本文選題：科學(xué)不端行為 + 犯罪化��； 參考：《湖南師范大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：科學(xué)不端行為的存在方式在空間上具有廣泛性,在時間上具有恒常性。現(xiàn)代社會里,隨著科技競爭的越發(fā)激烈,科學(xué)不端行為更是頻繁發(fā)生,而科技進(jìn)步對社會發(fā)展正日益發(fā)揮著決定性作用,這使得科學(xué)不端行為給社會造成的危害比以往任何時代都大。目前,我國對科學(xué)不端行為的調(diào)控主要依靠道德、民事和行政手段進(jìn)行,然而調(diào)控的結(jié)果不盡人意,科學(xué)不端行為增多的趨勢并未得到抑制。在這一形勢下,將一部分具有嚴(yán)重社會危害性的科學(xué)不端行為做犯罪化處理,用公權(quán)力來保障科研活動的健康開展是一種有意義、有價值的制度嘗試。本文從犯罪學(xué)的角度,借助刑法科學(xué)理論,通過審視科學(xué)史上的一些實例,從理論上論證了科學(xué)不端行為犯罪化的必要性和可行性。 論文首先從語義分析出發(fā),以“科學(xué)研究活動——科學(xué)越軌行為——科學(xué)不端行為”為邏輯脈絡(luò),層層遞進(jìn)地分析了一些相關(guān)概念的內(nèi)涵與外延及它們之間的關(guān)系,從而最終明確現(xiàn)階段可以成為刑事治理對象的科研行為的行為界域——篡改、偽造和剽竊。 隨后,論文從理論及現(xiàn)實兩個層面尋找科學(xué)不端行為犯罪化的依據(jù)。從刑法理論的角度來看,科學(xué)不端行為具備嚴(yán)重的社會危害性和應(yīng)受懲罰性;從實踐的角度來看,科學(xué)不端行為對科學(xué)研究活動的開展具有誤導(dǎo)和干擾作用,使科研的失敗風(fēng)險加大,容易導(dǎo)致科研結(jié)果的無效或低效,極大地阻礙了科學(xué)進(jìn)步,甚至嚴(yán)重?fù)p害國家榮譽。因此,我國應(yīng)借鑒國外立法和司法實踐,嘗試對科學(xué)不端行為犯罪化。 最后,論文在前文理論探討的基礎(chǔ)上,以刑法謙抑性為原則,遵循我國刑法典,結(jié)合我國科研體制的特點,針對“創(chuàng)設(shè)罪名”與“配置適于科學(xué)不端行為刑事治理的刑罰”這兩條途徑,以創(chuàng)設(shè)偽造數(shù)據(jù)罪,配置資格刑為例,對建立科學(xué)不端行為刑事治理制度提出了立法建議,期望對科學(xué)不端行為的有效治理能有所幫助。
[Abstract]:The existence of scientific misconduct has the universality in space and constant in time. In modern society, with the increasingly fierce competition in science and technology, scientific misconduct is more frequent, and the progress of science and technology is playing an increasingly decisive role in social development, which makes the harm to society caused by the misconduct of Science. At present, the regulation of scientific misconduct in our country mainly depends on moral, civil and administrative means. However, the result of the regulation is not satisfactory. The trend of the increase of scientific misconduct has not been suppressed. In this situation, a part of the scientific misconduct with serious social harmfulness is criminally treated and used in this situation. Public power to ensure the healthy development of scientific research activities is a meaningful and valuable system attempt. From the perspective of criminology, with the help of the scientific theory of criminal law, the necessity and feasibility of the criminalization of scientific misconduct is theoretically demonstrated by examining some examples in the history of science.
Starting from the semantic analysis, the thesis begins with the logical context of "scientific research activity - scientific deviant behavior - scientific misconduct". It analyzes the connotation and extension of some related concepts and the relationship between them layer by step, so as to make it clear that the present stage can become the behavioral domain of the research behavior of the object of criminal governance. Tampering, forgery and plagiarism.
Then, from two aspects of theory and reality, the paper tries to find the basis for the criminalization of scientific misconduct. From the perspective of criminal law theory, the scientific misconduct has serious social harmfulness and punitive punishment. From the practical point of view, scientific misconduct has misleading and interfering effects on the development of scientific research. The increase of failure risk leads to the invalidity or inefficiency of scientific research results, which greatly hinders scientific progress and even seriously damages national honor. Therefore, our country should learn from foreign legislation and judicial practice to try to criminalization of scientific misconduct.
Finally, on the basis of the theoretical discussion of the previous article, the thesis, based on the principle of the modesty of criminal law, followed the characteristics of our country's criminal law, combined with the characteristics of our country's scientific research system, aimed at the two ways of "creating a crime" and "configuring criminal punishment for the misconduct of scientific misconduct", in order to create a false data crime and configure the qualification penalty as an example, and to establish a scientific misconduct. The behavior criminal governance system puts forward legislative proposals, hoping to help the effective management of scientific misconduct.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：湖南師范大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：D917;D914

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前1條

1 閆金定;;我國科技信用體系建設(shè)現(xiàn)狀及思考[J];中國基礎(chǔ)科學(xué);2007年03期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 雷搏;論科學(xué)不端現(xiàn)象及其法律應(yīng)對[D];太原科技大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號：1947470