本文選題：國(guó)家電網(wǎng) + 主輔分離��； 參考：《首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：自國(guó)務(wù)院提出了電力體制改革四大使命以來(lái),我國(guó)電力體制改革正在逐年穩(wěn)步推進(jìn)。13年來(lái)取得了很多可喜的成果,同時(shí)也暴露出諸多問(wèn)題,例如主輔分離不徹底,輸配沒有分開,電價(jià)機(jī)制不完善等,其中制約改革繼續(xù)的一個(gè)重要因素就是電網(wǎng)的主輔分離沒有得到徹底解決。主輔分離是輸配分開的前提,輸配分開是合理電價(jià)機(jī)制形成的保障。雖然國(guó)家電網(wǎng)已將火、水電施工,電力勘探設(shè)計(jì)和電力修造企業(yè)從主業(yè)中剝離,但剝離的基本是一些經(jīng)濟(jì)效益不高,行業(yè)集中度較低,而且大多是與主業(yè)聯(lián)系不緊密的輔業(yè)資產(chǎn)。對(duì)于與電網(wǎng)公司聯(lián)系緊密的輔業(yè)以及各種三產(chǎn),國(guó)家電網(wǎng)目前并沒有剝離計(jì)劃。而且國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司收購(gòu)平高、許繼兩大電氣設(shè)備制造的龍頭企業(yè),是主輔分離改革的逆行之舉。所以繼續(xù)推行國(guó)家電網(wǎng)主輔分離改革是目前電力改革的重中之重,不容小視。本論文通過(guò)對(duì)現(xiàn)實(shí)問(wèn)題的剖析,從改革過(guò)程、取得的成果和存在的問(wèn)題三個(gè)方面對(duì)我國(guó)電力體制改革的進(jìn)程進(jìn)行回顧,認(rèn)為目前我國(guó)電改存在主輔分離不徹底、輸配未分開,電網(wǎng)掌握電的獨(dú)家買賣權(quán),電價(jià)無(wú)法反應(yīng)供求等問(wèn)題,并結(jié)合國(guó)外的電力體制改革進(jìn)行對(duì)比分析。論文中對(duì)國(guó)家電網(wǎng)的主業(yè)和輔業(yè)進(jìn)行了詳細(xì)的劃分,將輔業(yè)劃分為三類,包括非商業(yè)化資產(chǎn)、電力輔助性企業(yè)和多種經(jīng)營(yíng)企業(yè)�？偨Y(jié)了目前國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司主輔分離的成果,認(rèn)為還存在主輔分離改革不徹底、重組集團(tuán)會(huì)帶來(lái)新壟斷、缺乏監(jiān)管機(jī)制等遺留問(wèn)題。本文的創(chuàng)新之處是在國(guó)家電網(wǎng)處置被剝離輔業(yè)資產(chǎn)的過(guò)程中引入競(jìng)拍機(jī)制,采用理論聯(lián)系實(shí)際的研究方法,建立博弈模型,結(jié)合成本、利潤(rùn)函數(shù)進(jìn)行定性和定量相結(jié)合的研究。詳細(xì)模擬了國(guó)內(nèi)企業(yè)參與競(jìng)拍被剝離輔業(yè)資產(chǎn)的過(guò)程,認(rèn)為競(jìng)拍結(jié)果的不同取決于市場(chǎng)規(guī)模的大小以及輔業(yè)剝離的數(shù)量。并分析國(guó)家電網(wǎng)主輔分離的有效性以及福利效應(yīng),認(rèn)為國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司進(jìn)行主輔分離可以增加消費(fèi)者福利,進(jìn)而增加社會(huì)總福利。最后,在結(jié)合國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司進(jìn)行主輔分離過(guò)程中可能遇到的障礙,有針對(duì)性的提出幾點(diǎn)建議。本論文從理論上彌補(bǔ)了關(guān)于電網(wǎng)企業(yè)主輔分離研究的不足,也從實(shí)踐上加深了對(duì)市場(chǎng)化改革背景下電網(wǎng)企業(yè)主輔業(yè)分離的認(rèn)識(shí)和理解。希望能為國(guó)家電網(wǎng)公司下一步主輔業(yè)分離改革方案提供一定理論依據(jù)。
[Abstract]:Since the State Council put forward the four missions of electric power system reform, China's electric power system reform has been advancing steadily year by year. In the past 13 years, many gratifying achievements have been made, and at the same time many problems have been exposed, such as the incomplete separation of main and auxiliary products. The transmission and distribution are not separated and the electricity price mechanism is not perfect. One of the important factors restricting the reform is that the separation of main and auxiliary power grid has not been completely solved. The separation of main and auxiliary is the premise of separation of transmission and distribution, and the separation of transmission and distribution is the guarantee of the formation of reasonable electricity price mechanism. Although the State Grid has stripped fire, hydropower construction, power exploration and design, and electric power repair enterprises from its main business, some of the divestitures are basically low economic benefits and low industry concentration. And most of the main industry is not closely linked with the subsidiary industry assets. State Grid has no plans to spin off the auxiliary and various third-line industries that are closely linked to grid companies. And the State Grid Company's acquisition of Pinggao, the leading enterprise in the manufacturing of two major electrical equipment, is the retrograde move of the separation of main and auxiliary reform. Therefore, to continue to carry out the main and auxiliary state grid reform is the most important part of the current power reform, should not be underestimated. Based on the analysis of practical problems, this paper reviews the reform process of China's electric power system from three aspects: the reform process, the results achieved and the existing problems. It is concluded that the main and auxiliary power reform in China is not completely separated, and the transmission and distribution is not separated. The power grid has the exclusive right to buy and sell electricity, and the electricity price can not reflect the supply and demand. In this paper, the main and auxiliary industries of the State Grid are divided into three categories, including non-commercial assets, power auxiliary enterprises and diversified enterprises. This paper summarizes the achievements of the separation of the main and auxiliary parts of the State Grid Company at present, and points out that there are still some remaining problems such as the incomplete reform of the separation of the main and auxiliary, the new monopoly brought by the reorganization of the group and the lack of supervision mechanism. The innovation of this paper is the introduction of bidding mechanism in the process of disposal of the auxiliary industry assets by the State Grid, the establishment of a game model by using the research method of combining theory with practice, and the qualitative and quantitative research on the basis of cost and profit function. The paper simulates the process of the domestic enterprises participating in the bidding of the subsidiary industry assets in detail. It is considered that the different bidding results depend on the size of the market and the number of the subsidiary industries. By analyzing the effectiveness and welfare effect of the separation of main and auxiliary parts in State Grid, it is concluded that the separation of main and secondary parts of State Grid Company can increase consumer welfare and then increase the total social welfare. Finally, in combination with the state grid company in the main-auxiliary separation process may meet obstacles, targeted to put forward a few suggestions. This paper makes up for the deficiency of the research on the separation of main and auxiliary enterprises in theory, and also deepens the understanding of the separation of main and auxiliary enterprises in the background of market-oriented reform in practice. It is hoped that it can provide some theoretical basis for the next reform plan of the separation of main and auxiliary industries of the State Grid Company.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F426.61

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 張曦;周方召;;資產(chǎn)剝離的合意性:基于消費(fèi)者福利標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的分析[J];財(cái)經(jīng)研究;2010年12期

2 張馳;;國(guó)際電力體制改革經(jīng)驗(yàn)及對(duì)中國(guó)的啟發(fā)[J];電力技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì);2007年01期

，

本文編號(hào)：1854064