本文關(guān)鍵詞： DB總承包 評(píng)標(biāo) 指標(biāo)體系 層析分析法 模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)法　出處：《武漢理工大學(xué)》2013年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：設(shè)計(jì)施工總承包模式(Design-Build,簡(jiǎn)稱DB)在理論和實(shí)踐上都被證明是一種十分有效的工程建造模式,在國(guó)外得到了廣泛的應(yīng)用。在我國(guó),由于目前法律法規(guī)限制、業(yè)主顧慮以及DB項(xiàng)目本身的復(fù)雜性,DB總承包市場(chǎng)仍然處于初級(jí)和低水平發(fā)展階段。然而,建筑市場(chǎng)持續(xù)的發(fā)展,現(xiàn)代工程項(xiàng)目更新更高的需求以及政府部門大力推廣和業(yè)主的共識(shí),DB總承包定會(huì)成為發(fā)展的趨勢(shì)并具備廣闊的市場(chǎng)前景。 實(shí)踐經(jīng)驗(yàn)表明,能否恰當(dāng)?shù)剡x擇最具價(jià)值的DB總承包商是決定DB項(xiàng)目成功與否的關(guān)鍵。因此,如何建立一套系統(tǒng)、完備、客觀和可操作性強(qiáng)的DB項(xiàng)目招標(biāo)評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)體系已成為亟待解決的關(guān)鍵問題。 本文首先分析DB模式下的總承包類型,比較各承包類型之間的優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),確定將招標(biāo)范圍為從初步設(shè)計(jì)開始的DB總承包類型作為研究的對(duì)象。簡(jiǎn)要論述了DB總承包幾種常見的工程招標(biāo)方式和招標(biāo)程序,考慮結(jié)合擬建項(xiàng)目的特征、所屬行業(yè)DB總承包商的數(shù)量和建設(shè)能力、業(yè)主和DB總承包商之間的關(guān)系,以及不同招標(biāo)方式耗費(fèi)的時(shí)間、招標(biāo)費(fèi)用的大小等因素選擇最合適的招標(biāo)方式和程序。通過參考國(guó)內(nèi)外常用評(píng)標(biāo)程序,結(jié)合DB總承包的特點(diǎn)提出了適用于該模式的評(píng)標(biāo)程序,并分析得出綜合評(píng)標(biāo)法更適合選擇最佳DB總承包商。 然后,在決策理論和系統(tǒng)分析構(gòu)想的基礎(chǔ)上,以系統(tǒng)的思維方式和多屬性決策理論構(gòu)建DB總承包評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)體系,本文采用案例分析和文獻(xiàn)總結(jié)相結(jié)合的方式,分別從設(shè)計(jì)、施工、商務(wù)指標(biāo)三個(gè)方面,對(duì)設(shè)計(jì)施工總承包項(xiàng)目的評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)進(jìn)行了篩選和分解,最終構(gòu)建了包含33個(gè)二級(jí)指標(biāo)的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系。對(duì)于指標(biāo)中的定量和定性指標(biāo)采取了不同的量化方式,定性指標(biāo)采用模糊綜合評(píng)標(biāo)法(Fuzzy),有效地解決了評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)定量比較的問題；權(quán)重的確定采用的是層次分析法,通過調(diào)查問卷的方式,確定了各評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)的權(quán)重�？紤]到DB項(xiàng)目評(píng)標(biāo)的復(fù)雜性,本文初步建立了一個(gè)基于計(jì)算機(jī)技術(shù)的設(shè)計(jì)施工總承包評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)系統(tǒng)框架,以提高DB項(xiàng)目評(píng)標(biāo)的效率和有效性。最后本文結(jié)合設(shè)計(jì)施工總承包案例證實(shí)了評(píng)標(biāo)指標(biāo)體系和Fuzzy評(píng)價(jià)方法的實(shí)用性。
[Abstract]:Design and construction general contracting mode (DBD) has been proved to be a very effective engineering construction model in theory and practice, and has been widely used abroad. In our country, due to the current laws and regulations, Owners' concerns and the complexity of the DB project itself the general contracting market for DB is still at a primary and low level of development. However, the construction market continues to develop. The higher demand for renewal of modern engineering projects, the strong promotion of government departments and the consensus of the owners, are bound to become the trend of development and have broad market prospects. Practical experience shows that the proper selection of the most valuable DB contractor is the key to the success of the DB project. Objective and operable DB project bidding evaluation index system has become a key problem to be solved. This paper first analyzes the general contracting types in DB mode, and compares the advantages and disadvantages of each contracting type. This paper determines that the scope of bidding is the type of general contracting of DB from the beginning of preliminary design as the object of study. This paper briefly discusses several common bidding methods and bidding procedures of DB general contracting, and considers the characteristics of the proposed project. The number and capacity of the DB master contractor in the industry, the relationship between the owner and the DB master contractor, and the time spent by different bidding methods, By referring to the common bid evaluation procedures at home and abroad and combining the characteristics of DB general contracting, the bid evaluation procedure suitable for this model is put forward. It is concluded that the comprehensive bid evaluation method is more suitable for selecting the best DB general contractor. Then, on the basis of decision theory and system analysis conception, the paper constructs the evaluation index system of DB general contract bid by the thinking mode of system and multi-attribute decision theory. This paper adopts the method of case analysis and literature summary, respectively, from the design, In the three aspects of construction and commercial indexes, the evaluation indexes of general contracting projects for design and construction are screened and decomposed. Finally, the evaluation index system including 33 second-level indexes is constructed. The quantitative and qualitative indexes are different. The fuzzy comprehensive bid evaluation method is adopted to solve the problem of quantitative comparison of bid evaluation indexes. The weight is determined by Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The weight of each bid evaluation index is determined by questionnaire. Considering the complexity of DB project evaluation, In this paper, a framework of evaluation index system for general contract of design and construction based on computer technology is established. In order to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of DB project bid evaluation, this paper proves the practicability of the evaluation index system and Fuzzy evaluation method by combining the design and construction general contract cases.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：TU723.2

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 鄭增楓;張巍;;設(shè)計(jì)-建造承包模式在中國(guó)的推廣應(yīng)用[J];重慶大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2006年10期

2 劉長(zhǎng)江,吳喚群;D-B總承包模式的評(píng)標(biāo)管理研究[J];工程建設(shè)與設(shè)計(jì);2005年05期

3 潘彬;張得讓;;政府采購(gòu)招標(biāo)項(xiàng)目評(píng)標(biāo)方法——基于模糊數(shù)學(xué)綜合評(píng)判分析法[J];系統(tǒng)工程;2007年02期

4 劉晴;王建平;王叢瑩;;基于灰色關(guān)聯(lián)理論的建設(shè)工程評(píng)標(biāo)方法研究[J];工程管理學(xué)報(bào);2010年02期

5 管敏華;陸惠民;;國(guó)內(nèi)DB承包商的選擇模式研究[J];基建管理優(yōu)化;2008年03期

6 樊燕燕,劉振奎,趙延龍,馬維珍;模糊綜合評(píng)判法在建設(shè)工程評(píng)標(biāo)中的應(yīng)用[J];基建優(yōu)化;2003年04期

7 于海豐,成虎;工程總承包的發(fā)展過程和發(fā)展動(dòng)力[J];基建優(yōu)化;2005年02期

8 胡曉軍;黃志平;;設(shè)計(jì)施工總承包(DB)與傳統(tǒng)承包模式比較研究[J];技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理研究;2006年02期

9 羅甲生,李博,王孟鈞;設(shè)計(jì)施工聯(lián)合體模式的理論探討與實(shí)證分析[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2005年04期

10 夏波;陳炳泉;;我國(guó)“設(shè)計(jì)-施工”總承包市場(chǎng)回顧[J];建筑經(jīng)濟(jì);2009年S2期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前4條

1 楊曉輝;綠色理念下EPC項(xiàng)目總承包商選擇研究[D];哈爾濱工業(yè)大學(xué);2011年

2 白玉強(qiáng);PMC模式下EPC項(xiàng)目招投標(biāo)過程中評(píng)標(biāo)模型的建立與論證[D];對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)貿(mào)易大學(xué);2003年

3 趙啟;EPC項(xiàng)目選擇承包商研究[D];清華大學(xué);2005年

4 陳慶華;工程總承包模式中業(yè)主方管理研究[D];東南大學(xué);2005年

，

本文編號(hào)：1528569