【摘要】：長(zhǎng)期以來(lái),礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)追求利益最大化、忽視承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的現(xiàn)象普遍存在,企業(yè)在經(jīng)營(yíng)過(guò)程中,大量占有和開(kāi)采礦產(chǎn)資源,激發(fā)社會(huì)矛盾,影響自然環(huán)境,帶來(lái)許多的問(wèn)題。針對(duì)上述問(wèn)題,民眾對(duì)有關(guān)企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任的呼聲日益高漲,國(guó)家政府的監(jiān)督管理也在逐漸加強(qiáng)。在這種情形下,礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)面臨著兩難的境地:一方面單純追求利益,不符合時(shí)代要求;另一方面承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任,則要加大企業(yè)的支出成本。那么,協(xié)調(diào)好企業(yè)利益與社會(huì)責(zé)任的關(guān)系,促進(jìn)企業(yè)均衡發(fā)展,就是一個(gè)需要思考和研究的現(xiàn)實(shí)重大問(wèn)題,既關(guān)系著社會(huì)穩(wěn)定,也直接影響到我國(guó)的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)向前發(fā)展。因此,解決好這個(gè)重大問(wèn)題,從一定程度上來(lái)講,有利于我國(guó)深化改革、全面協(xié)調(diào)可持續(xù)發(fā)展。本文針對(duì)礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效的關(guān)系,重點(diǎn)進(jìn)行了五個(gè)方面的研究和論述。第一,歸納梳理國(guó)內(nèi)外關(guān)于社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效關(guān)系的相關(guān)文獻(xiàn),發(fā)現(xiàn)三種不同觀點(diǎn):社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效呈正相關(guān)、負(fù)相關(guān)或者沒(méi)有明顯關(guān)系。第二,介紹企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任理論的產(chǎn)生及發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀。第三,描述我國(guó)礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)現(xiàn)狀,探討企業(yè)在承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任方面存在的問(wèn)題,主要有:企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任覆蓋面窄、不公開(kāi)社會(huì)責(zé)任報(bào)告、無(wú)法達(dá)到承諾的社會(huì)責(zé)任。第四,分析國(guó)內(nèi)外企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任管理經(jīng)驗(yàn),為我國(guó)加強(qiáng)企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任提供經(jīng)驗(yàn)支持。第五,利用17家上市礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)2010-2013年企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任的有關(guān)數(shù)據(jù),運(yùn)用多元回歸模型與虛擬變量模型,分析企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任總體效應(yīng)與企業(yè)績(jī)效的關(guān)系、五類核心利益相關(guān)者社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效的關(guān)系、國(guó)有控股與國(guó)有參股礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)影響力的差別,結(jié)果表明:(1)上市礦產(chǎn)資源企業(yè)總體社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響在2011年-2012年間由負(fù)相關(guān)轉(zhuǎn)向正相關(guān),說(shuō)明礦產(chǎn)資源企業(yè)承擔(dān)社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)績(jī)效的影響逐步轉(zhuǎn)好;(2)2013年的研究表明,環(huán)境責(zé)任、社會(huì)責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效呈正相關(guān),表明加強(qiáng)企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任有利于提高企業(yè)績(jī)效;但投資者責(zé)任、員工責(zé)任、顧客和供應(yīng)商責(zé)任與企業(yè)績(jī)效相關(guān)關(guān)系不顯著;(3)國(guó)有控股與國(guó)有參股企業(yè)兩類企業(yè)的社會(huì)責(zé)任對(duì)企業(yè)績(jī)效的影響沒(méi)有差別。本文基于分析結(jié)果,結(jié)合國(guó)內(nèi)外礦產(chǎn)資源型企業(yè)社會(huì)責(zé)任管理經(jīng)驗(yàn),針對(duì)性地提出對(duì)策建議:第一,完善企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的機(jī)制,營(yíng)造良好社會(huì)環(huán)境;第二,企業(yè)要強(qiáng)化履行社會(huì)責(zé)任的意識(shí)和作為;第三,對(duì)公眾來(lái)說(shuō),支持和監(jiān)督企業(yè)履行社會(huì)責(zé)任,是促進(jìn)經(jīng)濟(jì)社會(huì)建設(shè)發(fā)展的有利因素。
[Abstract]:For a long time, mineral resource-based enterprises have been seeking for maximum benefits and neglecting to bear social responsibility. In the course of operation, enterprises occupy and exploit mineral resources in large quantities, stimulate social contradictions and affect the natural environment. Cause a lot of problems. In response to the above problems, the public is increasingly calling for corporate social responsibility, and the supervision and management of the national government is also gradually strengthened. In this case, mineral resources enterprises are faced with a dilemma: on the one hand, the pursuit of interests is not in line with the requirements of the times; on the other hand, it is necessary to increase the expenditure cost of enterprises if they undertake social responsibility. Therefore, to coordinate the relationship between corporate interests and social responsibility and to promote the balanced development of enterprises is a practical and important issue that needs to be considered and studied. It is not only related to social stability, but also directly affects the social and economic development of our country. Therefore, to solve this important problem, to a certain extent, conducive to deepening reform, overall coordinated and sustainable development. In this paper, the relationship between social responsibility and corporate performance of mineral resources enterprises is studied and discussed in five aspects. First, it summarizes the domestic and foreign literature on the relationship between social responsibility and corporate performance, and finds three different views: social responsibility and corporate performance are positively correlated, negative correlation or no obvious relationship. Second, introduce the emergence and development of corporate social responsibility theory. Thirdly, it describes the present situation of mineral resources enterprises in China and discusses the problems existing in undertaking social responsibility. The main problems are as follows: the coverage of corporate social responsibility is narrow, the social responsibility report is not made public, and the social responsibility can not be achieved. Fourthly, it analyzes the experience of corporate social responsibility management at home and abroad, and provides experience support for strengthening corporate social responsibility in our country. Fifth, using the relevant data of corporate social responsibility of 17 listed mineral resource enterprises from 2010 to 2013, using multiple regression model and virtual variable model, the relationship between corporate social responsibility overall effect and corporate performance is analyzed. The relationship between social responsibility and enterprise performance of five types of core stakeholders, the difference of influence between state-owned holding and state-owned shareholding mineral resources enterprises, The results show that: (1) the impact of overall social responsibility and corporate performance of listed mineral resources enterprises changed from negative to positive from 2011 to 2012, indicating that the impact of social responsibility on performance of mineral resources enterprises gradually improved; (2) the 2013 study shows that environmental responsibility, social responsibility and corporate performance are positively correlated, indicating that strengthening corporate social responsibility is conducive to improving corporate performance; However, the relationship between investor responsibility, employee responsibility, customer and supplier responsibility and enterprise performance is not significant; (3) there is no difference in the influence of social responsibility between state-owned holding and state-owned shareholding enterprises on corporate performance. Based on the analysis results, combined with the experience of social responsibility management of mineral resources enterprises at home and abroad, this paper puts forward countermeasures and suggestions: first, perfect the mechanism of enterprises to fulfill their social responsibility, and create a good social environment; Second, enterprises should strengthen the consciousness and action of fulfilling social responsibility; third, to the public, supporting and supervising enterprises to fulfill their social responsibility is a favorable factor to promote the development of economic and social construction.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中南民族大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：F270;F272.5;F426.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 董綺;;論我國(guó)資源型企業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力的構(gòu)成及培育[J];科技資訊;2008年08期

2 姚宏彥;惠寧;;資源型企業(yè)和諧創(chuàng)新發(fā)展路徑探析[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2009年08期

3 徐之舟;蔡仲秋;;資源型企業(yè)群落界定與構(gòu)造的系統(tǒng)分析——基于網(wǎng)絡(luò)的視角[J];科技進(jìn)步與對(duì)策;2011年05期

4 趙敏;四問(wèn)西部牦牛資源型企業(yè)如何健康發(fā)展[J];科技智囊;2004年05期

5 鄧漢慧;;資源型企業(yè)核心利益相關(guān)者的界定[J];統(tǒng)計(jì)與決策;2007年06期

6 陳明政;方思敏;;我國(guó)資源型企業(yè)可持續(xù)發(fā)展制約因素分析[J];理論月刊;2008年04期

7 柯小玲;楊昌明;諸克軍;;資源型企業(yè)核心競(jìng)爭(zhēng)力評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[J];礦業(yè)研究與開(kāi)發(fā);2009年04期

8 蔡仲秋;張青;;資源型企業(yè)群落創(chuàng)業(yè)治理機(jī)制的研究[J];技術(shù)與創(chuàng)新管理;2010年05期

9 張青;徐之舟;蔡仲秋;;資源型企業(yè)群落脆弱性評(píng)價(jià)與治理模式[J];軟科學(xué);2011年05期

10 李鵬;郭曉川;;基于內(nèi)蒙古本土資源型企業(yè)案例的戰(zhàn)略選擇模型研究[J];科學(xué)管理研究;2011年05期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前5條

1 胡新欣;付永水;黃津孚;;成果評(píng)介3：資源型企業(yè)發(fā)展接續(xù)產(chǎn)業(yè)的決策與管理[A];以科學(xué)發(fā)展觀引領(lǐng)管理創(chuàng)新——2005年全國(guó)企業(yè)管理創(chuàng)新大會(huì)資料匯編[C];2005年

2 王n，

本文編號(hào)：2414299