本文選題：旅游度假區(qū) + 景觀資源��； 參考：《福建農(nóng)林大學(xué)》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展和人們生活水平的日益提高,人們想遠(yuǎn)離鋼筋混凝土,回歸大自然的愿望日益強(qiáng)烈。就目前旅游度假區(qū)發(fā)展的現(xiàn)狀來(lái)看,旅游度假區(qū)的作用似乎只是停留在供人們旅游觀光,對(duì)其更深層的景觀、經(jīng)濟(jì)、文化和社會(huì)價(jià)值的了解確越來(lái)越少,對(duì)眾多旅游度假區(qū)的破壞性開發(fā)關(guān)注甚少,旅游度假區(qū)景觀負(fù)價(jià)值的出現(xiàn)以及環(huán)境承載力和景觀資源的保護(hù)也沒能引起人們的足夠重視。許多旅游度假區(qū)目前都存在擁有較多資源卻無(wú)法將其轉(zhuǎn)換成優(yōu)質(zhì)景觀的現(xiàn)象,景觀資源未受到合理的配置和利用,景區(qū)資源的保護(hù)更新工作沒有落實(shí)到實(shí)處,造成景區(qū)景觀負(fù)價(jià)值的出現(xiàn)從而導(dǎo)致景觀資源的浪費(fèi)。因此,對(duì)景區(qū)具有負(fù)價(jià)值的景觀改造及更新顯得尤為重要。 本研究針對(duì)鼓嶺旅游度假區(qū)的核心景區(qū)即鼓嶺避暑古鎮(zhèn)區(qū)的景觀資源進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),采用層次分析法(AHP法)和模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法,以調(diào)查問卷的形式收集數(shù)據(jù),從游客的角度出發(fā),把握游客對(duì)景區(qū)各景觀資源的需求度,建立客觀專業(yè)的評(píng)價(jià)體系,運(yùn)用DPS數(shù)據(jù)分析軟件對(duì)調(diào)查數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行處理,最終得到景區(qū)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果,根據(jù)評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果結(jié)合景區(qū)景觀資源現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)其存在的景觀優(yōu)勢(shì)及景觀劣勢(shì)加以分析,對(duì)景區(qū)存在的負(fù)價(jià)值景觀進(jìn)行改造,進(jìn)一步完善景區(qū)的景觀質(zhì)量。 本研究的主要內(nèi)容包括：(1)針對(duì)鼓嶺旅游度假區(qū)景觀資源評(píng)價(jià)及負(fù)價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)換的內(nèi)容,簡(jiǎn)述與本研究相關(guān)的理論基礎(chǔ)；(2)通過(guò)查閱大量文獻(xiàn),選用定性與定量相結(jié)合的評(píng)價(jià)方法對(duì)鼓嶺度假區(qū)景觀資源進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),在詢問專家意見的基礎(chǔ)上選取了23評(píng)價(jià)因子標(biāo)并建立了鼓嶺旅游度假區(qū)鼓嶺避暑古鎮(zhèn)區(qū)的景觀資源評(píng)價(jià)體系；(3)運(yùn)用AHP法和模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法對(duì)景區(qū)7個(gè)有代表性的景點(diǎn)評(píng)價(jià),調(diào)查問卷的數(shù)據(jù)運(yùn)用DPS數(shù)據(jù)分析系統(tǒng)進(jìn)行處理,得到的最終結(jié)果結(jié)合景區(qū)資源的現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)存在的負(fù)價(jià)值景觀進(jìn)行分析討論,針對(duì)價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)換提出相應(yīng)的意見與建議,為景區(qū)的發(fā)展提供理論指導(dǎo)。 本研究的結(jié)論包括：(1)建立了科學(xué)的景觀資源評(píng)價(jià)體系,體系分為綜合評(píng)價(jià)層、評(píng)價(jià)因素層和評(píng)價(jià)因子層三層,共選取了相關(guān)的23個(gè)評(píng)價(jià)因子(2)運(yùn)用定性與定量分析想結(jié)合的方法進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),定量分析選擇AHP法與模糊綜合分析法結(jié)合,客觀的對(duì)景區(qū)現(xiàn)狀進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià),并對(duì)景區(qū)負(fù)價(jià)值景觀進(jìn)行價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)換；(3)結(jié)合評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果和景區(qū)現(xiàn)狀,對(duì)景區(qū)的發(fā)展提出意見和建議,使景區(qū)規(guī)范健康的發(fā)展。
[Abstract]:With the development of economy and the improvement of people's living standard, people want to stay away from reinforced concrete and return to nature. In view of the current situation of the development of tourist resorts, the role of tourist resorts seems to be confined to providing people with sightseeing, with less and less understanding of their deeper landscape, economic, cultural and social values. Little attention has been paid to the destructive development of many tourist resorts, and the negative value of tourist resorts and the protection of environmental carrying capacity and landscape resources have not been paid enough attention to. At present, many tourist resorts have the phenomenon that they have more resources but can not convert them into high-quality landscapes. The landscape resources have not been reasonably allocated and utilized, and the protection and renewal of scenic resources have not been carried out in practice. The occurrence of negative value of scenic spots leads to the waste of landscape resources. Therefore, it is very important to renovate and renew the landscape with negative value. This study is aimed at the evaluation of landscape resources in the core scenic spot of Guling tourist Resort, that is, the ancient town area of Guling Summer Resort. The AHP method and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are used to collect the data in the form of questionnaire, and from the perspective of tourists, the method of AHP (Analytic hierarchy process) and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method are adopted. Grasp the tourists' demand for each landscape resource, establish an objective and professional evaluation system, use DPS data analysis software to process the survey data, and finally get the comprehensive evaluation results of the scenic spot. According to the evaluation results combined with the present situation of landscape resources, the advantages and disadvantages of the landscape were analyzed, the negative value of the landscape was transformed, and the landscape quality of the scenic area was further improved. The main contents of this study include: (1) aiming at the content of landscape resources evaluation and negative value conversion in Guling tourist Resort, the theoretical basis related to this study is briefly described. The qualitative and quantitative evaluation methods are used to evaluate the landscape resources of Guling Resort. On the basis of asking experts' opinions, 23 evaluation factors were selected and the evaluation system of landscape resources in Guling ancient town area of Guling Resort was established. The AHP method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method were used to evaluate 7 representative scenic spots. The data of the questionnaire are processed by DPS data analysis system, and the final results are analyzed and discussed according to the present situation of scenic area resources, and the corresponding opinions and suggestions for value conversion are put forward. To provide theoretical guidance for the development of scenic spots. The conclusion of this study includes: (1) A scientific evaluation system of landscape resources is established. The system is divided into three layers: comprehensive evaluation layer, evaluation factor layer and evaluation factor layer. A total of 23 related evaluation factors are selected: qualitative and quantitative analysis method is used to evaluate, and AHP method and fuzzy comprehensive analysis method are used to evaluate the present situation of scenic spot objectively. Combined with the evaluation result and the present situation of the scenic spot, the author puts forward some suggestions and suggestions on the development of the scenic spot, so as to standardize the healthy development of the scenic spot.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：福建農(nóng)林大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2014
【分類號(hào)】：P901;F592.7

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 俞孔堅(jiān),葉正,李迪華,段鐵武;論城市景觀生態(tài)過(guò)程與格局的連續(xù)性——以中山市為例[J];城市規(guī)劃;1998年04期

2 肖篤寧;解伏菊;魏建兵;;景觀價(jià)值與景觀保護(hù)評(píng)價(jià)[J];地理科學(xué);2006年04期

3 楊定海,彭重華,羅麗華;岳麓山風(fēng)景名勝區(qū)景觀資源綜合評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];福建林業(yè)科技;2004年01期

4 葉遼源;;白水寨風(fēng)景名勝區(qū)旅游資源評(píng)價(jià)及開發(fā)利用策略[J];廣東林業(yè)科技;2005年04期

5 鐘全林,周華盛;森林景觀質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)理論、內(nèi)容與方法[J];華東森林經(jīng)理;2000年04期

6 田文;;城市背面景觀的價(jià)值實(shí)現(xiàn)[J];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2010年06期

7 張哲;韓凝玉;;負(fù)景觀的價(jià)值轉(zhuǎn)換——廢棄石宕口景觀價(jià)值的重新審視[J];建筑與文化;2010年07期

8 張潔;辛建榮;成金華;;基于模糊數(shù)學(xué)的旅游地現(xiàn)實(shí)形象評(píng)價(jià)系統(tǒng)[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2003年13期

9 吳承照,曹霞;景觀資源量化評(píng)價(jià)的主要方法(模型)——綜述及比較[J];旅游科學(xué);2005年01期

10 張致勝;風(fēng)景資源調(diào)查評(píng)價(jià)方法的研究[J];林業(yè)資源管理;1993年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 劉福智;城市景觀再生設(shè)計(jì)的理論及策略研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2009年

2 劉敏;泰山風(fēng)景名勝區(qū)景觀資源評(píng)價(jià)和景觀營(yíng)造研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1802605