本文選題：人工智能 + 治理　； 參考：《中國行政管理》2017年10期

【摘要】：人工智能的興起不僅是技術(shù)或產(chǎn)業(yè)領(lǐng)域的重大發(fā)展,更是經(jīng)濟(jì)、社會、政治各領(lǐng)域的基礎(chǔ)性和綜合性變革,由此產(chǎn)生的治理挑戰(zhàn)要求公共政策框架的重構(gòu)與創(chuàng)新,而這又體現(xiàn)為三個基本問題。首先在技術(shù)層面,人工智能的核心是算法與數(shù)據(jù),其內(nèi)在邏輯是基于機(jī)器學(xué)習(xí)形成自主決策。其次,傳統(tǒng)科層治理結(jié)構(gòu)、方法以及范圍不能應(yīng)對新的變化,從而構(gòu)成了人工智能時代的治理挑戰(zhàn)。各國現(xiàn)有政策所遵循的"無需批準(zhǔn)式監(jiān)管"或"審慎監(jiān)管"邏輯固然有其合理性,但卻局限于"創(chuàng)新"與"安全"的二維選擇而失于片面。最后,本文提出綜合性公共政策框架,力圖為人工智能時代的崛起建立制度基石。
[Abstract]:The rise of artificial intelligence is not only a major development in the field of technology or industry, but also a fundamental and comprehensive change in economic, social and political fields. The resulting governance challenges require the reconstruction and innovation of the public policy framework. This, in turn, is reflected in three basic issues. Firstly, at the technical level, the core of artificial intelligence is algorithm and data, and its internal logic is based on machine learning to form independent decision. Secondly, the traditional governance structure, methods and scope can not cope with the new changes, thus constituting the governance challenges in the era of artificial intelligence. The logic of "no approval supervision" or "prudential supervision" followed by the existing policies of various countries is reasonable, but it is limited to the two-dimensional choice of "innovation" and "safety" and is not one-sided. Finally, this paper puts forward a comprehensive public policy framework, trying to establish the institutional foundation for the rise of artificial intelligence era.
【作者單位】： 電子科技大學(xué)政治與公共管理學(xué)院;清華大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【基金】：首都師范大學(xué)文化研究院重大研究項目“‘互聯(lián)網(wǎng)+城市治理’:智慧城市2.0的理論”(編號:ICS-2016-A-03)
【分類號】：TP18
，

本文編號：1934838