本文選題：紅層 + 水文地質(zhì)特征�。� 參考：《成都理工大學(xué)》2016年碩士論文

【摘要】：四川省紅層丘陵區(qū)是四川主要的農(nóng)業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū),水資源匱乏,且供需矛盾突出,農(nóng)村生活飲用水以分散式淺水井為主,普遍存在量缺質(zhì)差、抗旱能力弱的問(wèn)題。恩陽(yáng)區(qū)屬于典型的川北紅層丘陵區(qū),恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的水資源問(wèn)題同樣是困擾其發(fā)展的大問(wèn)題。近年來(lái)隨著紅層區(qū)打井工程在恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的實(shí)施,解決了部分地區(qū)的飲水問(wèn)題,暫時(shí)緩解了水資源緊張問(wèn)題,但缺乏對(duì)地下水特征和水資源的系統(tǒng)研究。論文研究了恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的地下水特征和水資源安全問(wèn)題,為恩陽(yáng)區(qū)水資源開(kāi)采的合理規(guī)劃和水資源安全問(wèn)題提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。論文首先介紹了研究區(qū)概況和紅層介質(zhì)的特征,然后從地下水類型、地下水賦存規(guī)律、地下水的補(bǔ)、徑、排關(guān)系等方面分析了恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的水文地質(zhì)特征,并劃分水文地質(zhì)單元,接著論文從水質(zhì)和水量?jī)蓚�(gè)方面分析恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的水資源狀況,最后用層次分析法研究了恩陽(yáng)區(qū)水資源安全問(wèn)題。水質(zhì)評(píng)價(jià)從地下水安全和生活飲用水安全兩個(gè)方面進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),采用綜合評(píng)價(jià)法評(píng)價(jià)地下水安全;水量評(píng)價(jià)從天然補(bǔ)給量、儲(chǔ)存量和開(kāi)采量三個(gè)方面分別評(píng)價(jià)其保證程度,并分別用降雨保證率、利用更新率和利用率評(píng)價(jià)天然補(bǔ)給量、儲(chǔ)存量和開(kāi)采量。論文獲得的主要研究成果有:(1)通過(guò)對(duì)恩陽(yáng)區(qū)地下水的調(diào)查和結(jié)合區(qū)域水文地質(zhì)報(bào)告分析,確定地下水類型為松散層孔隙水、層間裂隙水和基巖裂隙水三大類,其中松散層孔隙水又可細(xì)分為第四系沖洪積孔隙水、殘坡積孔隙水和崩坡積孔隙水。(2)通過(guò)對(duì)恩陽(yáng)區(qū)地下水補(bǔ)、徑、排關(guān)系研究,研究區(qū)主要有庫(kù)塘補(bǔ)給井型、崩積區(qū)補(bǔ)給井型和層間裂隙補(bǔ)給井型三種模式,以庫(kù)塘補(bǔ)水給井型分布最廣,并對(duì)三種類型的補(bǔ)、徑、排關(guān)系進(jìn)行研究。(3)論文的抽水試驗(yàn)分別在富水段和貧水段進(jìn)行,抽水試驗(yàn)涵蓋了主要的水文地質(zhì)單元,分析抽水試驗(yàn)的數(shù)據(jù)得到富水段滲透系數(shù)為0.1~0.2m/d和貧水段滲透性系數(shù)為0.012~0.082m/d,富水段影響半徑為30~55m,貧水段影響半徑為0.3~3.8m。(4)根據(jù)研究區(qū)地貌類型及地層巖性特征等控制因素,將區(qū)內(nèi)儲(chǔ)水單元主要?jiǎng)澐譃樗念?即:桌狀山型儲(chǔ)水單元、窄谷梁狀山型儲(chǔ)水單元、陡傾斜單面山型儲(chǔ)水單元和寬谷深丘型儲(chǔ)水單元;研究了各類儲(chǔ)水單元的水文地質(zhì)特征及水質(zhì)水量情況。(5)研究區(qū)共采取40個(gè)水樣,水樣分析得到地下水化學(xué)類型:HCO3-Ca型水樣共有28組,HCO3-Ca·Mg有7組,HCO3-Na·Ca有2組,HCO3-Ca·Na·Mg有2組,只有一組水樣HCO3-Na。用綜合評(píng)價(jià)法評(píng)價(jià)水質(zhì)結(jié)果:17個(gè)水樣達(dá)到良好及以上標(biāo)準(zhǔn),23個(gè)水樣屬于較差和極差標(biāo)準(zhǔn);采用生活飲用水標(biāo)準(zhǔn)評(píng)價(jià)水質(zhì),不達(dá)標(biāo)的要素主要為鐵、錳和氨氮超標(biāo),鐵和錳超標(biāo)地區(qū)地下水應(yīng)做處理后才可飲用,氨氮超標(biāo)地區(qū)應(yīng)盡量避開(kāi)農(nóng)田污染區(qū)取水。(6)研究區(qū)用大氣降雨入滲法計(jì)算得到的天然補(bǔ)給量為5733×104m3,用容積法計(jì)算得到的存儲(chǔ)量為892.8×104m3,用均勻布井法計(jì)算得到的可采資源量為406.8×104m3。水量評(píng)價(jià)時(shí),天然補(bǔ)給量、儲(chǔ)存量和開(kāi)采量分別用不同保證率、更新率和保證率對(duì)其進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),在這三種方法評(píng)價(jià)下研究區(qū)水資源的保證程度都較高,在近期遠(yuǎn)期規(guī)劃中地下水的開(kāi)采量是合理的。(7)論文用層次分析法研究了恩陽(yáng)區(qū)的水資源安全問(wèn)題。首先建立安全評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,在指標(biāo)體系基礎(chǔ)上構(gòu)造判斷矩陣,然后用MATLAB計(jì)算各指標(biāo)層對(duì)目標(biāo)層的相對(duì)權(quán)重,直接建立安全評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)并確定各指標(biāo)的安全度等分,最后通過(guò)各指標(biāo)的權(quán)重和等全度等分計(jì)算出水資源安全評(píng)價(jià)綜合值。最終恩陽(yáng)區(qū)水資源安全評(píng)價(jià)綜合值為61,達(dá)到相對(duì)安全的程度,說(shuō)明恩陽(yáng)區(qū)目前水資源利用是相對(duì)安全合理的。
[Abstract]:The red layer hilly area of Sichuan province is the main agricultural economic zone in Sichuan. The water resources are scarce and the contradiction between supply and demand is very prominent. The rural living drinking water is mainly scattered shallow water wells, and there is a widespread problem of poor quality and poor quality and weak drought resistance. In recent years, with the implementation of the drilling project in the red zone, the drinking water problem in some areas has been solved, and the water resources shortage is temporarily relieved, but there is no systematic study on the characteristics of groundwater and water resources. The paper studies the characteristics of the groundwater and the safety of water resources in the area of en Yang District, which is reasonable for the exploitation of water resources in the area. This paper first introduces the general situation of the research area and the characteristics of the red layer medium, and then analyzes the hydrogeological characteristics of the area from the groundwater type, the law of groundwater occurrence, the supplement, the diameter and the row relation of the groundwater, and divides the hydrogeological unit, then the paper from the water quality and the water quantity of two. The water resources security of en Yang district is analyzed by analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The water quality evaluation is evaluated from two aspects of the safety of groundwater and the safety of drinking water, and the comprehensive evaluation method is used to evaluate the safety of groundwater, and the water evaluation is evaluated from three aspects of natural supply, storage and mining. The main research results obtained in this paper are as follows: (1) through the investigation of the groundwater in the inyang district and the analysis of the regional hydrogeological reports, the groundwater type is loose pore water, interlayer fissure water and base. There are three major categories of rock fissure water, in which the pore water of the loose layer can be subdivided into quaternary flushing pore water, residual slope and pore water. (2) through the study of the groundwater supplement, diameter and row relationship in the nyang District, the study area mainly includes the reservoir pool supply well type, the recharge well type and the interlayer fissure supply well type in the area of three types, and the reservoir pool is supplied to the water. The well distribution is the most widely distributed, and the relationship between the three types of filling, diameter and discharge is studied. (3) the pumping test in the paper is carried out in the rich water and poor water sections. The pumping test covers the main hydrogeological units, and the analysis of the data of the pumping test is that the permeability coefficient of the rich water section is 0.1~ 0.2m/d and the permeability coefficient of the poor water section is 0.012~0.082m/d, and the water rich is rich. The influence radius of the section is 30~55m, the influence radius of the poor water section is 0.3~3.8m. (4). According to the geomorphic types and lithologic characteristics of the study area, the water storage units in the area are divided into four types, that is, the table mountain type water storage unit, the narrow valley beam like mountain type water storage unit, the steep inclined single side mountain type water storage unit and the wide valley deep hilly type water storage unit; Hydrogeological characteristics and water quality and water quantity of all kinds of water storage units. (5) 40 water samples were adopted in the study area, and water samples were analyzed. There were 28 groups of HCO3-Ca water samples, 7 groups of HCO3-Ca. Mg, 2 groups of HCO3-Na. Ca, 2 groups of HCO3-Ca. Na. Mg, only one group of water samples were evaluated by the comprehensive evaluation method of water quality: 17 water The sample reached the standard of good and above, 23 water samples were of poor and extreme standard; the water quality was evaluated by the standard of drinking water. The main elements of the water quality were iron, manganese and ammonia over the standard. The groundwater should be drinkable in the area of iron and manganese exceeding the standard. The area of ammonia nitrogen exceeding the standard should be avoided in the polluted area of farmland. (6) the study area used atmospheric drop. The amount of natural recharge calculated by rain infiltration method is 5733 x 104m3, and the storage amount calculated by the volume method is 892.8 x 104m3. The amount of recoverable resources calculated by uniform well distribution method is 406.8 * 104m3. water evaluation, and the natural recharge, storage and mining amount are evaluated with different guarantee rate, renewal rate and guarantee rate respectively. The three methods evaluate the degree of water resources in the study area is high, in the short-term long-term planning of groundwater exploitation is reasonable. (7) the paper uses analytic hierarchy process to study the safety of water resources in the area. First, establish the safety evaluation index system, construct judgment matrix on the basis of the index system, and then use MATLAB to calculate each finger. The relative weight of the target layer to the target layer, the safety evaluation standard is set up directly and the safety degree of each index is determined. Finally, the comprehensive value of water resources safety evaluation is calculated by the weight of each index and equal degree of equal degree. Finally, the comprehensive value of water resources safety evaluation is 61, and the degree of phase to safety is reached, and the current water resources in the area are explained. It is relatively safe and reasonable to use.

【學(xué)位授予單位】：成都理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2016
【分類號(hào)】：P641.8

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 趙琳琳;肖長(zhǎng)來(lái);陳昌亮;陳章;梁玉思;;基于抽水試驗(yàn)的多種方法確定水文地質(zhì)參數(shù)[J];地下空間與工程學(xué)報(bào);2015年02期

2 梁興軍;鄭昭佩;周慧;王文華;;基于層次分析法的陜西省水資源安全評(píng)價(jià)[J];魯東大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年02期

3 朱慧秦;朱永偉;謝萬(wàn)兵;;對(duì)水文地質(zhì)中“影響半徑”的討論[J];西部探礦工程;2013年03期

4 王曉東;梁波;解征帆;;四川省紅層丘陵區(qū)淺層地下水水質(zhì)現(xiàn)狀及評(píng)價(jià)[J];四川環(huán)境;2012年S1期

5 黃方;劉瓊穎;何麗娟;;晚喜山期以來(lái)四川盆地構(gòu)造-熱演化模擬[J];地球物理學(xué)報(bào);2012年11期

6 陳倩;李長(zhǎng)順;鐘金先;;四川紅層淺層風(fēng)化帶裂隙水水化學(xué)特征的聚類分析[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2012年02期

7 張臻;王龍昌;楊松;孫凡;梅瀟霄;黨甲軍;;基于AHP法的四川省水資源可持續(xù)利用綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];干旱地區(qū)農(nóng)業(yè)研究;2009年04期

8 張福存;鄢毅;劉安云;李旭峰;;西南紅層淺層地下水特征及其開(kāi)發(fā)利用模式[J];水文地質(zhì)工程地質(zhì);2008年03期

9 蘇培東;文敏;袁勇;;川中紅層區(qū)地下水特征及勘探開(kāi)發(fā)方法探討[J];水文;2007年04期

10 程乖梅;何士華;;基于改進(jìn)層次分析法的云南省水資源可持續(xù)利用評(píng)價(jià)[J];云南水力發(fā)電;2006年04期

，

本文編號(hào)：1824620