本文關(guān)鍵詞： 司法鑒定 鑒定人 鑒定結(jié)論 司法鑒定程序　出處：《中國(guó)政法大學(xué)》2008年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】： 司法鑒定制度是當(dāng)代各國(guó)司法制度的重要組成部分,在一定程度上反映著一國(guó)法律制度、司法制度、訴訟制度、證據(jù)制度的靈魂與精髓。因此,分析和探討一國(guó)的司法鑒定制度,就可以在一定程度上把握該國(guó)訴訟制度乃至司法制度的全局和品格�；诖�,筆者對(duì)我國(guó)民事司法鑒定中的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行了初步的探討。 筆者從四個(gè)方面對(duì)我國(guó)民事司法鑒定中的相關(guān)問題進(jìn)行了探討: 第一章為概述。該章對(duì)鑒定以及相關(guān)概念進(jìn)行了界定,對(duì)鑒定的種類進(jìn)行了劃分,重申了司法鑒定應(yīng)當(dāng)遵循的原則,可以說,該章為下文的論述作了必要的準(zhǔn)備,以避免因概念的混亂給相關(guān)問題的探討帶了困惑和麻煩。 第二章為鑒定的主體。鑒定人是鑒定結(jié)論賴以生成的源泉,鑒定人性質(zhì)的界定、角色的定位、地位的確認(rèn)以及權(quán)利、義務(wù)及責(zé)任的明晰,對(duì)于判斷鑒定制度是否合理以及生成的鑒定結(jié)論是否客觀具有重要的意義,是鑒定體系中不可缺少的重要環(huán)節(jié)。因而本章對(duì)這些問題進(jìn)行了梳理,并建議引入“專家輔助人”制度,明確司法實(shí)踐中鑒定人無故不出庭接受詢問的法律責(zé)任。 第三章為鑒定結(jié)論。鑒定結(jié)論是可以說是整個(gè)司法鑒定程序圍繞的中心,所有的程序設(shè)計(jì)都是為了得到一份可靠、有效的鑒定結(jié)論,同時(shí)鑒定結(jié)論作為法定的證據(jù)種類,有著其自身特有的證據(jù)屬性和價(jià)值,也正是因?yàn)槿绱?在整個(gè)證據(jù)體系中,也只有司法鑒定才具有制度建設(shè)的意義。因此,筆者對(duì)鑒定結(jié)論進(jìn)行了界定、對(duì)鑒定結(jié)論的特性、價(jià)值以及在沖突鑒定結(jié)論的選擇適用問題上進(jìn)行了分析和探討。 第四章為司法鑒定程序論。本章包括了司法鑒定程序的啟動(dòng)、實(shí)施、質(zhì)證以及認(rèn)證四部分,在論述中采用了比較分析的方法,著重論述了民事司法領(lǐng)域中兩大法系國(guó)家司法鑒定程序的不同,最終為我國(guó)司法鑒定程序的完善提供借鑒。 筆者試圖通過本文的探討,在民事司法鑒定制度中實(shí)現(xiàn)權(quán)利與權(quán)力的合理配置,糾正在實(shí)踐工作中錯(cuò)誤現(xiàn)象,為我國(guó)民事司法鑒定營(yíng)造一個(gè)良好的“司法空間”。但由于筆者理論功底有限,缺少對(duì)鑒定工作的實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn),對(duì)許多問題的探討都只是淺嘗則止,其中的疏漏錯(cuò)誤請(qǐng)各位老師指正。
[Abstract]:Judicial identification system is an important part of the judicial system of contemporary countries, to a certain extent, it reflects the soul and essence of a country's legal system, judicial system, litigation system, and evidence system. By analyzing and discussing the judicial identification system of a country, we can grasp the overall situation and character of the litigation system and even the judicial system to a certain extent. Based on this, the author makes a preliminary discussion on the related problems in the civil judicial expertise of our country. The author probes into the relevant problems in the civil judicial expertise in China from four aspects:. The first chapter is an overview. This chapter defines the identification and related concepts, classifies the types of identification, reaffirms the principles that should be followed in judicial identification, and it can be said that this chapter makes the necessary preparations for the discussion below. In order to avoid the confusion of concepts to the discussion of related problems with confusion and trouble. The second chapter is the subject of the appraisal. The expert is the source of the conclusion, the definition of the nature of the expert, the location of the role, the confirmation of the status, and the clarity of the rights, obligations and responsibilities. It is of great significance to judge whether the appraisal system is reasonable or not and whether the conclusions are objective or not, which is an indispensable and important link in the appraisal system. It is suggested that the system of "expert assistant" should be introduced to clarify the legal liability of experts not appearing for questioning in judicial practice. The third chapter is the conclusion of identification. The conclusion of identification is the center of the whole judicial identification procedure. All the procedures are designed to obtain a reliable and effective conclusion. At the same time, the conclusion of identification is regarded as the legal type of evidence. Has its own unique evidence attribute and the value, also is because of this, in the entire evidence system, only the judicial appraisal also has the system construction significance. Therefore, the author has carried on the definition to the appraisal conclusion, to the appraisal conclusion characteristic, The value and the selection and application of the conclusion of conflict identification are analyzed and discussed. Chapter 4th is the theory of judicial identification procedure. This chapter includes four parts: initiation, implementation, cross-examination and authentication. This paper mainly discusses the differences of the judicial identification procedures between the two legal systems in the field of civil justice, and finally provides reference for the perfection of the judicial identification procedures in our country. The author tries to realize the rational allocation of rights and powers in the civil judicial appraisal system through the discussion of this article, and correct the wrong phenomenon in practice. To create a good "judicial space" for civil judicial expertise in our country. However, due to the author's limited theoretical background and lack of practical experience in the appraisal work, the discussion of many problems is only a simple taste. One of the omissions and errors please ask the teachers to correct.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)政法大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2008
【分類號(hào)】：D918.9

【引證文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 農(nóng)茈淳;試論民事訴訟中司法鑒定程序的啟動(dòng)權(quán)之完善[D];廣西大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1548986