers in the Anglo American legal system is "witness", the civil law country is higher than the witness and is "the help of the judge", and the appraiser of our country is an independent lawsuit. The participants were evaluated.
The fourth part is the comparative study of the qualification system of the judicial authenticator. This part is one of the key points of this article. It mainly analyzes the qualification of the appraisers in the two legal system countries and the status quo of the qualification of the appraisers in our country. After making a comparison, it puts forward the conception of perfecting the qualification system of the appraisers in our country. The qualification system of vocational education and the system of professional qualification are carried out, and the appraisal is emphatically expounded. People's conditions and qualifications, assessment, training, registration and so on.
The fifth part is the comparative study of the system of the selection and appointment of the judicial expert. This part mainly analyzes the system of the accreditation of the parties to the parties in the Anglo American legal system and the system of the authentication of the judicial officers in the countries of the continental law system, and in the light of our country's litigation system, it is proposed that the identification of the judicial organs should be established in our country and the parties' authorization to be identified as a supplementary system in our country. Degree.
The sixth part is the comparative study of the rights and obligations of the judicial authenticator. This part mainly introduces the rights and obligations of the appraisers in different countries of the civil law system, and analyses the needs of the appraisers in our country.
The right to the right tooth.
The seventh part is the comparison of legal liability of judicial appraisers.
The legal liability of the national appraiser is put forward, and the legal liability of the appraiser is put forward.
The principle of liability fixation and the type of legal liability for determining liability are discussed in detail.
The responsibility of a person is: the legal responsibility of deliberately making false identification conclusions; the law of deliberately overdue appraisal.
Responsibility, damage caused by intentional or gross negligence, replacement of appraisal materials, and legal liability for serious consequences.
Refusing to appear in court as a legal liability, etc., the appraiser subjectively must be intentionally or gross negligence to bear the responsibility.
Types are criminal liability, civil liability, administrative responsibility, etc.
The legislation of forensic expert system is more difficult.
At present, the legislative status of the appraiser is put forward in foreign countries.
The National People's Congress or the Standing Committee should formulate a unified judicial relief law to regulate the system of appraisers.
Degree.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西南政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2002
【分類號】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 達(dá)麗娜;我國司法鑒定人救助制度研究[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 藍(lán)曉蕾;刑事鑒定問題研究[D];青島大學(xué);2011年

3 張建華;司法鑒定人權(quán)責(zé)制度：梳理、評析與完善[D];中南大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2039766