本文選題：鑒定結(jié)論 + 司法鑒定��； 參考：《上海交通大學》2008年碩士論文

【摘要】： 鑒定結(jié)論在案件處理過程中越來越顯得重要,本文作者從司法鑒定啟動權(quán)入手闡述司法鑒定啟動權(quán)由司法機關(guān)啟動和當事人消極啟動兩種啟動模式,分析這兩種模式的利弊,看到我國司法鑒定體制的弊端,看到由于司法鑒定機構(gòu)缺乏應有的獨立性,檢察機關(guān)缺乏監(jiān)督以及腐敗現(xiàn)象的存在等導致司法鑒定啟動存在這么多弊端。 通過對英美法系在當事人主義訴訟制度下的司法鑒定啟動和大陸法系的職權(quán)主義訴訟制度的司法鑒定啟動制度進行比較,認識到英美法系與大陸法系的鑒定制度的互補傾向是非常明顯的,英美法系的鑒定制度中的客觀中立無疑是避免專家證人對委托方的傾向性,大陸法系的法官職權(quán)性質(zhì)也是改善訴訟低效率的良方,從而認識到司法鑒定的啟動應該由當事人和法院互動并相互監(jiān)督和制約,對司法鑒定的啟動權(quán)進行重新分配,由當事人申請啟動鑒定,法院決定啟動鑒定,引入專家證人制度來制約法院的決定權(quán),通過這樣的模式來真正實現(xiàn)公平正義。
[Abstract]:The conclusion of appraisal is more and more important in the process of handling cases. The author starts with the right of initiation of judicial identification and expounds the two modes of starting the right of initiation of judicial identification by judicial organs and the parties passively, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of these two modes. We can see the malpractice of the judicial expertise system in our country, the lack of the independence of the judicial appraisal institution, the lack of supervision of the procuratorial organ and the existence of the phenomenon of corruption, etc., which lead to so many malpractices in the initiation of the judicial expertise. By comparing the initiation of judicial identification between the common law system under the litigant litigation system and that of the civil law system of the authority doctrine litigation system, the paper compares the system of judicial identification of the common law system with that of the civil law system. Recognizing that the complementary tendency of the identification systems of common law and civil law systems is very clear and that the objective neutrality of the identification systems of common law systems is undoubtedly to avoid the bias of expert witnesses towards the client, The nature of judges' functions and powers in the civil law system is also a good way to improve the low efficiency of litigation, so as to realize that the initiation of judicial expertise should be redistributed by the parties and the courts, which should interact with each other and supervise and restrict each other. The parties apply for the initiation of identification, the court decides to initiate the appraisal, and the expert witness system is introduced to restrict the decision of the court.
【學位授予單位】：上海交通大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2008
【分類號】：D918.9

【引證文獻】

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前3條

1 李春明;司法鑒定啟動程序研究[D];河南大學;2011年

2 楊艷;淺析司法鑒定啟動權(quán)[D];中國政法大學;2011年

3 沈文征;論我國司法鑒定啟動程序的適用與完善[D];蘇州大學;2011年

，

本文編號：1815280