本文選題：耕地非農(nóng)化 + 風險��； 參考：《東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：合理分配耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益對維護社會公平正義及基層政治穩(wěn)定具有重要意義。隨著城市化進程的加快,耕地轉(zhuǎn)為城市建設(shè)用地的速度也在增加,由增值收益分配不公引發(fā)的社會問題日益突顯,如何通過改革現(xiàn)有利益分配機制,讓失地農(nóng)民分享城市化成果,平衡耕地非農(nóng)化更權(quán)利主體收益,儼然成為當前理論和實踐中需要迫切研究和解決的問題。通過此次研究,將各權(quán)利主體在耕地非農(nóng)化中所作貢獻及所擔風險納入耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益分配中,明確各權(quán)利主體在耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益的分配關(guān)系和分配比例,為實現(xiàn)土地收益分配中的公平效率提供科學的依據(jù)和相關(guān)的實踐指導。本文從保護失地農(nóng)民利益的角度出發(fā),引入“聯(lián)盟利益分配機制”,提出假設(shè),考慮各權(quán)利主體投資及所擔風險情況,應(yīng)用模糊綜合評價法,定量地確定各權(quán)利主體之間耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益分配比例,系統(tǒng)探索了耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益分配的新思路。研究結(jié)果表明:耕地資源價值除經(jīng)濟價值外,還具有社會價值和生態(tài)價值,客觀合理的測算耕地資源綜合價值是準確量化并分配耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益的前提;在耕地非農(nóng)化中,假設(shè)各權(quán)利主體參與征地行為是一種投資行為,各權(quán)利主體所擔風險從高到低依次為農(nóng)民、中央政府、地方政府、村集體,其投資額從高到低依次為農(nóng)民、中央政府、地方政府、村集體,各權(quán)利主體耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益分配額及比例為中央政府317.93元/m2,占26%,地方政府269.01元/m2,占22%,村集體207.87元/m2,占17%,農(nóng)民427.98元/m2,占35%;運用“聯(lián)盟利益分配機制”測算耕地非農(nóng)化各權(quán)利主體之間的增值收益分配比例是可行的。以縮小征地范圍,尊重農(nóng)民意愿為條件制定征地補償標準不僅體現(xiàn)補償公平原則,也符合通過市場機制對農(nóng)民進行補償?shù)母母锓较�。針對這一分配格局,本文提出構(gòu)建耕地非農(nóng)化增值收益分配機制的設(shè)計方案應(yīng)從明確公共利益范圍;按耕地資源實際價值確定增值收益;將風險因素納入分配體系;實行公正、高效的征地程序等方面入手,并對方案實施相關(guān)的配套措施提出了建設(shè)性意見。
[Abstract]:Rational distribution of non-agricultural value-added income of cultivated land is of great significance to maintain social fairness and justice and political stability at the grass-roots level. With the acceleration of urbanization, the rate of conversion of cultivated land to urban construction land is also increasing. The social problems caused by unfair distribution of value-added income are increasingly prominent. How to reform the existing benefit distribution mechanism, It is an urgent problem to share the achievements of urbanization and to balance the income of non-farm land as the main body of right in the current theory and practice. Through this study, the contribution and risk of the rights subject in the non-agricultural cultivated land are included in the distribution of the value-added income of the non-agricultural cultivated land, and the distribution relationship and the distribution ratio of the value-added benefits of the various rights subjects in the non-agricultural cultivated land are clarified. It provides scientific basis and practical guidance for the realization of fair and efficient land income distribution. From the point of view of protecting the interests of landless farmers, this paper introduces the "mechanism of distribution of alliance interests", puts forward the hypothesis, considers the investment and risks of each right subject, and applies the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. In order to determine quantitatively the distribution ratio of non-agricultural value-added income of cultivated land among different rights subjects, a new way of thinking about the distribution of cultivated land non-agricultural value-added income is systematically explored. The results show that the value of cultivated land resources has social value and ecological value in addition to economic value. The objective and reasonable calculation of the comprehensive value of cultivated land resources is the premise of accurately quantifying and distributing the added value of non-agricultural cultivated land. Suppose that the participation of all rights subjects in land expropriation is an investment behavior, and the risks borne by the rights subjects from high to low are farmers, central government, local governments, village collectives, and their investment amount from high to low is the farmers, the central government, in turn. Local governments, village collectives, The distribution amount and proportion of non-agricultural value-added income of cultivated land in all right subjects is 317.93 yuan / m2 of central government, accounting for 26%, local government 269.01 yuan / m2, accounting for 22%, village collective 207.87 yuan / m2, accounting for 17%, peasants 427.98 yuan / m2, accounting for 35%; using "alliance benefit distribution mechanism" to calculate cultivated land It is feasible to distribute the value-added income among the right subjects of non-agriculture. Under the condition of reducing the scope of land requisition and respecting the will of farmers, the compensation standard of land requisition not only embodies the principle of compensation fairness, but also accords with the reform direction of compensation to farmers through market mechanism. In view of this distribution pattern, this paper puts forward the design scheme of constructing the distribution mechanism of cultivated land non-agricultural value-added income, which should include the scope of public interest, determine the value-added income according to the actual value of cultivated land resources, bring risk factors into the distribution system, and implement justice. Effective land requisition procedures and other aspects, and the implementation of the program related to the relevant measures put forward constructive suggestions.
【學位授予單位】：東北農(nóng)業(yè)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F323.211

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 丁寧;金曉斌;李珍貴;唐健;胡靜;周寅康;;征地社會穩(wěn)定風險評估規(guī)范化研究[J];中國土地科學;2013年01期

2 諸培新;唐鵬;;農(nóng)地征收與供應(yīng)中的土地增值收益分配機制創(chuàng)新——基于江蘇省的實證分析[J];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學學報(社會科學版);2013年01期

3 朱一中;曹裕;;農(nóng)地非農(nóng)化過程中的土地增值收益分配研究——基于土地發(fā)展權(quán)的視角[J];經(jīng)濟地理;2012年10期

4 劉江濤;張波;;城市邊緣區(qū)土地增值收益分配管理研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟問題探索;2012年08期

5 劉禹麒;;“漲價歸公”思想溯源及評析[J];廣東土地科學;2012年03期

6 苑韶峰;劉欣玫;楊麗霞;孫樂;;農(nóng)地轉(zhuǎn)用過程中土地增值收益分配研究綜述[J];上海國土資源;2012年01期

7 王瑞慶;;漲價歸公與南京國民政府時期土地征收地價補償研究[J];中國社會經(jīng)濟史研究;2012年01期

8 張志;劉耀林;龔健;;耕地轉(zhuǎn)為建設(shè)用地價格評估——以河南省南陽市為例[J];自然資源學報;2009年12期

9 李景剛;歐名豪;張效軍;臧俊梅;高艷梅;張全景;;耕地資源價值重建及其貨幣化評價——以青島市為例[J];自然資源學報;2009年11期

10 岳桂寧;滕莉莉;王春花;;我國地方政府“土地財政”問題研究[J];開放導報;2009年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 周誠;;農(nóng)地征用中的公正補償[N];中國經(jīng)濟時報;2003年

相關(guān)博士學位論文 前2條

1 張效軍;耕地保護區(qū)域補償機制研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學;2006年

2 張宏斌;土地非農(nóng)化機制研究[D];浙江大學;2001年

，

本文編號：1820347