本文關(guān)鍵詞： -D打印技術(shù) 手術(shù)導(dǎo)板 骨腫瘤 修復(fù)重建　出處：《中國修復(fù)重建外科雜志》2014年03期 　論文類型：期刊論文

【摘要】：目的使用多種3-D打印技術(shù)制作手術(shù)導(dǎo)板,探討其在骨腫瘤切除重建手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用效果,并對比不同3-D打印技術(shù)制備的手術(shù)導(dǎo)板優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。方法回顧分析2012年9月-2014年1月符合選擇標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的31例骨腫瘤患者臨床資料,其中男19例,女12例;年齡6~67歲,中位年齡23歲。病程15 d~12個(gè)月,中位病程2個(gè)月。其中惡性腫瘤13例,良性腫瘤18例;腫瘤位于股骨9例、脊柱7例、脛骨6例、骨盆5例、肱骨3例、腓骨1例。根據(jù)術(shù)前薄層(0.625 mm)CT掃描等影像學(xué)檢查所得數(shù)據(jù)行術(shù)前腫瘤切除設(shè)計(jì),根據(jù)切除計(jì)劃設(shè)計(jì)手術(shù)導(dǎo)板。術(shù)前加工導(dǎo)板使用的3-D打印技術(shù)和材料分別為:熔融沉積成型9例(ABS樹脂)、光固化立體成型14例(光敏樹脂)、3-D印刷工藝5例(石膏)、選擇性激光燒結(jié)3例(鋁合金);導(dǎo)板滅菌后按術(shù)前計(jì)劃應(yīng)用于術(shù)中。通過對比導(dǎo)板制作加工時(shí)間分析4種3-D打印技術(shù)效率,記錄術(shù)前設(shè)計(jì)時(shí)間、手術(shù)時(shí)間、術(shù)中透視次數(shù),與同期同類常規(guī)手術(shù)28例(對照組)進(jìn)行比較。結(jié)果 4種導(dǎo)板制作加工時(shí)間分別為:熔融沉積成型(19.3±6.5)h、光固化立體成型(5.2±1.3)h、3-D印刷工藝(8.6±1.9)h、選擇性激光燒結(jié)(51.7±12.9)h,選擇性激光燒結(jié)導(dǎo)板制作加工時(shí)間明顯長于另外3種。31例均成功進(jìn)行術(shù)前設(shè)計(jì)、導(dǎo)板制作并應(yīng)用于手術(shù);除3例術(shù)中導(dǎo)板斷裂變形(ABS樹脂1例、石膏2例),改為常規(guī)手術(shù)治療外;余28例定位針均成功導(dǎo)入,根據(jù)定位針指引準(zhǔn)確按術(shù)前手術(shù)設(shè)計(jì)截骨。與對照組比較,28例患者術(shù)前設(shè)計(jì)時(shí)間延長、手術(shù)時(shí)間縮短、術(shù)中透視次數(shù)減少,差異均有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義(P0.05)。28例均獲隨訪,隨訪時(shí)間1~12個(gè)月,平均3.7個(gè)月。術(shù)后X線片及CT檢查示腫瘤均完整切除,大段同種異體骨重建穩(wěn)定。結(jié)論 3-D打印手術(shù)導(dǎo)板很好地適應(yīng)了骨腫瘤手術(shù)個(gè)體化要求,可在術(shù)中實(shí)現(xiàn)術(shù)前設(shè)計(jì),不同3-D打印技術(shù)制備的手術(shù)導(dǎo)板各有優(yōu)勢,需根據(jù)具體手術(shù)方式選擇。
[Abstract]:Objective to study the effect of using various 3-D printing techniques to make surgical guide plate in bone tumor resection and reconstruction. Methods from September 2012 to January 2014, 31 patients with bone tumor, including 19 males and 12 females, aged 6 to 67 years, were analyzed retrospectively. The median age was 23 years. The course of disease ranged from 15 days to 12 months, and the median course was 2 months. Among them, 13 cases were malignant tumors, 18 cases were benign tumors, 9 cases were located in femur, 7 cases in spine, 6 cases in tibia, 5 cases in pelvis, 3 cases in humerus. One case of fibula. According to the imaging data of preoperative thin-layer scan and 0.625 mm)CT scan, the preoperative tumor resection design was carried out. According to the plan of excision, the surgical guide plate was designed. The 3-D printing technique and materials used in the pre-operation processing of the guide plate were as follows: 9 cases of melt deposition molding and 14 cases of photosolidification stereoscopic molding (Guang Min resin / 3-D printing process 5 cases (gypsum)). Selective laser sintering was performed in 3 cases (aluminum alloy); the guide plate was sterilized and applied to the operation according to the pre-operation plan. The efficiency of four 3-D printing techniques was analyzed by comparing the processing time of the guide plate making, and analyzing the efficiency of the four kinds of 3-D printing technology. The design time, operation time and times of fluoroscopy were recorded. Results the processing time of four kinds of guide plates were 19.3 鹵6.5 hs, 5.2 鹵1.3 hh, 8.6 鹵1.9 hh, 51.7 鹵12.9 hh, respectively. The fabrication time of optical sintered guide plate was obviously longer than that of other 3 kinds. 31 cases were successfully designed before operation. The guide plate was made and applied to the operation, except for 3 cases of fracture and deformation of the guide plate, 1 case of ABS resin, 2 cases of gypsum, and 2 cases of plaster, the other 28 cases were successfully introduced into the needle. In comparison with the control group, the preoperative design time was prolonged, the operative time was shortened, the times of fluoroscopy were decreased, and the difference was statistically significant (P 0.05). 28 cases were followed up, according to the guidance of the positioning needle, and compared with the control group, the preoperative design time was prolonged, the operative time was shortened, and the times of fluoroscopy were decreased. The follow-up time ranged from 1 to 12 months (mean 3.7 months). X-ray and CT examinations showed that the tumor was resected completely and the large segment of allograft was stable. Conclusion the 3-D printing guide plate is very suitable for the individualization of bone tumor surgery. The preoperative design can be realized during the operation, and different 3-D printing techniques have their own advantages, which need to be selected according to the specific operation mode.
【作者單位】： 第四軍醫(yī)大學(xué)西京骨科醫(yī)院骨腫瘤科;
【分類號】：TP334.8;R738.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 詹佳;洪哠;童樹友;孫暉;李國超;孫輝;雷潔;王元銀;;三維影像配合手術(shù)導(dǎo)板在口腔種植中的美學(xué)應(yīng)用[J];中國美容醫(yī)學(xué);2013年02期

2 宋光保,李群英,黃建生,朱曉斌,周麗航;后牙區(qū)牙種植手術(shù)導(dǎo)板準(zhǔn)確性的初步研究[J];中國口腔頜面外科雜志;2004年03期

3 付軍;郭征;王臻;栗向東;范宏斌;李靖;裴延軍;裴國獻(xiàn);李丹;;多種3-D打印手術(shù)導(dǎo)板在骨腫瘤切除重建手術(shù)中的應(yīng)用[J];中國修復(fù)重建外科雜志;2014年03期

4 宋光保,黃建生,黃云飛,周磊,徐淑蘭;牙種植手術(shù)導(dǎo)板的孔深與受力方向和出孔位置關(guān)系[J];廣東醫(yī)學(xué);2002年12期

5 孫振宇;張明睿;陳光;王道富;劉慧;陶然;;手術(shù)導(dǎo)板對后牙區(qū)不翻瓣手術(shù)精度的影響[J];中國口腔頜面外科雜志;2011年06期

6 李志剛;郝智莉;鄒世琦;劉長營;;計(jì)算機(jī)輔助設(shè)計(jì)(CAD)的種植手術(shù)導(dǎo)板的應(yīng)用[J];中國口腔種植學(xué)雜志;2011年01期

7 胡秀蓮;蔣析;任抒欣;;種植外科手術(shù)導(dǎo)板數(shù)字化加工[J];中國實(shí)用口腔科雜志;2012年05期

8 李志剛;郝智莉;冷卓;劉寧;鄒世琦;劉長營;;計(jì)算機(jī)輔助設(shè)計(jì)和制造(CAD/CAM)的種植手術(shù)導(dǎo)板的應(yīng)用[J];現(xiàn)代口腔醫(yī)學(xué)雜志;2012年04期

9 夏榮;種植體最佳植入方向的CT掃描數(shù)據(jù)庫[J];國外醫(yī)學(xué).口腔醫(yī)學(xué)分冊;1994年05期

10 ;[J];;年期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 黎浩斌;三維影像配合手術(shù)導(dǎo)板于牙種植之臨床研究與應(yīng)用[D];安徽醫(yī)科大學(xué);2009年

，

本文編號：1507198