本文關(guān)鍵詞： 灌溉 設(shè)施土壤 土壤腐殖質(zhì) 胡敏酸 富里酸 胡敏素　出處：《沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：本文自連續(xù)13年以同一灌溉方案進(jìn)行番茄栽培的塑料大棚內(nèi)分層采集0～80cm 土層土壤樣本,測定溝灌、滴灌和滲灌3種灌溉處理的設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)組分及結(jié)合態(tài)含量,通過比較其異同,探討灌溉方式對設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)含量及品質(zhì)的影響機(jī)理,以期為設(shè)施蔬菜栽培條件下執(zhí)行合理水分管理措施提供理論依據(jù)。該長期定位試驗(yàn)于沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)科研基地內(nèi)進(jìn)行,共設(shè)溝灌、滴灌和滲灌3種灌溉處理,各處理灌水控制上、下限相同,為6kPa和40kPa,計(jì)劃濕潤比不同,分別為1.0、0.5和0.5;溝灌和滴灌的灌水方法同當(dāng)?shù)?滲灌使用發(fā)汗式多孔塑膠管灌水、灌水管埋深30cm。土壤腐殖質(zhì)組分及結(jié)合態(tài)分離測定使用了常規(guī)方法。得到的主要研究結(jié)果如下。第一,各灌溉處理土壤總有機(jī)碳、腐殖質(zhì)含量在0～50cm 土層均隨深度增加而直線減少,在50～80 cm 土層含量較低、變異較小,說明灌溉等水分管理措施對設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)的影響主要集中在0～50cm 土層內(nèi)。第二,同一土層不同灌溉處理間腐殖質(zhì)各組分含量差異明顯。胡敏酸、富里酸和胡敏素等含量在0～20 cm 土層均表現(xiàn)為滴灌溝灌滲灌,20～80cm 土層均表現(xiàn)為滲灌滴灌溝灌;滴灌處理與滲灌相比表層土壤胡敏酸、富里酸和胡敏素等含量高、隨土層深度增加下降速度快,溝灌處理剖面分布特點(diǎn)與滴灌相似、但含量總體上低于滴灌和滲灌。第三,依胡富比和色調(diào)系數(shù)(△logK)判斷,隨土層加深各灌溉處理腐殖質(zhì)分子結(jié)構(gòu)越復(fù)雜,分子量越大;0～80cm 土層,與滴灌和滲灌處理相比,溝灌處理的腐殖質(zhì)分子結(jié)構(gòu)更復(fù)雜、分子量更大。第四,腐殖質(zhì)各組分及結(jié)合態(tài)含量與總有機(jī)碳、全氮、全磷等主要肥力指標(biāo)含量間均具有顯著或極顯著的相關(guān)關(guān)系,說明設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)含量及分子結(jié)構(gòu)復(fù)雜度對土壤肥力具有重要影響。綜合評價(jià)灌溉方式對設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)的影響,滴灌效果優(yōu)于溝灌和滲灌;設(shè)施蔬菜栽培時(shí),長時(shí)間應(yīng)用滴灌進(jìn)行灌溉,耕層(0～20cm)土壤總有機(jī)碳含量能夠維持在一較高水平,且腐殖質(zhì)各組分及松結(jié)態(tài)、緊結(jié)態(tài)含量高于溝灌和滲灌處理,這對于設(shè)施蔬菜栽培的養(yǎng)分供應(yīng)和土壤質(zhì)量提升都是有利的。
[Abstract]:In this paper, soil samples of 0 ~ 80cm soil layer were collected from plastic greenhouse of tomato cultivation in the same irrigation scheme for 13 consecutive years, and the humus composition and bound state content of protected soil under furrow irrigation, drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation were measured. By comparing their similarities and differences, the effects of irrigation methods on the content and quality of humus in protected soil were discussed. The experiment was carried out in the scientific research base of Shenyang Agricultural University. There were three irrigation treatments: gully irrigation, drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the irrigation control of each treatment was carried out. The lower limit is the same, 6 KPA and 40 KPA, and the planned wetting ratio is different, 1.0 and 0.5, respectively. The irrigation methods of furrow irrigation and drip irrigation are the same as the local ones. The soil humus composition and the combined state separation were determined by conventional methods. The main results were as follows. Firstly, the soil total organic carbon and humus content of each irrigation treatment decreased linearly with the increase of soil depth. The results showed that the effect of irrigation and other water management measures on soil humus was mainly concentrated in 0 ~ 50 cm soil layer. The humus content of different irrigation treatments in the same soil layer was obviously different. The contents of Hu Min acid, fulvic acid and humin in 0 ~ 20 cm soil layer were all shown as drip irrigation furrow irrigation 20 ~ 80 cm soil layer and drip irrigation drip irrigation furrow irrigation. The content of Hu Min, fulvic acid and humin in surface soil of drip irrigation treatment was higher than that of infiltration irrigation, and decreased rapidly with the increase of soil depth. The profile distribution of furrow irrigation treatment was similar to that of drip irrigation, but the content was lower than that of drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation. According to Hu Fu ratio and hue coefficient (logK), the molecular structure of humus in furrow irrigation treatment was more complex than that in drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment, and the molecular structure of humus in each irrigation treatment was more complex, and the molecular weight of humus was higher than that of drip irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment. The molecular weight is higher than 4th. There is a significant or extremely significant correlation between the contents of humus components and their binding states and the contents of total organic carbon, total nitrogen, total phosphorus and other main fertility indexes, such as total organic carbon (TOC), total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP) and so on. The results showed that the content of humus and the complexity of molecular structure had important influence on soil fertility, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation, and the effect of drip irrigation was better than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation. The soil total organic carbon content can be maintained at a higher level, and humus components and loose state, tight state content is higher than furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment, the soil total organic carbon content can be maintained at a relatively high level by drip irrigation for a long period of time, and the tight state content is higher than that of furrow irrigation and infiltration irrigation treatment. This is beneficial to nutrient supply and soil quality improvement of vegetable cultivation.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：S153.622;S275

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 吳景貴,席時(shí)權(quán),姜巖;土壤腐殖質(zhì)的分析化學(xué)研究進(jìn)展[J];分析化學(xué);1997年10期

2 閆娥,孫文鳳;土壤腐殖質(zhì)的分析化學(xué)研究現(xiàn)狀[J];青海大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2000年05期

3 梁重山,劉叢強(qiáng),黨志;現(xiàn)代分析技術(shù)在土壤腐殖質(zhì)研究中的應(yīng)用[J];土壤;2001年03期

4 王先華,金慧,胡應(yīng)堂;施肥及耕作方式對不同母質(zhì)土壤腐殖質(zhì)含量的影響[J];湖北農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué);2005年06期

5 王先華;胡應(yīng)堂;方小寧;;不同培肥措施對黔東幾類土壤腐殖質(zhì)的影響[J];中國土壤與肥料;2006年05期

6 陳蘭;唐曉紅;魏朝富;;土壤腐殖質(zhì)結(jié)構(gòu)的光譜學(xué)研究進(jìn)展[J];中國農(nóng)學(xué)通報(bào);2007年08期

7 張鵬;;淺析甘肅省主要農(nóng)田土壤腐殖質(zhì)組分[J];農(nóng)業(yè)科技與信息;2008年23期

8 魏世勇;譚文峰;劉凡;;土壤腐殖質(zhì)—礦物質(zhì)交互作用的機(jī)制及研究進(jìn)展[J];中國土壤與肥料;2009年01期

9 龔偉;顏曉元;王景燕;胡庭興;宮淵波;;長期施肥對小麥-玉米作物系統(tǒng)土壤腐殖質(zhì)組分碳和氮的影響[J];植物營養(yǎng)與肥料學(xué)報(bào);2009年06期

10 楊俐蘋;白由路;王向陽;王磊;王賀;;比色法測定土壤腐殖質(zhì)組分的研究[J];腐植酸;2011年01期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前2條

1 楊志斌;楊忠芳;馮海艷;劉玉杰;王洪翠;;四川成都經(jīng)濟(jì)區(qū)土壤腐殖質(zhì)重金屬元素含量特征研究[A];中國礦物巖石地球化學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)第11屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2007年

2 陳麗珍;竇森;黃毅;馬麗娜;董麗娟;周鑫;;不同地力水平土壤腐殖質(zhì)組成研究[A];面向未來的土壤科學(xué)（中冊）——中國土壤學(xué)會(huì)第十二次全國會(huì)員代表大會(huì)暨第九屆海峽兩岸土壤肥料學(xué)術(shù)交流研討會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前1條

1 北京農(nóng)林科學(xué)院植物營養(yǎng)與資源研究所研究員 趙同科;科學(xué)施肥保護(hù)土壤環(huán)境[N];經(jīng)濟(jì)日報(bào);2014年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 張葛;自然和人為添加生物質(zhì)炭對土壤腐殖質(zhì)碳和黑碳的影響[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

2 崔俊濤;微生物在土壤腐殖質(zhì)形成與轉(zhuǎn)化中作用的研究[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

3 張偉;純培養(yǎng)和土壤中微生物形成的腐殖質(zhì)研究[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 盧萬鵬;桉樹人工林土壤腐殖質(zhì)及其與土壤主要養(yǎng)分的關(guān)系[D];廣西大學(xué);2015年

2 張艷鴻;秸稈深還及配施化肥對土壤理化性質(zhì)和腐殖質(zhì)的影響[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

3 李陽;長期施肥土壤腐殖質(zhì)變化及其與土壤酸度變化的關(guān)系[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2016年

4 劉鑫;水田不同開墾年限土壤腐殖質(zhì)特征的比較[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2015年

5 楊洋;灌溉方式對設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)含量及其組分的影響[D];沈陽農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2017年

6 王菊花;微生物對土壤腐殖質(zhì)形成及結(jié)構(gòu)的影響研究[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2007年

7 安紅艷;河北省主要土壤腐殖質(zhì)特征研究[D];中國農(nóng)業(yè)科學(xué)院;2012年

8 侯博特;好氧微生物在土壤腐殖質(zhì)形成中的作用研究[D];吉林農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2014年

9 李潤;設(shè)施土壤腐殖質(zhì)和有機(jī)氮形態(tài)演變及其與供氮能力關(guān)系的研究[D];山東農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2006年

10 褚慧;有機(jī)和常規(guī)種植模式下土壤腐殖質(zhì)特性研究[D];南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號(hào)：1507332