塔里木盆地庫(kù)車前陸沖斷帶不同構(gòu)造樣式裂縫發(fā)育規(guī)律:證據(jù)來自野外構(gòu)造裂縫露頭觀測(cè)
[Abstract]:Natural fractures in reservoir have an important influence on oil and gas productivity, but because of the limited downhole data, it is generally difficult to determine the heterogeneity of fracture system distribution network by relying only on downhole data, and it is also difficult to obtain a large number of static parameters of fracture numerical simulation, so the quantitative evaluation of fractures is facing great challenges. The typical structural styles in the outcrop area of Kuqa Foreland thrust belt are selected to describe the unique fracture development and distribution characteristics under different structural styles (that is, thrust nappe monoclinic, high angle thrust compression anticlinal, basement occlusion slippage anticlinine), and to explore the law of fracture development under different structural styles. The results show that the thrust nappe monoclinic develops the second stage fracture, the strike is mainly north-west, mainly the late vertical opening joint, the early high angle oblique joint is semi-filled and fully filled by calcite, and the fracture surface density tends to decrease from the core to the wing. There are three stage cracks in the high angle thrust compression anticlinal, mainly in the north west direction and west direction. The early fractures are basically filled with calcite, the cracks are opened in the middle and late stage, and the single sand body is cut through and converges to the plane, which has obvious layer control. The steep wing cracks of anticlinal are stronger than those of slow wing, showing asymmetrical distribution law. The basement occlusive slip anticlinal is strongly squeezed by the first wing to develop two stage high angle oblique open fractures, and the fracture direction is north-west and east-east, and the deformation of blocked one-wing sandstone is weak, and no obvious cracks are found. The law of fracture development under different structural styles is of great significance to the numerical simulation of fractures and the prediction of favorable reservoir distribution.
【作者單位】: 中國(guó)石油天然氣股份有限公司杭州地質(zhì)研究院;中國(guó)石油西南油氣田公司重慶氣礦;
【基金】:國(guó)家“十三五”重大科技專項(xiàng)(編號(hào):2016ZX05003-001)資助
【分類號(hào)】:P618.13
【相似文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 劉金華;楊少春;楊柏;黃建廷;;彩南油田彩003井區(qū)小型構(gòu)造樣式[J];大慶石油地質(zhì)與開發(fā);2008年05期
2 周子群;趙麗平;徐梅;;青東凹陷構(gòu)造特征及構(gòu)造樣式分析[J];內(nèi)蒙古石油化工;2012年09期
3 文德修;;六盤水地區(qū)控煤構(gòu)造樣式與賦煤規(guī)律[J];西部探礦工程;2013年11期
4 徐會(huì)永;蔣有錄;張立強(qiáng);王金友;歐陽(yáng)睿;;查干凹陷構(gòu)造樣式及其構(gòu)造演化[J];油氣地質(zhì)與采收率;2008年04期
5 于慧玲;;天山南地區(qū)構(gòu)造樣式和演化特征分析[J];石油物探;2008年03期
6 賴江德;張進(jìn)鐸;蔡?hào)|地;楊廣琴;張素紅;;緬甸M區(qū)塊地震構(gòu)造樣式分析與研究[J];物探與化探;2009年01期
7 梁慧社,劉和甫;新疆塔里木盆地構(gòu)造樣式研究[J];河北地質(zhì)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);1996年Z1期
8 李煥同;王林杰;曹代勇;;湖南漣邵煤田控煤構(gòu)造樣式研究[J];河北工程大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年01期
9 王明健;張訓(xùn)華;何登發(fā);張運(yùn)波;孫衍鵬;李文濤;;臨清拗陷東部構(gòu)造樣式及其形成演化[J];大慶石油學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2012年03期
10 張德高;劉特輝;徐紅霞;曹代勇;;廣東省興梅煤田控煤構(gòu)造樣式及其控煤意義研究[J];中國(guó)煤炭地質(zhì);2012年08期
相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前3條
1 朱銳;郭建華;曠理雄;王明艷;;湘中漣源凹陷構(gòu)造樣式與演化史分析[A];中國(guó)西部復(fù)雜油氣藏地質(zhì)與勘探技術(shù)研討會(huì)論文集[C];2006年
2 李愿軍;李s,
本文編號(hào):2503193
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/shiyounenyuanlunwen/2503193.html