極淺型潛流人工濕地改良風(fēng)沙土?xí)r水力負(fù)荷的優(yōu)化
[Abstract]:The key operating parameters of the extremely shallow subsurface flow constructed wetland in simultaneous treatment of municipal sewage and improved wind-sand soil, I. e., the hydraulic load of the wetland, were studied. The enrichment characteristics of nutrients in the wind-sand soil filled with the wetland were also discussed. The test system is located in a sewage treatment plant in Xi'an. The filling bed depth of very shallow subsurface flow constructed wetland is 0.1 m. The planting plants are tall fescue, ryegrass, dogtooth, Reed and cattail respectively. In the control group, the filling bed depth was 0.1 m, the filling was wind sand soil, the slow infiltration land treatment system without cultivated plants, and the planting plants of the 0.6 m wetland with 0.6 m bed depth in the two groups were dogtooth, tall fescue, ryegrass mixed species and Reed. A mixture of cattails. The influent of the test system is the effluent of the primary settling tank of the wastewater treatment plant. The main research contents are as follows: (1) optimization of hydraulic load in summer and winter of extremely shallow subsurface flow wetland; (2) variation characteristics of effluent water quality and organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus in aeolian sandy soil in long-term operation of each wetland; (3) migration and transformation of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in the system. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) in summer, the upper limit of optimal hydraulic load of extremely shallow subsurface flow wetland is 15 mm/d, and the lower limit of maintaining normal operating water level is 7.5 mm/d.. Winter, The upper limit to meet the discharge standard of wetland effluent was 7.5 mm/d (where COD and TN reached the second class). (2 discharge standard). The effluent COD,TN and TP concentrations of each wetland were significantly lower than that of raw water (P0. 0000. 01), and the average removal rates were above 74.39% and 64.78%, respectively. The effluent quality of 0.1 m land treatment system is poor. After 2 months of operation, the phenomenon of blockage occurs, and it is necessary to conduct manual dredging of 0.6 m wetland regularly after 8 months of operation, which results in the change of wetland operation mode from subsurface flow to surface flow. (3) Organic matter in the sandy soil of each wetland is changed from subsurface flow to surface flow. The contents of total nitrogen and total phosphorus were significantly different from those of the original soil (P0. 0000.01), which indicated that the organic matter, total nitrogen and total phosphorus of the wetland increased significantly, indicating that the wetland could rapidly enrich nutrients. It is beneficial to the rapid improvement of wind-sand soil. (4) 0.1 m wetland has good effect on COD,TN and TP treatment, stable operation for a long time, and high enrichment rate of nutrients in wind-sand soil. The effects of rapid improvement of wind-sand soil and purification of sewage can be achieved simultaneously. (5) using ryegrass and tall fescue as cultivation crops in wetland has strong adaptability, and still shows strong growth ability in winter. And it can form a dense root net on the surface of wind-sand soil, which is beneficial to the fixation of wind-sand soil. Therefore, it can be used as an excellent plant for improving wind-sand soil. (6) the carbon of extremely shallow subsurface flow wetland system, The material balance analysis of nitrogen and phosphorus shows that the degradation of microorganisms is the main way to remove carbon from wetland. Nitrification and denitrification of microorganisms were the main way of denitrification in wetland, followed by enrichment of fillers, and plant absorption accounted for only 2.05% 11.35%. The enrichment of fillers is the main way to remove phosphorus in constructed wetland system. In addition, plant absorption and microbial assimilation can also remove a small amount of phosphorus.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西安建筑科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2015
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】:S156
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條
1 尚建力;劉春紅;;沙漠中防風(fēng)固沙植物種群選擇的探討[J];安徽農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào)(上半月刊);2010年17期
2 湯顯強(qiáng);李金中;李學(xué)菊;劉學(xué)功;黃歲j;;7種水生植物對(duì)富營(yíng)養(yǎng)化水體中氮磷去除效果的比較研究[J];亞熱帶資源與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2007年02期
3 馬云艷;趙紅艷;嚴(yán)嘯;謝綠武;王開(kāi)莉;李鴻凱;;泥炭和腐泥改良風(fēng)沙土前后土壤理化性質(zhì)比較[J];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2009年06期
4 盧少勇;金相燦;余剛;;人工濕地的氮去除機(jī)理[J];生態(tài)學(xué)報(bào);2006年08期
5 梁繼東,周啟星,孫鐵珩;人工濕地污水處理系統(tǒng)研究及性能改進(jìn)分析[J];生態(tài)學(xué)雜志;2003年02期
6 周金娥;唐立峰;;人工濕地系統(tǒng)的除污機(jī)理及影響因素探討[J];土壤;2009年04期
7 吳獻(xiàn)花,侯長(zhǎng)定,王林,李蔭璽;人工濕地處理污水的機(jī)理[J];玉溪師范學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2002年01期
8 王超;任勇翔;張海;楊永哲;;水培技術(shù)作為人工濕地預(yù)處理工藝可行性研究[J];中國(guó)環(huán)境科學(xué);2010年08期
9 崔建垣,李玉霖,蘇永中;經(jīng)發(fā)酵的酒精廢渣用于沙地改良的試驗(yàn)研究[J];中國(guó)沙漠;2002年04期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條
1 王新偉;細(xì)沙作為極淺型潛流人工濕地填料的可行性研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2014年
,本文編號(hào):2230933
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/2230933.html