深水鉆井氣侵井控風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析
[Abstract]:Well bore pressure control in deep water drilling, especially in deep water high pressure gas formation, is one of the key factors related to drilling safety. In order to evaluate the well control risk and risk intensity under different formation and construction conditions, we can accurately grasp the law of wellbore pressure change, gas rise and volume change, well overflow flow growth, and well control risk and risk intensity under different formation and construction conditions caused by gas invasion during drilling and well killing. It is of great significance to make reasonable well control risk prevention and well-killing measures. In this paper, aiming at the risk evaluation of gas invasion control in deep water drilling, on the basis of systematic investigation and research on wellbore temperature, pressure calculation method and risk assessment method during drilling and well control, theoretical analysis is carried out. The calculation model of wellbore temperature and pressure during deep water drilling and gas invasion control is established, and the variation law of bottom hole pressure, mud pool increment and overflow discovery time during drilling gas invasion overflow is analyzed. The variation characteristics of casing pressure in the process of well-killing under different gas reservoir characteristics and well-killing parameters are studied. According to the pressure bearing capacity of wellhead device, casing resistance to internal pressure and formation fracture pressure condition, three levels of distinguishing well control risk "safety, relative danger and danger" are established. Well control risk analysis of NH3-2 well in the east of South China Sea is carried out. The results show that formation permeability, bottom hole pressure difference, overflow discovery time and mud pool increment are the main factors affecting the difficulty of well control. For NH3-2 well, the overflow flow is controlled within 0.6m3 as a safe area, the overflow flow between 0.6m3 and 8.4m3 is a relative dangerous area, and the overflow amount exceeds 8.4m3 as a dangerous area. The research results provide a means for predicting the difficulty of gas invasion control in deep water drilling, reasonably determining the limit of overflow alarm and making the measures of well killing.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:中國(guó)石油大學(xué)(華東)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類號(hào)】:TE52
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 方傳新;紀(jì)永強(qiáng);金業(yè)權(quán);;幾種常用鉆井風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)方法的比較[J];中國(guó)石油和化工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與質(zhì)量;2012年10期
2 褚道余;;深水井控工藝技術(shù)探討[J];石油鉆探技術(shù);2012年01期
3 孫寶江;王志遠(yuǎn);公培斌;宋榮榮;;深水井控的七組分多相流動(dòng)模型[J];石油學(xué)報(bào);2011年06期
4 隋秀香;尹邦堂;張興全;任美鵬;李相方;;含硫油氣井井控技術(shù)及管理方法[J];中國(guó)安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2011年10期
5 何麗新;王功偉;;移動(dòng)式鉆井平臺(tái)油污損害賠償責(zé)任限制問(wèn)題研究——由墨西哥灣溢油事故鉆井平臺(tái)適用責(zé)任限制引發(fā)的思考[J];太平洋學(xué)報(bào);2011年07期
6 李丹華;姜東琪;;AGA8-92DC計(jì)算方法天然氣壓縮因子計(jì)算[J];煤氣與熱力;2011年03期
7 何沙;王志明;;基于層次分析法的高含硫氣井鉆井風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)研究[J];鉆采工藝;2010年02期
8 孫建華;;綜合層次分析法評(píng)價(jià)模型在項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)估中的應(yīng)用[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2009年23期
9 錢小東;劉祖德;;基于AHP的海上油氣鉆井風(fēng)險(xiǎn)模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];安全與環(huán)境工程;2009年04期
10 張鐵軍;賈曉剛;;基于IOWA算子的鉆井工程風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)因素重要度計(jì)算[J];西部探礦工程;2009年03期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 孫連偉;深井井身結(jié)構(gòu)設(shè)計(jì)中回接尾管的條件及準(zhǔn)則分析[D];中國(guó)石油大學(xué)(華東);2013年
,本文編號(hào):2232560
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/shiyounenyuanlunwen/2232560.html