本文選題：司法鑒定 + 制度　； 參考：《鄭州大學(xué)》2005年碩士論文

【摘要】：司法鑒定是指在訴訟活動中鑒定人運(yùn)用科學(xué)技術(shù)或者專門知識對訴訟涉及的專門性問題進(jìn)行鑒別和判斷并提供鑒定意見的活動。本文結(jié)合我國現(xiàn)行法律制度,聯(lián)系英美法系國家和大陸法系國家的司法鑒定制度,運(yùn)用比較的方法,剖析了我國現(xiàn)行司法鑒定制度之不足,提出了改革完善的措施。 本文除引言外,共分六個(gè)部分。引言部分介紹了司法鑒定的歷史沿革,以及司法鑒定制度改革的醞釀、發(fā)展與成就。第一部分是司法鑒定制度改革的必要性。長期以來,我國司法鑒定活動的混亂在一定程度上影響了司法機(jī)關(guān)的公信力,從社會發(fā)展、法治建設(shè)、經(jīng)濟(jì)運(yùn)行、科技進(jìn)步的角度來看,司法鑒定制度改革是時(shí)代的呼喚。第二部分是司法鑒定制度改革的思路。首先要正確界定司法鑒定的內(nèi)涵和外延。要認(rèn)真把握司法鑒定的基本性質(zhì)。要充分認(rèn)識司法鑒定的本質(zhì)特征。要遵循司法改革的基本目標(biāo)和總體要求。要積極借鑒世界各國的有益經(jīng)驗(yàn)。第三部分是司法鑒定管理制度改革。長期以來,我國司法鑒定立法嚴(yán)重滯后,必須加以改革完善。要建立統(tǒng)一的司法鑒定管理體制,科學(xué)地設(shè)置司法鑒定機(jī)構(gòu)。第四部分是司法鑒定人制度改革。在英美法系國家,司法鑒定人被稱為“專家證人”,在大陸法系國家,司法鑒定人被稱為“法官的科學(xué)輔助人”。我國司法鑒定人的法律地位是“訴訟參與人”。要明確我國司法鑒定人的權(quán)利、義務(wù)和法律責(zé)任。第五部分是司法鑒定啟動制度改革。英美法系國家實(shí)行的是當(dāng)事人啟動制,大陸法系國家實(shí)行的是司法官啟動制。我國司法鑒定啟動制度的主要弊端是偵控機(jī)關(guān)權(quán)利過大,抗辯力量明顯失衡。未來我國司法鑒定啟動模式應(yīng)采取司法官啟動制為主,
[Abstract]:Forensic expertise refers to the activities in which experts use science and technology or expertise to identify and judge the specialized issues involved in litigation and to provide expert opinions.Combined with the current legal system of our country and the judicial identification system of the countries of common law system and civil law system, this paper analyzes the deficiency of the current judicial identification system of our country by means of comparative method, and puts forward some measures to reform and perfect it.In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into six parts.The introduction introduces the history of judicial expertise, as well as the brewing, development and achievements of the reform of judicial expertise system.The first part is the necessity of the reform of judicial expertise system.For a long time, the confusion of judicial expertise activities in China has affected the credibility of judicial organs to a certain extent. From the point of view of social development, the construction of rule of law, the economic operation and the progress of science and technology, the reform of judicial expertise system is the call of the times.The second part is the train of thought of the reform of judicial expertise system.First of all, the connotation and extension of judicial expertise should be defined correctly.We must seriously grasp the basic nature of judicial expertise.We should fully understand the essential characteristics of judicial expertise.We should follow the basic objectives and overall requirements of judicial reform.We should actively learn from the beneficial experience of various countries in the world.The third part is the reform of judicial expertise management system.For a long time, the legislation of judicial expertise in our country has lagged behind seriously and must be reformed and perfected.It is necessary to establish a unified administrative system of judicial expertise and scientifically set up judicial expertise institutions.The fourth part is the reform of judicial expert system.In common law countries, judicial appraisers are called "expert witnesses", while in civil law countries they are called "scientific auxiliaries of judges".The legal status of judicial connoisseur in our country is "litigant participant".It is necessary to clarify the rights, obligations and legal responsibilities of judicial connoisseurs in China.The fifth part is the reform of the initiation system of forensic expertise.Anglo-American law countries implement the system of litigant priming and civil law countries implement the system of law enforcement.The main malpractice of our country's judicial appraisal system is that the power of investigation and control organs is too large and the defense power is obviously out of balance.In the future, the starting mode of judicial expertise in China should be based on the priming system of magistrates.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：鄭州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2005
【分類號】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 藍(lán)曉蕾;刑事鑒定問題研究[D];青島大學(xué);2011年

，

本文編號：1754957