本文選題：國(guó)企高管 + 職務(wù)犯罪��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2012年碩士論文

【摘要】：近年來(lái),一些國(guó)有企業(yè)腐敗案件和重大決策失誤案件頻頻發(fā)生,各大案件牽涉的人員之廣、金額之大、后果之嚴(yán)重已經(jīng)到了讓人瞠目結(jié)舌的地步,如云銅集團(tuán)腐敗案、古井集團(tuán)腐敗案、輕騎集團(tuán)腐敗案、同煤集團(tuán)經(jīng)理腐敗案等等,導(dǎo)致這些腐敗窩案發(fā)生的正是國(guó)有企業(yè)的高級(jí)管理人員(簡(jiǎn)稱國(guó)企高管)。同時(shí)我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界和司法實(shí)務(wù)界更多的是關(guān)注一般意義上的國(guó)家工作人員的職務(wù)犯罪,對(duì)國(guó)有企業(yè)高管職務(wù)犯罪缺乏專題研究,以致國(guó)有企業(yè)高管職務(wù)犯罪的一些基本問題都沒有與非國(guó)有企業(yè)的職務(wù)犯罪區(qū)別開來(lái),這對(duì)我國(guó)職務(wù)犯罪類型在預(yù)防和懲治方面造成了不利影響,以至成為薄弱環(huán)節(jié),使得國(guó)有企業(yè)成為國(guó)企高管職務(wù)犯罪的高發(fā)領(lǐng)域,從而對(duì)國(guó)企高管職務(wù)犯罪問題進(jìn)行研究成為一個(gè)富有理論性和實(shí)踐性的課題。 國(guó)企高管職務(wù)犯罪是指國(guó)有企業(yè)的高級(jí)管理人員在履行職責(zé)的過程中,利用職務(wù)上的便利條件,濫用和私用職權(quán)所實(shí)施的違背職責(zé)要求的嚴(yán)重危害社會(huì)的依照刑法規(guī)定應(yīng)受刑罰處罰的犯罪行為,具有貪利、瀆職、侵權(quán)的屬性,同時(shí)還具有主觀犯罪性質(zhì)嚴(yán)重,犯罪行為隱蔽、犯罪手段多樣等特征。國(guó)企高管職務(wù)犯罪產(chǎn)生的原因是復(fù)雜多樣的,主要有追求享樂與貪圖名利、盲目攀比與心理失衡、僥幸冒險(xiǎn)與膽大妄為、權(quán)力私用與權(quán)力補(bǔ)償?shù)茸陨碓?也有企業(yè)內(nèi)部思想政治教育工作薄弱、企業(yè)產(chǎn)權(quán)結(jié)構(gòu)單一與高管權(quán)力集中、企業(yè)體制落后與管理混亂、監(jiān)督乏力、懲治不嚴(yán)等外部原因。因此,預(yù)防國(guó)企高管職務(wù)犯罪,重在加強(qiáng)教育工作、培養(yǎng)廉潔意識(shí)、搞好制度建設(shè)、規(guī)范國(guó)企管理、健全監(jiān)督機(jī)制、形成防控體系、加大查辦力度、嚴(yán)厲懲罰職務(wù)犯罪等。
[Abstract]:In recent years, some cases of corruption in state-owned enterprises and cases of major decision-making mistakes have occurred frequently. The number of personnel involved in each major case is so large, the amount of money involved is so large that the consequences have become startling, such as the copper group corruption case. The corruption cases of Gujing Group, Qingqi Group and the managers of the same Coal Group have led to the occurrence of these corruption cases by the senior managers of state-owned enterprises. At the same time, the criminal law circle and judicial practice of our country pay more attention to the official crime of the state functionary in the general sense, and lack of special research on the official crime of the senior executives of the state-owned enterprises. As a result, some basic problems of senior executives' duty crimes in state-owned enterprises have not been distinguished from those of non-state-owned enterprises. This has adversely affected the types of duty crimes in our country in terms of prevention and punishment, and has even become a weak link. It makes the state-owned enterprises become the high incidence field of the state-owned enterprise executive duty crime, so it becomes a theoretical and practical topic to study the problem of the state-owned enterprise executive duty crime. In the process of performing their duties, the senior managers of state-owned enterprises take advantage of the convenient conditions of their positions. Criminal acts that violate the requirements of duties and are seriously harmful to society committed by abusing or using their powers privately have the attributes of corruption, dereliction of duty and infringement, and are of a serious subjective criminal nature, if they are punishable by punishment in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Law. The criminal behavior is concealed, the crime means various and so on. The reasons for the crimes committed by senior executives in state-owned enterprises are complex and varied. They mainly include pursuing pleasure and seeking fame and fortune, blindly comparing with each other and psychological imbalance, taking chances and taking bold actions, private use of power and power compensation, and so on. There are also external reasons such as weak internal ideological and political education, single structure of enterprise property rights and centralized power of executives, backward enterprise system and confused management, weak supervision, lax punishment and so on. Therefore, it is important to strengthen education, cultivate clean consciousness, do a good job of system construction, standardize management of state-owned enterprises, perfect supervision mechanism, form prevention and control system, intensify investigation and handling, and severely punish duty crimes and so on.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2012
【分類號(hào)】：D917

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 倪瑞蘭,劉曉明;論文化、教育、道德、法制與犯罪預(yù)防的關(guān)系[J];承德民族師專學(xué)報(bào);1999年03期

2 明平;;國(guó)有企業(yè)改制過程中職務(wù)犯罪透視及預(yù)防對(duì)策[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2008年10期

3 梁立思;田繼軍;;國(guó)有企業(yè)職務(wù)犯罪原因分析及預(yù)防對(duì)策[J];法制與經(jīng)濟(jì)(中旬刊);2010年12期

4 由龍濤;;論職務(wù)犯罪的概念[J];理論學(xué)刊;2010年12期

5 曾福珍;;對(duì)預(yù)防國(guó)有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人員貪利性職務(wù)犯罪的思考[J];安徽冶金科技職業(yè)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年04期

6 丁海林;王仲秋;;對(duì)當(dāng)前國(guó)企職務(wù)犯罪原因與預(yù)防對(duì)策的調(diào)查分析[J];中國(guó)檢察官;2010年05期

7 荊學(xué)輝,宋華鋒;國(guó)有企業(yè)領(lǐng)導(dǎo)干部職務(wù)犯罪及對(duì)策淺析[J];前沿;2004年10期

8 徐偉;當(dāng)前國(guó)有企業(yè)預(yù)防職務(wù)犯罪的對(duì)策分析[J];商場(chǎng)現(xiàn)代化;2005年24期

9 方明;;職務(wù)犯罪原因論及其啟示[J];西南政法大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2007年04期

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前3條

1 本報(bào)記者 李英華　通訊員 齊紅;[N];檢察日?qǐng)?bào);2009年

2 鄧欣　振濤 志靈;[N];新鄉(xiāng)日?qǐng)?bào);2008年

3 徐叔衡;[N];證券時(shí)報(bào);2009年

，

本文編號(hào)：1957850