本文選題：土地整治新增耕地 + 耕地平臺(tái)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)��； 參考：《浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：目前在土地整治新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系研究中，未發(fā)現(xiàn)有學(xué)者開展耕地從無到有的平臺(tái)質(zhì)量形成和利用過程中的質(zhì)量提升兩個(gè)階段的耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)研究，這種現(xiàn)狀無法客觀反映土地整治的內(nèi)在要求和新增耕地客觀規(guī)律，這也是農(nóng)業(yè)部門和國土部門在新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)上產(chǎn)生分歧的原因之一。本研究在劃分耕地從無到有的平臺(tái)質(zhì)量形成和利用過程中的質(zhì)量提升兩個(gè)階段的基礎(chǔ)上，從耕地形成的平臺(tái)質(zhì)量角度，對(duì)土地整治新增耕地評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的優(yōu)化展開研究。這一成果，既可以完善當(dāng)前新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)方法的不足，充實(shí)耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)的內(nèi)容，也可以為國土部門開展土地整治新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)工作提供參考，具有一定的理論學(xué)術(shù)價(jià)值和實(shí)踐意義。 本研究采用專家咨詢法和實(shí)證分析法，利用會(huì)議和調(diào)研機(jī)會(huì)，選取涉及土壤、農(nóng)業(yè)、氣候、水利和遙感等領(lǐng)域的14位專家，進(jìn)行三輪次的咨詢調(diào)查結(jié)果與分析，每輪實(shí)發(fā)問卷14份，回收14份，問卷回收率為100%，采用SPSS17.0對(duì)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析處理。研究內(nèi)容主要包括以下四個(gè)方面：新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)的優(yōu)選；新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重的確定；新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)賦分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的制定；選取典型案例區(qū)對(duì)新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系的優(yōu)化方案進(jìn)行應(yīng)用驗(yàn)證。 主要研究結(jié)論如下：（1）耕地質(zhì)量建設(shè)應(yīng)分為平臺(tái)質(zhì)量建設(shè)和利用過程的質(zhì)量提升兩個(gè)階段，，新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)屬于耕地平臺(tái)質(zhì)量建設(shè)階段的內(nèi)容。（2）優(yōu)化后的指標(biāo)體系，選擇了田塊狀況、田間道路條件、坡度、灌排條件等因素，充分考慮了土地整治因素對(duì)新增耕地質(zhì)量的影響。（3）通過選取沿海灘涂圍墾新增耕地和山地低丘緩坡開發(fā)新增耕地兩種類型，用實(shí)證分析的方法，對(duì)優(yōu)化后的指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行研究應(yīng)用檢驗(yàn)。結(jié)果表明，沿海灘涂圍墾新增耕地在優(yōu)化后的指標(biāo)體系下評(píng)出的結(jié)果略高于在優(yōu)化前指標(biāo)體系下評(píng)出的結(jié)果，山地低丘緩坡開發(fā)新增耕地在優(yōu)化后的指標(biāo)體系下評(píng)出的結(jié)果略低于在優(yōu)化前指標(biāo)體系下評(píng)出的結(jié)果。優(yōu)化后的指標(biāo)體系充分考慮了土地整治及其新增耕地特點(diǎn)，對(duì)耕地質(zhì)量建設(shè)的集中連片和滿足現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)發(fā)展需要有積極的引領(lǐng)作用。 根據(jù)研究結(jié)論，提出以下建議：（1）耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)工作應(yīng)分階段分部門開展。建議國土相關(guān)部門主要對(duì)耕地平臺(tái)質(zhì)量進(jìn)行評(píng)價(jià)，農(nóng)業(yè)部門主要承擔(dān)耕地質(zhì)量提升階段的評(píng)價(jià)工作。（2）國土部門在平臺(tái)質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)中應(yīng)重點(diǎn)考慮田塊狀況、田間道路條件、坡度、灌排條件等指標(biāo)因素，評(píng)價(jià)成果主要為耕地占補(bǔ)平衡質(zhì)量管理工作服務(wù)；農(nóng)業(yè)部門應(yīng)重點(diǎn)考慮有機(jī)質(zhì)含量、pH值、氮磷鉀等指標(biāo)因素，評(píng)價(jià)成果主要為農(nóng)業(yè)生產(chǎn)管理服務(wù)。（3）不宜在地形破細(xì)碎化程度高、坡度大、交通不便的偏遠(yuǎn)地塊開發(fā)為新增耕地。(4)建議參考本研究成果，制定土地整治新增耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)體系，科學(xué)引導(dǎo)土地整治方向，形成土地整治新增耕地質(zhì)量提高的“倒逼機(jī)制”。
[Abstract]:At present, in the study of the evaluation index system of the new cultivated land quality in the land renovation, there are no scholars in the study of two stages of cultivated land quality evaluation in the process of quality formation and utilization of cultivated land, which can not objectively reflect the requirements of land renovation and the objective law of the new cultivated land. One of the reasons for the difference between the agricultural department and the land department in the evaluation of the quality of the new cultivated land is one of the reasons. On the basis of dividing the two stages of the quality formation and utilization of the platform quality, the evaluation index system of the new cultivated land is optimized from the angle of the platform quality formed by the cultivated land. This achievement can not only improve the shortage of the current evaluation methods of the quality of the new cultivated land, enrich the content of the quality evaluation of the cultivated land, but also provide a reference for the land department to carry out the evaluation work of the new cultivated land quality in the land renovation, which has a certain theoretical academic value and practical meaning.
Using the expert consultation method and the empirical analysis method, 14 experts in the field of soil, agriculture, climate, water conservancy and remote sensing were selected by the expert consultation method and the research opportunity, and the results and analysis of the three rounds of consultancy investigation were carried out. 14 copies of each round of questionnaires were collected and 14 were recovered. The recovery rate of the questionnaire was 100%, and the data were analyzed and processed with SPSS17.0. The main contents include the following four aspects: the optimization of the evaluation index of the quality of new cultivated land, the determination of the weight of the evaluation index of the quality of the new cultivated land, the formulation of the standard of adding the evaluation index of the quality evaluation of the new cultivated land, and the application of the typical case area to the optimization of the index system of the quality evaluation of the new cultivated land.
The main conclusions are as follows: (1) the quality construction of cultivated land should be divided into two stages of the quality construction of platform quality and the quality improvement of the utilization process. The quality evaluation of the new cultivated land belongs to the content of the quality construction stage of the cultivated land platform. (2) the index system after the optimization has been optimized, and the factors such as the situation of the fields, the conditions of the field, the slope and the conditions of irrigation and drainage are taken into full consideration. The influence of land renovation factors on the quality of new cultivated land. (3) through the selection of new cultivated land in coastal beach reclamation and the development of two new types of new cultivated land in mountain low hill gentle slope, the optimized index system is tested and applied by the method of empirical analysis. The results show that the new cultivated land in coastal beach reclamation is under the optimized index system. The result of the evaluation is slightly higher than that of the pre optimized index system. The result of the evaluation under the optimized index system is slightly lower than that under the optimized index system. The optimized index system fully considers the land renovation and the characteristics of the new cultivated land, and the quality construction of the cultivated land. It has a positive leading role in concentrating together and meeting the needs of modern agricultural development.
According to the conclusions of the research, the following suggestions are put forward: (1) the evaluation of cultivated land quality should be carried out in stages. It is suggested that the land related departments should mainly evaluate the quality of cultivated land platform, and the agricultural departments should mainly undertake the evaluation work of the stage of improving the quality of cultivated land. (2) the land department should focus on the situation of the fields in the evaluation of the platform quality and the field road. Road conditions, slope, irrigation and drainage conditions and other index factors, the evaluation results mainly for the quality management of cultivated land, the agricultural sector should focus on the organic content, pH value, nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium and other index factors, the evaluation results are mainly agricultural production management service. (3) it is not appropriate to break the terrain high degree, the slope is large, the traffic is inconvenient. The far massif is developed as the new cultivated land. (4) it is suggested that the index system of the evaluation of the new cultivated land quality in the land renovation should be drawn up, and the direction of land renovation should be guided scientifically to form a "forced mechanism" to improve the quality of the new cultivated land in the land renovation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：浙江財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F323.211

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 楊盡;孫傳敏;劉莉;劉顯凡;;川西地區(qū)土地整理新增耕地潛力的分析[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2008年07期

2 劉紅梅;王沛;王克強(qiáng);;農(nóng)村土地整治資金運(yùn)作管理問題研究[J];財(cái)政研究;2011年12期

3 劉瑤;金永平;周安國;;浙江省灘涂圍墾生態(tài)環(huán)境可持續(xù)性發(fā)展的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)及策略初探[J];海洋學(xué)研究;2006年S1期

4 徐紹史;;深入開展農(nóng)村土地整治 搭建新農(nóng)村建設(shè)和城鄉(xiāng)統(tǒng)籌發(fā)展新平臺(tái)[J];國土資源通訊;2009年08期

5 牛海鵬;李明秋;;河南省整治后耕地質(zhì)量影響因素分析及其評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系構(gòu)建[J];河南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2008年06期

6 鮑海君;徐保根;;生態(tài)導(dǎo)向的土地整治區(qū)空間優(yōu)化與規(guī)劃設(shè)計(jì)模式——以嘉興市七星鎮(zhèn)為例[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)地理;2009年11期

7 杜靜;王璦玲;馬云波;;土地整理效益模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)比較研究——以寧陽縣兩個(gè)土地整理項(xiàng)目為例[J];江西農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2008年03期

8 楊明龍;潘萍;;層次分析法在耕地質(zhì)量評(píng)價(jià)中的應(yīng)用[J];昆明冶金高等專科學(xué)校學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

9 王春枝;斯琴;;德爾菲法中的數(shù)據(jù)統(tǒng)計(jì)處理方法及其應(yīng)用研究[J];內(nèi)蒙古財(cái)經(jīng)學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào)(綜合版);2011年04期

10 張正峰,陳百明;土地整理的效益分析[J];農(nóng)業(yè)工程學(xué)報(bào);2003年02期

本文編號(hào)：1921880