本文選題：土壤氮磷 + 淋溶��； 參考：《西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：氮磷流失是造成農(nóng)業(yè)面源污染的主要原因,其中淋溶流失已成為不可忽視源,因此對(duì)氮磷在土壤中的淋溶流失研究具有重要意義。本文選取陜西省周至縣竹峪鄉(xiāng)俞家河農(nóng)田土壤,采用室內(nèi)模擬裝置淋溶土柱的方法,探究了四種外源添加物質(zhì)(土壤調(diào)理劑、砒砂巖、秸稈、生物炭)對(duì)土壤氮磷素淋溶特征的影響。并定期在流經(jīng)該地區(qū)的俞家河設(shè)置10個(gè)不同斷面取水樣,測(cè)定總磷(TP)、總氮(TN)、總?cè)芙庑粤?TDP)、溶解性反應(yīng)磷(DRP)、顆粒磷(PP)和溶解性有機(jī)磷(DOP),分析河水氮磷濃度變化及影響因素。論文主要得出以下結(jié)論:(1)生物炭可以增加淋溶液中PP、DPR和DOP的濃度,進(jìn)而增加TP的濃度(變化范圍0.68~2.86 mg/l)。隨著生物炭(2%、4%、8%)施入比例的增大,淋溶液各形態(tài)磷和土壤中速效磷(Olsen-P)、可溶性磷(CaCl2-P)含量顯著性增大,其中Olsen-P含量分別增加了141%、290%、382%,生物炭顯著地提高了土壤中磷素的淋溶能力;秸稈增加淋溶液中DOP和PP濃度,進(jìn)而增加TP的含量,同時(shí)DRP含量降低了50%,在TP中所占的比例僅為4.7%。秸稈減少淋溶液和土壤中有效磷含量,并阻止土壤中CaCl2-P向下層移動(dòng),減少磷素對(duì)環(huán)境的風(fēng)險(xiǎn);(2)4%、8%的生物炭施用量降低了土壤氮素淋失分別為30%和20.7%,2%的生物炭施用量卻增加了土壤氮素淋失量為5.9%,同時(shí)生物炭(2%、4%、8%)降低土壤中堿解氮含量,對(duì)氮素起到抑制作用。秸稈的施入降低土壤氮素淋失為9.7%,并使堿解氮含量增加59.1%,土壤中總氮和堿解氮含量主要集中在0-10 cm,秸稈顯著地降低抑制氮素淋溶,并提高表層土壤肥力。砒砂巖對(duì)土壤中氮素的淋失起到抑制作用,短時(shí)間內(nèi)減少了土壤中堿解氮含量。(3)俞家河河水TP、PP、TDP、TN濃度的變化具有季節(jié)性,4~9月作物生長(zhǎng)期河水TP濃度都高于藻類(lèi)發(fā)生的臨界值(0.02 mg/l)。PP占TP的67.7%,是河水磷素主要形態(tài),DRP和DOP含量較低,取決于河水本身,其中DOP濃度在7、8月較高,與河水溫度有關(guān)。河水TN濃度的變化范圍為1.6~14.0 mg/l,各月份其平均值為5.8 mg/l,均超過(guò)臨界值(2 mg/l)。過(guò)量的施肥是河水中氮磷含量的主要來(lái)源,降雨和施肥是導(dǎo)致河水面源污染的主要原因。俞家河河水氮素污染更為嚴(yán)重,生物炭能降低氮素淋失,但確定其施入量時(shí)應(yīng)綜合考慮對(duì)磷素的促進(jìn)作用。秸稈抑制氮素淋失的同時(shí)能降低磷素對(duì)環(huán)境的風(fēng)險(xiǎn)。砒砂巖和土壤調(diào)理劑對(duì)環(huán)境的作用不顯著。
[Abstract]:Nitrogen and phosphorus loss is the main cause of agricultural non-point source pollution, among which leaching loss has become a source that can not be ignored, so the study of nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in soil is of great significance. In this paper, the soil of Yujiahe farmland in Zhuyuxiang, Zhouzhi County, Shaanxi Province was selected, and four kinds of exogenous substances (soil conditioning agent, arsenopyst, straw) were studied by means of indoor simulation device leaching soil column. Effects of biochar) on the leaching characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus in soil. Ten water samples from different sections of Yujiahe River flowing through the area were set up on a regular basis to determine total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TNN), total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), dissolved reactive phosphorus (DRP), particulate phosphorus (PPN) and dissolved organic phosphorus (DPP). The changes of nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations in river water and their influencing factors were analyzed. The main conclusions are as follows: (1) Biochar can increase the concentration of PPP-DPR and DOP in leaching solution, and then increase the concentration of TP (range 0.68 ~ 2.86 mg / L ~ (-1)). With the increase of the application rate of biochar, the contents of various forms of phosphorus in leaching solution and Olsen-Pn in soil, soluble phosphorus CaCl2-P) increased significantly, and the content of Olsen-P increased by 141 ~ 290 ~ (382), respectively. Biochar significantly improved the leaching ability of phosphorus in soil. Straw increased the concentration of DOP and PP in leaching solution, and then increased the content of TP. Meanwhile, the content of DRP decreased by 50%, and the proportion in TP was only 4.7%. Straw reduced the content of available phosphorus in leaching solution and soil, and prevented CaCl2-P from moving down in soil. To reduce the risk of phosphorus to the environment, to reduce the amount of biochar applied by 8%, to reduce the nitrogen leaching loss of soil by 30% and 20.7%, respectively, but to increase the amount of soil nitrogen leaching by 5.9g, and to decrease the content of alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen in the soil by the addition of biochar. It has an inhibitory effect on nitrogen. The application of straw reduced the leaching loss of nitrogen to 9.7%, and increased the content of alkaline hydrolyzed nitrogen by 59.1%. The content of total nitrogen and alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen in the soil was mainly 0-10 cm. The straw significantly decreased the inhibition of nitrogen leaching and improved the fertility of surface soil. Arsenic sandstone can inhibit the leaching of nitrogen in soil. In a short period of time, the content of alkali-hydrolyzed nitrogen in soil was reduced.) the change of TP concentration in the river water of Yujiahe River shows that the TP concentration in the river water during the growing period from April to September is higher than 67.7% of the critical value of algae, which is the main form of phosphorus in river water. The contents of DRP and DOP were low, Depending on the river itself, DOP concentrations are higher in July and August, depending on the river's temperature. The variation range of TN concentration in river water is 1.6 ~ 14.0 mg / l, and its average value is 5.8 mg / L in each month, which is above the critical value of 2 mg / L ~ (-1). Excessive fertilization is the main source of nitrogen and phosphorus content in river water, and rainfall and fertilization are the main causes of water non-point source pollution. The nitrogen pollution in Yujiahe River is more serious, and biochar can reduce the nitrogen leaching loss, but the promotion of phosphorus should be considered comprehensively when determining the amount of nitrogen applied in Yujiahe River. Straw can reduce the environmental risk of phosphorus while inhibiting nitrogen leaching. The effect of soft rock and soil conditioner on environment is not significant.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：S158

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 朱堅(jiān);紀(jì)雄輝;田發(fā)祥;吳家梅;劉昭兵;彭華;張振興;;秸稈還田對(duì)雙季稻產(chǎn)量及氮磷徑流損失的影響[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)研究;2016年11期

2 宋賢威;趙秀蘭;張進(jìn)忠;胡夢(mèng)坤;徐艷昭;王明禹;;蒙脫石對(duì)有機(jī)物料施入土壤磷形態(tài)和有效性的影響[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2016年10期

3 李聰聰;;我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)面源污染治理技術(shù)研究進(jìn)展[J];農(nóng)業(yè)與技術(shù);2016年12期

4 馬瑛;;農(nóng)業(yè)面源污染治理現(xiàn)狀分析[J];現(xiàn)代農(nóng)業(yè)科技;2016年09期

5 陳方鑫;盧少勇;馮傳平;;農(nóng)業(yè)秸稈復(fù)合PAM對(duì)湖濱帶土壤改良效果的研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)環(huán)境科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2016年04期

6 閔繼勝;孔祥智;;我國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)面源污染問(wèn)題的研究進(jìn)展[J];華中農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年02期

7 李卓瑞;韋高玲;;不同生物炭添加量對(duì)土壤中氮磷淋溶損失的影響[J];生態(tài)環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2016年02期

8 趙鳳亮;鄒雨坤;朱治強(qiáng);李虹;李勤奮;;施用椰殼生物炭對(duì)磚紅壤氮素淋失和油麥菜吸收利用的影響[J];華北農(nóng)學(xué)報(bào);2015年S1期

9 樊慧慧;李如忠;裴婷婷;張瑞鋼;;合肥城郊典型農(nóng)業(yè)小流域土壤磷形態(tài)及淋失風(fēng)險(xiǎn)分析[J];環(huán)境科學(xué);2016年01期

10 龔蓉;劉強(qiáng);榮湘民;張玉平;;中南丘陵旱地磷肥減量對(duì)不同形態(tài)磷素養(yǎng)分淋失的影響[J];水土保持學(xué)報(bào);2015年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 陸文龍;秸稈改良農(nóng)田土壤中氮磷形態(tài)分布及玉米生長(zhǎng)發(fā)育特征[D];吉林大學(xué);2016年

2 馬文梅;砒砂巖風(fēng)化物改良土壤水分入滲過(guò)程及黑麥草效應(yīng)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2016年

3 攝曉燕;砒砂巖風(fēng)化物改良風(fēng)沙土的水肥過(guò)程及其生物響應(yīng)[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2016年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 陳曦;模擬降雨條件下秦嶺北麓土壤養(yǎng)分流失特征研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2016年

2 韋安勝;秦嶺北麓面源污染風(fēng)險(xiǎn)評(píng)價(jià)[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2015年

3 田路園;秸稈還田對(duì)土壤氮素流失的影響[D];海南大學(xué);2015年

4 高德才;生物黑炭與有機(jī)無(wú)機(jī)肥配施對(duì)旱地作物生長(zhǎng)及養(yǎng)分淋失的影響[D];湖南農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

5 張瑞龍;秦嶺北麓余家河流域土壤磷素流失風(fēng)險(xiǎn)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

6 溫婧;砒砂巖修復(fù)重金屬污染土壤的研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2014年

7 程燕;秸稈還田及化肥配施對(duì)土壤性狀及氮磷流失的影響[D];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

8 張成紅;生物炭對(duì)土壤養(yǎng)分狀況的影響[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

9 許曉光;亞熱帶地區(qū)四種典型土地利用模式下的氮磷淋失特征研究[D];西安建筑科技大學(xué);2013年

10 趙桂英;太湖水華藍(lán)藻優(yōu)勢(shì)維持機(jī)制的初步研究[D];南京大學(xué);2012年

，

本文編號(hào)：1817338