本文關鍵詞： 勞動教養(yǎng) 改革 立法完善　出處：《廈門大學》2001年碩士論文　論文類型：學位論文

【摘要】： 勞動教養(yǎng)制度是我國一項重要的法律制度，但在推進依法治國的進程中，，其缺陷日益凸現(xiàn)出來，特別是在我國新《刑法》、《刑事訴訟法》及《行政處罰法》、《立法法》相繼頒布實施后，勞動教養(yǎng)制度的合理性、合法性受到質疑，其存廢問題也引起了熱烈討論。本文試圖對勞動教養(yǎng)的性質及適用條件等重大問題進行研究探討，在此基礎上對勞動教養(yǎng)的改革與完善問題提出立法構想。 本文除引言和結語外，共分六章： 第一章勞動教養(yǎng)制度概述。主要考證了勞動教養(yǎng)的產(chǎn)生、形成及發(fā)展的歷史，考察了前蘇聯(lián)和美國的勞動教養(yǎng)制度，介紹了我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的基本情況，并對中外勞動教養(yǎng)制度進行比較分析。 第二章我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度的缺陷與發(fā)展走向。主要分析了我國現(xiàn)行勞動教養(yǎng)制度存在的問題、勞動教養(yǎng)制度存在的原因，認為勞動教養(yǎng)制度改革的方向是改變其性質，將其刑事立法化、司法化，使之成為刑法上保安處分的種類，并進一步論述了勞動教養(yǎng)制度改革的必要性。 第三章勞動教養(yǎng)的定性定位問題。主要對勞動教養(yǎng)的性質及理論界的爭論進行評析，把我國勞動教養(yǎng)制度與國外保安處分進行分析對比，對勞動教養(yǎng)性質及價值取向進行界定，認為勞動教養(yǎng)是—種保安性措施，其功能定位在保護社會、防止犯罪危險性，是刑法的補充。 第四章勞動教養(yǎng)適用條件。主要對勞動教養(yǎng)的適用對象、適用范圍和責任條件進行考察和評析，在立法上如何完善問題提出建議。 第五章勞動教養(yǎng)審批決定權行使與制約。主要分析了勞動教養(yǎng)審批程序上之不足，對有關專家學者提出的審批決定權的分配方案進行評析，確定立法上可行性的選擇。 第六章勞動教養(yǎng)立法的構建思路。在對勞動教養(yǎng)的定性定位的基礎上，論述了勞動教養(yǎng)立法的憲法依據(jù)，立法模式的選擇，法律名稱的確定，及立法中必須重點解決的問題。
[Abstract]:The system of re-education through labor is an important legal system in our country, but in the process of promoting the rule of law, its defects are increasingly obvious, especially in the new Criminal Law, the Criminal procedure Law and the Administrative punishment Law. After the enactment and implementation of the "Legislative Law" one after another, the rationality and legality of the system of re-education through labour has been questioned. This paper attempts to study the nature and applicable conditions of reeducation through labor and puts forward a legislative conception on the reform and perfection of reeducation through labor. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, this article is divided into six chapters: The first chapter is an overview of the system of re-education through labor. It mainly examines the history of the emergence, formation and development of reeducation through labour, and examines the former Soviet Union and the United States of America's system of re-education through labour. This paper introduces the basic situation of the system of reeducation through labor in China and makes a comparative analysis of the system of reeducation through labor at home and abroad. The second chapter is the defect and development trend of our country's re-education through labor system. It mainly analyzes the existing problems of our country's current system of re-education through labor and the reasons for the existence of the system of re-education through labor. The author thinks that the direction of reform of reeducation through labor system is to change its nature, to legislate its criminal law and to make it a kind of security measure in criminal law, and further discusses the necessity of reforming the system of reeducation through labor. The third chapter is the qualitative orientation of reeducation through labor. It mainly analyzes the nature of reeducation through labor and the controversy in the theoretical circle, and analyzes and compares the system of reeducation through labor in our country with foreign security measures. This paper defines the nature and value orientation of reeducation through labor and holds that reeducation through labor is a kind of security measure whose function is to protect society and prevent the danger of crime and is a supplement to the criminal law. Chapter 4th is about the applicable conditions of reeducation through labor. It mainly investigates and evaluates the applicable object, applicable scope and responsibility conditions of reeducation through labor, and puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the legislation. Chapter 5th: exercise and restriction of the decision on the examination and approval of re-education through labor. This paper mainly analyzes the shortcomings of the approval procedure of re-education through labour, and evaluates the distribution scheme of the decision of approval proposed by the experts and scholars concerned. To determine the legislative feasibility of the choice. On the basis of the qualitative orientation of reeducation through labor, this paper discusses the constitutional basis, the choice of legislative model and the determination of legal name of the legislation of re-education through labor. And the problems that must be solved in legislation.
【學位授予單位】：廈門大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2001
【分類號】：D926.8

【引證文獻】

相關博士學位論文 前1條

1 于鵬飛;認識與反思：近三十年勞動教養(yǎng)制度研究史[D];華東政法大學;2012年

本文編號：1473859