本文選題：特殊偵查 + 法律規(guī)制　； 參考：《山東大學(xué)》2007年碩士論文

【摘要】： 隨著犯罪的智能化、組織化、隱蔽化程度的提高，傳統(tǒng)的偵查模式遇到了前所未有的挑戰(zhàn)。作為應(yīng)對(duì)新形勢(shì)犯罪的特殊偵查手段已經(jīng)在世界范圍內(nèi)廣泛使用，在打擊與懲治犯罪中發(fā)揮了常規(guī)偵查手段所不可替代的作用。但是，如果特殊偵查手段使用不當(dāng)，極易侵犯公民的合法權(quán)益。因此如何立法規(guī)制特殊偵查手段，平衡特殊偵查手段在打擊犯罪與保障人權(quán)價(jià)值上的沖突，成為當(dāng)前立法和司法實(shí)踐的重要課題。本文從特殊偵查手段的概念入手，分析了特殊偵查的功能與價(jià)值，通過對(duì)國(guó)外特殊偵查手段立法、司法實(shí)踐的考察，對(duì)我國(guó)特殊偵查手段的法制化建設(shè)提出了具體建議。本文共分五章。 第一章特殊偵查手段的理論界定。本章共分三個(gè)部分，第一部分列舉了國(guó)際法上關(guān)于特殊偵查手段的規(guī)定，第二部分通過與秘密偵查、技術(shù)偵察、技術(shù)偵查等概念的比較，提出了作者對(duì)特殊偵查手段概念的個(gè)人見解，第三部分重點(diǎn)分析了特殊偵查手段所具備的秘密性、技術(shù)性、主動(dòng)性、強(qiáng)制性的法律特征。 第二章特殊偵查手段的法律功能與價(jià)值分析是當(dāng)前法律界比較關(guān)注的問題。本章主要從三個(gè)方面進(jìn)行論述。一是指出了特殊偵查手段在打擊和懲治犯罪中區(qū)別于常規(guī)偵查措施的法律功能，主要表現(xiàn)為及時(shí)、準(zhǔn)確發(fā)現(xiàn)犯罪嫌疑人、更有利于收集和固定證據(jù)和延伸偵查思維。二是論述了特殊偵查手段的價(jià)值體現(xiàn)。主要體現(xiàn)為實(shí)體正義價(jià)值、程序公正價(jià)值、偵查效益價(jià)值、人權(quán)保障價(jià)值。三是從秘密偵查與隱私權(quán)保護(hù)、偵查效益與人權(quán)保護(hù)兩個(gè)角度具體闡述了特殊偵查手段的價(jià)值沖突與平衡。 第三章域外特殊偵查手段法律現(xiàn)狀比較研究。首先對(duì)域外特殊偵查手段立法模式進(jìn)行了探討，然后重點(diǎn)考察了美國(guó)、德國(guó)、日本、英國(guó)以及其他國(guó)家和地區(qū)的立法和司法實(shí)踐，最后總結(jié)出國(guó)外在特殊偵查手段立法中所遵循的基本原則。 第四章主要分析了我國(guó)特殊偵查手段的立法和司法現(xiàn)狀。首先作者闡明了特殊偵查手段法制化在我國(guó)具有重大的現(xiàn)實(shí)意義。然后通過介紹我國(guó)關(guān)于特殊偵查手段的法律規(guī)定，指出了我國(guó)司法實(shí)踐中特殊偵查手段在案件適用范圍、審批權(quán)限、證據(jù)采納及司法救濟(jì)等方面存在的缺陷。 第五章是對(duì)完善我國(guó)特殊偵查手段法治化的具體構(gòu)想。主要包括三個(gè)方面：一是從立法原則上，應(yīng)當(dāng)合理地借鑒和移植國(guó)外基本立法原則，但更要適合我國(guó)國(guó)情。二是在立法模式認(rèn)為根據(jù)目前我國(guó)的立法司法現(xiàn)狀應(yīng)當(dāng)在刑訴法中對(duì)特殊偵查手段以具體規(guī)定，，三是從特殊偵查手段的司法實(shí)踐中對(duì)實(shí)施主體、適用案件范圍、適用對(duì)象和使用程序上提出了具體建議。
[Abstract]:With the improvement of intelligence, organization and concealment of crime, the traditional investigation mode is confronted with unprecedented challenges.As a special investigative means to deal with crimes in the new situation, it has been widely used in the world, and has played an irreplaceable role in the fight against and punishment of crimes.However, if the special investigative techniques are used improperly, it is easy to violate the legal rights and interests of citizens.Therefore, how to legislate to regulate the special investigative techniques and balance the conflict of the special investigative techniques in the fight against crime and the protection of human rights has become an important subject in the current legislation and judicial practice.Starting with the concept of special investigative techniques, this paper analyzes the function and value of special investigative techniques, and puts forward some concrete suggestions on the legalization construction of special investigative techniques in our country through the investigation of the legislation and judicial practice of foreign special investigative techniques.This paper is divided into five chapters.The first chapter is the theoretical definition of special investigative techniques.This chapter is divided into three parts. The first part lists the provisions on special investigative techniques in international law. The second part compares with the concepts of secret investigation, technical reconnaissance, technical investigation, etc.This paper puts forward the author's personal opinion on the concept of special investigative techniques. The third part focuses on the analysis of the legal characteristics of the special investigative techniques such as secrecy, technology, initiative and compulsion.The second chapter is the legal function and value analysis of special investigative techniques.This chapter mainly discusses from three aspects.First, it points out the legal function of the special investigative techniques in striking and punishing crimes, which is different from the conventional investigative measures, which is mainly manifested in the prompt and accurate discovery of criminal suspects, which is more conducive to collecting and fixing evidence and extending the investigative thinking.Second, it discusses the value of special investigative techniques.It mainly embodies the value of substantive justice, procedural justice, investigation benefit and human rights protection.Thirdly, from the aspects of secret investigation and privacy protection, investigation benefit and human rights protection, the value conflict and balance of special investigative techniques are expounded in detail.The third chapter is a comparative study on the present situation of foreign special investigative techniques.First of all, it discusses the legislative model of extraterritorial special investigative techniques, and then focuses on the legislative and judicial practice of the United States, Germany, Japan, Britain and other countries and regions.Finally, it summarizes the basic principles followed in the legislation of special investigative techniques abroad.The fourth chapter mainly analyzes the legislative and judicial status of special investigative techniques in China.First of all, the author clarifies that the legalization of special investigative means has great practical significance in our country.Then by introducing the legal provisions on special investigative techniques in our country, this paper points out the defects of special investigative techniques in the application scope of cases, the jurisdiction of examination and approval, the acceptance of evidence and the judicial relief in our judicial practice.The fifth chapter is to perfect our country special investigation technique rule of law concrete idea.It mainly includes three aspects: first, from the legislative principle, we should use for reference and transplant foreign basic legislative principles reasonably, but should be more suitable for our national conditions.The second is that according to the current situation of legislation and judicature in our country, the special investigative techniques should be specified in the Criminal procedure Law, the third is to apply the scope of cases to the subject in the judicial practice of the special investigative techniques.Specific suggestions are made on the applicable object and procedure.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：山東大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2007
【分類號(hào)】：D918.2

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 廖覓;我國(guó)特殊偵查措施的規(guī)制與完善思考[D];華東政法大學(xué);2011年

2 胡遠(yuǎn)陵;職務(wù)犯罪特殊偵查措施初探[D];湘潭大學(xué);2010年

3 李芹芹;技術(shù)偵查措施中的人權(quán)保護(hù)問題研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2012年

本文編號(hào)：1743813