本文選題：范式 + 現(xiàn)代主義建筑　； 參考：《復旦大學》2013年碩士論文

【摘要】：20世紀現(xiàn)代主義建筑風靡全球,一改持續(xù)幾千年的古典建筑風格,以簡樸、經(jīng)濟和實惠為特點的現(xiàn)代主義建筑的藝術造型符合新的審美觀,表現(xiàn)出了工業(yè)化的精神。但到50年代時,原來二三十年代不少歐美建筑大師的作品經(jīng)過長期的沿用和各地的抄襲,到后來形成了千篇一律的教條。尤其是二戰(zhàn)后僵化了的國際式的盒子式建筑大同小異,缺乏藝術個性,出現(xiàn)了現(xiàn)代主義建筑危機。其后建筑師開始對單調的國際主義風格進行修正和改良,產(chǎn)生了有機主義、理性主義等晚期現(xiàn)代主義建筑風格。70年代便出現(xiàn)了“后現(xiàn)代主義”的方式對現(xiàn)代主義及國際主義風格進行大規(guī)模徹底的調整,之后出現(xiàn)的解構主義、新現(xiàn)代主義在建筑界也日益引起注意。現(xiàn)代建筑也登上了中國的建筑舞臺,出現(xiàn)了百態(tài)紛呈的格局。建筑理論直接影響著建筑設計和創(chuàng)作,對建筑流派及理論的反思是一件必要的事情。托馬斯·庫恩提出用范式概念來描述科學的發(fā)展。在建筑理論家勃勞德彭特看來建筑設計風格大致相當于科學上的“范式”。古典主義建筑向現(xiàn)代主義建筑轉變可以說是建筑發(fā)展中范式的革命。而從現(xiàn)代主義建筑發(fā)展至今,出現(xiàn)現(xiàn)代主義建筑危機之后,有人提出改良,有人提倡徹底改變,危機出現(xiàn)時人們采用了不同的處理策略。如今各種建筑流派各行其是,出現(xiàn)了較為混亂的局面,類似于范式理論中的前常規(guī)科學階段。古典建筑和現(xiàn)代建筑發(fā)生了革命性轉換,現(xiàn)代建筑在出現(xiàn)現(xiàn)代主義建筑危機后又發(fā)生了轉變,從范式的角度分析現(xiàn)代建筑的產(chǎn)生及發(fā)展,有助于我們更好地理解建筑的發(fā)展,指導建筑的發(fā)展方向。
[Abstract]:The modernist architecture of the 20th century is popular all over the world. The artistic modeling of modernist architecture, characterized by simplicity, economy and material benefit, conforms to the new aesthetic standards and shows the spirit of industrialization. However, in the 1950s, many European and American architecture masters in the 1920s and 1930s, after a long period of use and plagiarism, later formed the same dogma. Especially after World War II, the international box architecture, which became rigid after World War II, was similar, lacking artistic individuality and resulting in a crisis of modernist architecture. Then the architect began to modify and improve the monotonous style of internationalism, resulting in organism. The late modernist architectural style, such as rationalism, appeared in the 1970s in the form of "postmodernism", which made a large-scale and thorough adjustment to the style of modernism and internationalism, followed by deconstruction. New modernism also attracts more and more attention in architecture. Modern architecture also boarded the stage of construction in China, the emergence of a variety of patterns. Architectural theory has a direct impact on architectural design and creation. It is necessary to reflect on architectural schools and theories. Thomas Kuhn proposed the concept of paradigm to describe the development of science. In the view of architectural theorist Brad Pent, architectural design style is roughly equivalent to the scientific paradigm. The transformation from classical architecture to modern architecture is a revolution of architectural paradigm. From the development of modernism architecture to now, after the crisis of modernism architecture, some people put forward improvement, some advocated radical change, and when the crisis appeared, people adopted different treatment strategies. Nowadays, different schools of architecture are in disarray, similar to the pre-conventional scientific stage in paradigm theory. There has been a revolutionary transformation between classical architecture and modern architecture, and modern architecture has changed after the crisis of modernist architecture. Analyzing the emergence and development of modern architecture from the perspective of paradigm is helpful for us to better understand the development of architecture. To guide the development of architecture.
【學位授予單位】：復旦大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2013
【分類號】：TU-80

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前2條

1 彭怒;多元化的總體趨勢與新的主體文化的可能──戰(zhàn)后西方建筑思潮的演變[J];時代建筑;1999年04期

2 郭斌,蔡寧;從“科學范式”到“創(chuàng)新范式”:對范式范疇演進的評述[J];自然辯證法研究;1998年03期

，

本文編號：1785588