基于QRA的某轉(zhuǎn)油站系統(tǒng)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)及控制研究
[Abstract]:The oil and gas gathering and transporting station is the key production project of oil field surface engineering construction. As an important process section of gathering and transportation system, the medium transmitted and treated has high risk characteristics, such as flammable and explosive, etc. Once the station pressure equipment failure leakage is easy to lead to high-risk accidents. Based on the production characteristics of old and old transfer stations in our country, and on the basis of the research of domestic and foreign scholars on the risk analysis of accident consequences, the QRA (quantitative risk Analysis) evaluation method is established in this paper. Based on the statistical analysis of typical oil and gas safety accidents in China, the leakage of medium leads to combustion and explosion, and the accident rate of poisoning is as high as 85%. Based on the analysis of the hazardous factors of the process, the unit division of the transfer station system in China is carried out, and the critical equipment with high risk is identified. (2) the QRA calculation method of the key pressure vessel in different phase state medium is determined. Based on the international petrochemical industry accident database and combined with the actual production situation of domestic transfer stations, the probability correction calculation method is put forward to determine the leakage frequency of containers to be evaluated. (3) the heavy gas cloud diffusion caused by equipment leakage in the transfer stations is constructed. A tree of consequence events such as fire and explosion. The leakage rate and leakage amount under different leakage conditions are determined according to the law of fluid movement under the condition that the basic parameters of the transfer station field are constant in different intervention time. The damage range of thermal radiation and overpressure was calculated by QRA method. Combined with the social environment around the special station yard, the personal risk and the distribution value of social risk are analyzed. (4) the personal risk contour and the F-N curve of social risk are simulated and verified by Phast Risk software. To determine the range of risk levels with reference to the acceptable risk levels specified in the relevant standards. The effective control measures to reduce the accident risk are put forward in view of the key equipment in the actual production, which provides the theoretical basis and technical support for the risk evaluation of the oil and gas gathering and transporting station. The reasonable and effective QRA evaluation based on the transfer station system can be effectively applied to the production site of oil and gas industry and provide scientific basis for reducing the accident risk. At the same time reduce casualties, environmental pollution and other consequences, improve the overall safety of the system production level.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:重慶科技學(xué)院
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:TE88
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 劉俊杰;;量化風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評估(QRA)在工程安全設(shè)計(jì)中的應(yīng)用[J];石油化工安全環(huán)保技術(shù);2013年04期
2 閆鳳霞;陳永芳;;池火災(zāi)評價(jià)法在集輸站場原油罐區(qū)安全評價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];價(jià)值工程;2013年01期
3 佟玲;楊亮;史國勝;;淺析油氣處理站的安全管理[J];吉林勞動(dòng)保護(hù);2012年10期
4 趙克勤;;轉(zhuǎn)油站工藝流程存在問題分析及對策[J];中國石油和化工標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與質(zhì)量;2012年S1期
5 孫燕君;錢瑜;張玉超;;蒙特卡洛分析在氯氣泄漏事故環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)中的應(yīng)用研究[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2011年11期
6 曹濤;張華兵;周利劍;鄭洪龍;程萬洲;;HAZOP在油氣管道站場風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析中的應(yīng)用實(shí)踐[J];中國安全生產(chǎn)科學(xué)技術(shù);2011年10期
7 苑靜;苗欣;;蒸氣云爆炸模型在原油儲(chǔ)罐火災(zāi)事故中的應(yīng)用研究[J];安全;2011年05期
8 向鵬成;孔得平;;工程項(xiàng)目風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究新視角——工程項(xiàng)目主體行為風(fēng)險(xiǎn)[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年03期
9 白永忠;;化工過程安全中的工藝危害分析方法綜述[J];安全、健康和環(huán)境;2010年02期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前8條
1 魏孔瑞;高含硫氣田集氣站風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)技術(shù)研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2015年
2 張璐陽;壓力容器風(fēng)險(xiǎn)定量評估方法API 581的改進(jìn)研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2014年
3 王德升;L-CNG工藝安全性研究[D];西南石油大學(xué);2014年
4 王明鳳;集輸場站量化風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)應(yīng)用研究[D];長江大學(xué);2012年
5 史俊文;大慶油田區(qū)塊產(chǎn)能建設(shè)工程重點(diǎn)危險(xiǎn)部位風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)[D];東北石油大學(xué);2012年
6 劉美磊;石油化工行業(yè)典型火災(zāi)事故數(shù)值模擬研究[D];中國石油大學(xué);2011年
7 顧文婷;油氣集輸過程重大危險(xiǎn)源的辨識及評價(jià)[D];蘭州理工大學(xué);2010年
8 張棟;大型石油罐區(qū)泄漏火災(zāi)事故環(huán)境風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評價(jià)應(yīng)用研究[D];首都經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2004年
,本文編號:2184921
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/shiyounenyuanlunwen/2184921.html