華北土石山區(qū)典型小流域土壤水文特征研究
本文選題:土石山區(qū) + 土壤物理性質(zhì) ; 參考:《西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文
【摘要】:研究土石山區(qū)土壤水文特征是開展山坡水循環(huán)機(jī)理研究和進(jìn)行山區(qū)產(chǎn)匯流分析的前提和基礎(chǔ),不僅可以為山坡水文學(xué)的發(fā)展奠定理論基礎(chǔ),而且對山區(qū)區(qū)域環(huán)境治理具有重要的理論和現(xiàn)實(shí)意義,同時(shí)可以為太行山區(qū)水資源合理開發(fā)利用提供科學(xué)依據(jù)。本研究以崇陵流域作為研究區(qū),通過野外試驗(yàn)和室內(nèi)試驗(yàn)相結(jié)合的方法,開展相關(guān)研究工作。詳細(xì)分析了研究區(qū)土壤物理性質(zhì)和水動(dòng)力學(xué)參數(shù)在植被、坡度條件下的變化規(guī)律及空間分布規(guī)律,土壤厚度和巖石風(fēng)化層厚度統(tǒng)計(jì)特性、相關(guān)性和變異性、空間分布規(guī)律,土壤含水量影響因素及其與土壤含水量的響應(yīng)關(guān)系。主要研究成果如下:(1)荊條、油松條件下土壤顆粒大小分布曲線相似;側(cè)柏、刺槐條件下土壤顆粒大小分布曲線相似;土壤容重、毛管孔隙度、隨著深度增加逐漸增大,而總孔隙度、非毛管孔隙度及滲透系數(shù)逐漸減小;隨著坡度增大,容重、毛管孔隙度逐漸增大,而總孔隙度和非毛管孔隙度逐漸減小;空間分布上,容重、非毛管孔隙度及滲透系數(shù)在中部花崗片麻巖地區(qū)最大,其他地區(qū)小,而毛管孔隙度和田間持水量在石灰?guī)r地區(qū)大,其他地區(qū)相對較小;(2)基于地統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)研究方法,分析了流域土壤厚度及巖石風(fēng)化層厚度影響因素、統(tǒng)計(jì)特征、變化趨勢、空間相關(guān)與變異性及空間分布規(guī)律;土壤厚度數(shù)據(jù)樣本和巖石風(fēng)化層厚度數(shù)據(jù)樣本具有中等變異特性;土壤厚度和巖石風(fēng)化層厚度最優(yōu)半變異函數(shù)模型均為指數(shù)函數(shù)模型;在東西方向上,土壤厚度擬合曲線為倒U型,巖石風(fēng)化層厚度擬合曲線為指數(shù)型,在南北方向上,土壤厚度擬合曲線為冪函數(shù)型,而巖石風(fēng)化層厚度擬合曲線為倒U型;土壤厚度具有強(qiáng)空間相關(guān)性,而巖石風(fēng)化層厚度具有中等強(qiáng)度相關(guān)性;在空間分布上,土壤厚度從西北部向東南部逐漸增大,而巖石風(fēng)化層厚度則相反;(3)松林小區(qū)土壤含水量隨著深度增加逐漸增大,荒坡小區(qū)土壤含水量隨著深度增加先減小后增大,土壤含水量與降水量呈正相關(guān)關(guān)系,隨著降水量增加土壤含水量逐漸增大;土壤含水量低于凋萎系數(shù)時(shí),氣溫對土壤含水量影響較小,土壤含水量高于凋萎系數(shù)時(shí),隨著氣溫升高土壤含水量逐漸增大,氣溫對土壤含水量的影響強(qiáng)于降水。
[Abstract]:The study of soil hydrological characteristics in earth-rock mountain areas is the premise and foundation for the study of the mechanism of hillside water cycle and the analysis of runoff yield and confluence in mountainous areas, which can not only lay a theoretical foundation for the development of hillside hydrology.Moreover, it has important theoretical and practical significance for regional environmental management in mountainous areas, and can provide scientific basis for the rational development and utilization of water resources in Taihang Mountain area.In this study, Chongling Watershed was taken as the research area, and related research work was carried out through the combination of field test and laboratory test.The variation and spatial distribution of soil physical properties and hydrodynamic parameters under vegetation and slope conditions, the statistical characteristics of soil thickness and rock weathering layer thickness, the correlation and variability, and the spatial distribution law of soil physical properties and hydrodynamic parameters in the study area were analyzed in detail.Influencing factors of soil moisture content and its response to soil moisture content.The main research results are as follows: the distribution curve of soil particle size under Pinus tabulaeformis is similar; that of Platycladus orientalis and Robinia pseudoacacia is similar; the soil bulk density and capillary porosity increase with the increase of depth.However, the total porosity, non-capillary porosity and permeability coefficient gradually decreased; with the slope increasing, the bulk density gradually increased, while the total porosity and non-capillary porosity gradually decreased.The non-capillary porosity and permeability coefficient were the largest in the central granitic gneiss area and small in other areas, while the capillary porosity and field water holding capacity were large in the limestone area and relatively small in other areas.The influencing factors of soil thickness and rock weathering layer thickness, statistical characteristics, variation trend, spatial correlation and variability and spatial distribution law are analyzed, and the soil thickness data sample and rock weathering layer thickness data sample have medium variation characteristics.The optimum semi-variogram model of soil thickness and rock weathering layer thickness is exponential function model, in east-west direction, the fitting curve of soil thickness is inverted U type, the fitting curve of rock weathering layer thickness is exponential type, and in the north and south direction, the fitting curve of soil thickness is inverted U type.The fitting curve of soil thickness is power function type, while the fitting curve of rock weathering layer thickness is inverted U type, the soil thickness has strong spatial correlation, while the thickness of rock weathering layer has moderate intensity correlation.The thickness of soil increased gradually from northwest to southeast, but the thickness of rock weathering layer increased with the increase of depth, and the soil water content of barren slope decreased first and then increased with the increase of depth.There was a positive correlation between soil water content and precipitation. When soil moisture content was lower than wilting coefficient, temperature had little effect on soil water content, and soil water content was higher than wilting coefficient.The effect of air temperature on soil water content is stronger than that of precipitation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】:西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】:碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】:2017
【分類號】:S714
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 梁佳輝;張少良;穆林林;黃靜;楊方益;董峰;張新波;蒙亮;沈慶松;王曜;;東北典型黑土區(qū)坡面土壤速效磷空間分布規(guī)律[J];水土保持研究;2017年01期
2 錢登峰;張志偉;張博;;不同林齡云杉林土壤持水性及影響因子分析[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2017年02期
3 李力;張祥星;郭建青;鄭睿;聶繼生;;阜康農(nóng)田與荒漠土壤含水量時(shí)空變化的對比分析[J];人民珠江;2016年07期
4 李海防;趙明秀;樊亞明;趙連生;王邵能;趙苡;;漓江上游貓兒山3種典型植被不同層次土壤的含水量[J];水土保持通報(bào);2016年03期
5 彭揚(yáng)建;甘磊;馬蕊;張靜舉;陶煥壯;張中彬;;廣西桂林不同植被覆蓋下土壤含水量空間變異性研究[J];福建農(nóng)業(yè)學(xué)報(bào);2016年05期
6 陳翠琴;;林地土壤持水性研究[J];農(nóng)業(yè)災(zāi)害研究;2015年06期
7 張志敏;李春芳;鞏駿驥;吳泉源;;黃三角經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)旱季土壤含水量時(shí)空特征研究[J];安徽農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2014年32期
8 趙琛;張?zhí)m慧;李金麟;田杰;吳維臻;金鑫;張喜風(fēng);蔣憶文;王曉磊;賀纏生;白曉;;黑河上游土壤含水量的空間分布與環(huán)境因子的關(guān)系[J];蘭州大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2014年03期
9 張寶峰;曾路生;李俊良;陳清;;優(yōu)化施肥處理下設(shè)施菜地土壤容重與孔隙度的變化[J];中國農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2013年32期
10 李曉晶;李德生;高為霞;劉路陽;李榮花;蒲括;魯?shù)つ?吳強(qiáng);;不同植被類型對沙區(qū)土壤持水性的影響[J];環(huán)境科學(xué)與技術(shù);2013年10期
相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前9條
1 張小筱;涇陽南塬黃土邊坡飽和滲透系數(shù)特性研究[D];長安大學(xué);2016年
2 劉蒙蒙;涇陽縣南塬黃土邊坡滲透系數(shù)變異性分析[D];長安大學(xué);2015年
3 韋佳;欒城農(nóng)田土壤含水量時(shí)空變化分析[D];長安大學(xué);2014年
4 尹亮;西南巖溶高原石漠化地區(qū)小流域土壤厚度空間分異規(guī)律研究[D];湖南大學(xué);2012年
5 李成有;不同耕作措施下土壤持水性及其影響因素[D];甘肅農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2009年
6 張揚(yáng);寧南黃土丘陵區(qū)植被恢復(fù)方式的土壤水庫特征研究[D];中國科學(xué)院研究生院(教育部水土保持與生態(tài)環(huán)境研究中心);2009年
7 徐敬華;黃土丘陵區(qū)人工植被恢復(fù)對土壤水力性質(zhì)的影響[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2008年
8 嵇慶才;江蘇地區(qū)土壤持水性及水分有效性研究[D];揚(yáng)州大學(xué);2006年
9 劉紀(jì)根;坡耕地施加PAM降雨入滲產(chǎn)流及侵蝕產(chǎn)沙規(guī)律試驗(yàn)研究[D];西北農(nóng)林科技大學(xué);2002年
,本文編號:1771989
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/nykj/1771989.html