網絡誹謗的犯罪預防與司法處置
發(fā)布時間:2018-03-26 20:04
本文選題:誹謗罪 切入點:網絡 出處:《煙臺大學》2011年碩士論文
【摘要】:網絡誹謗作為當今社會一種較為典型的網絡侵權方式,具有手段多樣、隱匿性強、傳播快、危害后果難以消除等特點。由于網絡誹謗是新興事物,而我國現行法律及司法解釋對其規(guī)定的不健全,致使在司法處置中存在網絡犯罪的認定標準不一、訴訟主體確定不準、管轄權爭議多現、證據收集困難、案件性質不確定等問題。 本文從訴訟程序角度分析了網絡誹謗的司法處置問題,總結了網絡誹謗的現狀及存在的問題,在此基礎上提出了網絡誹謗司法處置程序的完善建議。筆者認為,網絡誹謗危害后果難以消除的特點決定著司法處置并不是解決網絡誹謗的最佳途徑,還應從建立完善網絡傳播內容的檢測監(jiān)督機制、網上舉報機制、對網絡服務商的約束機制等方面對網絡誹謗犯罪加以預防,從最初環(huán)節(jié)開始對網絡誹謗進行預防,使事前的監(jiān)督預防與事后的訴訟追責相結合,從而能更好地解決網絡誹謗犯罪的遏制問題。
[Abstract]:As the social network libel a typical network infringement mode, with a variety of means, occult, fast spread, characteristics of harmful consequences. It is difficult to eliminate because of Internet defamation is a new thing, and Chinese law and judicial interpretation of the provisions is not perfect, resulting in the identification standard of network crime in judicial disposal to be a subject of litigation jurisdiction dispute inaccurate, is more difficult to collect evidence, the nature of the case problem is not sure.
This paper analyzes the judicial disposal problem of Internet defamation from the perspective of legal proceedings, summarizes the current situation of Internet defamation and the existing problems, put forward on the basis of network defamation judicial disposal program suggestions. The author believes that the characteristics of the network is difficult to eliminate the consequences of libel determines the judicial disposal is not the best way to solve the network defamation, also establish and improve the network dissemination of the contents of the inspection and supervision mechanism should, online reporting mechanism for network service providers and restraint mechanisms to prevent crime of defamation on the network, from the initial link network began to slander the prevention, supervision and prevention of pre and post procedure accountable combining to better solve the problem of network control the crime of defamation.
【學位授予單位】:煙臺大學
【學位級別】:碩士
【學位授予年份】:2011
【分類號】:D917;D925
【參考文獻】
相關期刊論文 前3條
1 肖永平,徐鵬;網絡誹謗國際管轄權問題初探[J];法商研究;2003年03期
2 唐煜楓;;論誹謗罪成立之憲法限制[J];甘肅政法學院學報;2006年02期
3 董玉庭;主觀超過因素新論[J];法學研究;2005年03期
,本文編號:1669369
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/shekelunwen/gongan/1669369.html