【摘要】：利用云南2014年10月7日景谷6.6級、8月3日魯?shù)?.5級地震序列的波形與震相資料,消除區(qū)域地震波衰減與臺站場地響應(yīng)后,計算得到2次地震序列的應(yīng)力降。結(jié)果顯示,在研究所涉及的震級范圍內(nèi),應(yīng)力降呈現(xiàn)隨震級增大而增大的趨勢。為盡可能消除震級對應(yīng)力降的影響,對比了相同震級檔地震的應(yīng)力降,結(jié)果顯示,景谷地震序列的平均應(yīng)力降明顯高于魯?shù)榈卣?這可能與2次6.5級左右地震后震源區(qū)的應(yīng)力狀態(tài)有關(guān)。從序列余震應(yīng)力降的時、空變化對比來看,景谷6.6級地震后至2014年12月6日5.8、5.9級強(qiáng)余震發(fā)生前,應(yīng)力降變化呈現(xiàn)先緩慢下降、進(jìn)而轉(zhuǎn)折升高并持續(xù)高值的變化過程;同時,高應(yīng)力降地震在空間上主要集中于5.8級強(qiáng)余震區(qū)域。這表明,主震發(fā)生后經(jīng)過一個較短期的調(diào)整之后,5.8級強(qiáng)余震震源區(qū)的應(yīng)力環(huán)境可能持續(xù)增強(qiáng)。5.8、5.9級強(qiáng)余震發(fā)生后,地震序列應(yīng)力降快速下降至相對穩(wěn)定狀態(tài)。研究表明,2次6級左右強(qiáng)余震發(fā)生后,震源附近區(qū)域應(yīng)力得到一定程度的釋放,應(yīng)力環(huán)境降低,地震序列活動也趨于結(jié)束。對于后續(xù)沒有強(qiáng)余震發(fā)生的魯?shù)榈卣鹦蛄?余震應(yīng)力降小于景谷地震序列相同震級檔地震的平均應(yīng)力降,同時,主震后余震序列的應(yīng)力降在時間上幾乎未發(fā)生太大的變化;結(jié)合主震能量釋放特點推測,震源區(qū)的應(yīng)力在主震破裂過程中已得到較多的釋放,主震后震源區(qū)應(yīng)力變化呈現(xiàn)逐漸恢復(fù)的過程,這可能是魯?shù)榈卣鹩嗾鸹顒用黠@較弱,后續(xù)亦未有較強(qiáng)余震發(fā)生的原因之一。
[Abstract]:Using the waveform and phase data of Yunnan Jinggu M = 6.6 earthquake sequence on October 7, 2014 and Ludian M = 6.5 earthquake sequence on August 3, 2014, the regional seismic wave attenuation and the site response of the station are eliminated, and the stress drop of the two earthquake sequences is calculated. The results show that the stress drop increases with the increase of magnitude. In order to eliminate the influence of magnitude on the stress drop as far as possible, the stress drop of the same magnitude earthquake is compared. The results show that the average stress drop of the Jinggu earthquake sequence is obviously higher than that of the Ludian earthquake. This may be related to the stress state in the focal area after two earthquakes with magnitude 6.5 or so. From the point of view of the stress drop of the sequence aftershocks, the variation of the stress drop after the Jinggu earthquake (M = 6.6) and before the aftershock with M = 5.890 M = 5.9 on December 6, 2014 shows a slow decrease, then a turning point and a continuous high value. The high stress drop earthquakes are mainly concentrated in the region of strong aftershocks with M = 5.8 in space. This indicates that after a relatively short period of adjustment after the occurrence of the main shock, the stress environment in the focal area of the strong aftershock with M = 5.8 may continue to strengthen. After the occurrence of the strong aftershock with M = 5.8 or M = 5.9, the stress drop of the earthquake sequence rapidly decreases to a relatively stable state. The results show that after two strong aftershocks with magnitude 6 or so, the regional stress near the earthquake source is released to a certain extent, the stress environment decreases, and the earthquake sequence activities tend to end. For the Ludian earthquake sequence with no strong aftershocks, the aftershock stress drop is smaller than the average stress drop of the same magnitude earthquake in Jinggu earthquake sequence, and the stress drop of the aftershock sequence after the main earthquake almost does not change much in time. Combined with the characteristics of the energy release of the main shock, it is inferred that the stress in the focal area has been released more during the rupture process of the main shock, and the stress variation in the focal area has gradually recovered after the main earthquake, which may be due to the obvious weakness of the aftershock activity of the Ludian earthquake. No strong aftershocks have occurred since then.
【作者單位】： 中國地震局地震預(yù)測研究所;中國地震臺網(wǎng)中心;
【基金】：中國地震局監(jiān)測預(yù)報司2016年度任務(wù)性科技專項(1640401320716)資助
【分類號】：P315

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 肖蔚文,黃琦,王榮君;不同地震區(qū)應(yīng)力降分布與分形特征[J];地震學(xué)報;1992年03期

2 王培玲;姚家駿;劉文邦;馬玉虎;夏愛國;;玉樹地區(qū)兩次強(qiáng)震序列應(yīng)力降對比研究[J];內(nèi)陸地震;2013年04期

3 臧紹先;地震應(yīng)力降與巖石破裂應(yīng)力降[J];地震學(xué)報;1984年02期

4 呂培苓;劉連柱;;1981年邢臺5.8級強(qiáng)余震前后小地震的應(yīng)力降估計[J];華北地震科學(xué);1986年02期

5 卓鈺如,劉韜;京津地區(qū)小地震(1986—1988)的應(yīng)力降分布[J];地震;1989年06期

6 萬永革;;根據(jù)大地震前后應(yīng)力軸偏轉(zhuǎn)和應(yīng)力降求取應(yīng)力量值的研究[J];地震學(xué)報;2006年05期

7 黃懷勇;地震應(yīng)力降的討論[J];地球物理學(xué)報;1978年04期

8 金亞夫;云南省及其鄰區(qū)部分中強(qiáng)地震應(yīng)力降特征[J];地震研究;1984年02期

9 王繩祖;震源應(yīng)力降、錯動速度及突發(fā)失穩(wěn)判據(jù)[J];地震地質(zhì);1990年03期

10 劉韜,卓鈺如;京津地區(qū)小震(1986—1989)應(yīng)力降分布[J];地震;1991年01期

相關(guān)會議論文 前5條

1 何昌榮;張流;;不同摩擦理論下單自由度系統(tǒng)中剛度對應(yīng)力降的影響[A];中國地震學(xué)會第五次學(xué)術(shù)大會論文摘要集[C];1994年

2 萬永革;;根據(jù)強(qiáng)震前后三維應(yīng)力方向變化和地震應(yīng)力降估計構(gòu)造應(yīng)力量值[A];中國地球物理第二十一屆年會論文集[C];2005年

3 施行覺;趙冬林;郭自強(qiáng);;雙剪摩擦滑動的實驗和分析[A];第四屆全國構(gòu)造物理、第二屆全國高溫高壓聯(lián)合學(xué)術(shù)討論會論文摘要[C];1989年

4 郭增建;秦保燕;榮代潞;;組合模式和應(yīng)力降與地震預(yù)報[A];1998年中國地球物理學(xué)會第十四屆學(xué)術(shù)年會論文集[C];1998年

5 馬勝利;王凱英;陳順云;陳國強(qiáng);扈小燕;;應(yīng)力擾動對摩擦滑動影響的實驗研究[A];中國地球物理學(xué)會第22屆年會論文集[C];2006年

，

本文編號：2286900