本文選題：鐵礦資源 + 勘查開發(fā)基地　； 參考：《中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：鐵礦是我國鋼鐵行業(yè)發(fā)展的重要物質(zhì)保障,在我國礦業(yè)中占有重要的地位。雖然我國鐵礦資源相對豐富,分布廣泛,鐵礦資源勘查開發(fā)布局不斷優(yōu)化,但長期以來,鐵礦資源的供需矛盾一直很突出,資源安全形勢不容樂觀。第三輪全國礦產(chǎn)資源規(guī)劃編制中提出了“礦產(chǎn)資源勘查開發(fā)基地”的概念,并將其定位為保障我國鐵礦資源安全的戰(zhàn)略核心區(qū)域,但并沒有明確具體劃分標(biāo)準(zhǔn)和技術(shù)方法�；诖�,本文將鐵礦資源勘查開發(fā)基地劃分作為研究問題,在產(chǎn)業(yè)集聚理論、區(qū)域分工理論指導(dǎo)下,通過對影響鐵礦資源開發(fā)基地劃定的因素進(jìn)行分析,構(gòu)建了鐵礦資源開發(fā)基地劃定指標(biāo)體系,選擇SOFM自組織特征映射網(wǎng)絡(luò)聚類方法,應(yīng)用MATLAB7.0.1和ARCGIS9.3軟件平臺,對聚類分析結(jié)果進(jìn)行修正后,提出了我國鐵礦資源勘查開發(fā)基地劃分方案,并對所有基地進(jìn)行了評價分析和分類。研究結(jié)果表明:我國大致可劃分出十一個鐵礦資源勘查開發(fā)基地,分別為冀東北基地、吉遼基地、攀滇基地、晉中北基地、晉冀豫基地、蒙中基地、豫西基地、鄂豫皖基地、隴新基地、陜鄂基地和魯東南基地;十一個基地查明資源儲量、設(shè)計開采規(guī)模和大中型礦山數(shù)量分別占到了全國的89.7%、78.6%和74.4%,涵蓋了全國大部分的礦產(chǎn)資源及其開發(fā)利用活動,能夠在空間上形成保障我國鐵礦資源安全的核心區(qū)域,其中冀東北基地、吉遼基地、攀滇基地和豫鄂皖基地是我國鐵礦資源賦存和開發(fā)利用活動最為集中分布的地區(qū);依據(jù)6項(xiàng)指標(biāo)的分級判別,將11個鐵礦資源勘查開發(fā)基地劃分為主力勘查開發(fā)基地、戰(zhàn)略后備基地和協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展基地,并對各基地開發(fā)利用方向提出了建議,以期為我國鐵礦資源優(yōu)化布局、規(guī)模開發(fā)以及其他礦種資源勘查開發(fā)基地劃分及管理決策提供借鑒。
[Abstract]:Iron ore is an important material guarantee for the development of China's iron and steel industry, and plays an important role in China's mining industry. Although China's iron ore resources are relatively rich and widely distributed, the distribution of iron ore resources exploration and development is constantly optimized, but for a long time, the contradiction between supply and demand of iron ore resources has been prominent, and the situation of resource security is not optimistic. In the third round of national mineral resources planning, the concept of "mineral resources exploration and development base" is put forward, and it is positioned as the strategic core area to ensure the safety of China's iron ore resources, but there is no specific division standard and technical method. Based on this, this paper takes the division of exploration and development base of iron ore resources as a research problem. Under the guidance of industrial agglomeration theory and regional division of labor theory, this paper analyzes the factors that affect the delineation of iron ore resources development base. In this paper, an index system for delineation of iron ore resource development base is constructed, and the clustering method of SOFM self-organizing feature mapping network is selected. The results of clustering analysis are corrected by using MATLAB 7.0.1 and ARCGIS 9.3 software platform. This paper puts forward the plan of dividing the exploration and development bases of iron ore resources in China, and evaluates, analyzes and classifies all the bases. The results show that eleven iron ore exploration and development bases can be roughly divided into northeast Hebei base, Jiliao base, Pandian base, northern Shanxi base, Shanxi and Hebei base, central Mongolian base, western Henan base, Hubei, Henan and Anhui base. Longxin Base, Shaanxi-Hubei Base and Southeast Shandong Base; 11 bases have identified the reserves of resources, designed the scale of exploitation and the number of large and medium-sized mines accounted for 89.78.6% and 74.4% of the national total, respectively, covering most of the mineral resources and their development and utilization activities throughout the country. It can form the core area in space to ensure the safety of iron ore resources in our country. The northeast Hebei base, the Jiliao base, the Pandian base and the Henan, Hubei and Anhui bases are the most concentrated areas of iron ore resources occurrence and exploitation and utilization in China. According to the classification of 6 indexes, 11 iron ore exploration and development bases are divided into main exploration and development bases, strategic reserve bases and coordinated development bases, and some suggestions are put forward for the development and utilization of each base. In order to provide reference for optimizing the distribution of iron ore resources, scale development and other mineral resources exploration and development base division and management decision.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F426.1

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 滕吉文;劉建明;劉財;姚敬金;韓立國;張永謙;;第二深度空間金屬礦產(chǎn)探查與東北戰(zhàn)略后備基地的建立和可持續(xù)發(fā)展[J];吉林大學(xué)學(xué)報(地球科學(xué)版);2007年04期

2 孫靜;羅照華;張長厚;郭少豐;李健;杜維河;王德忠;潘穎;周久龍;李旭東;;大廟鐵礦田——危機(jī)礦山還是潛在超大型鐵礦基地[J];中國地質(zhì);2009年02期

3 梁仁彩;試論能源基地的類型及其綜合發(fā)展[J];地理研究;1985年02期

4 徐葉兵;鄧軍;;我國鐵礦資源保障對策探討[J];國土資源情報;2006年06期

5 張學(xué)儒;張鐿鋰;劉林山;張繼平;;基于SOFM神經(jīng)網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型的土地類型分區(qū)嘗試——以青藏高原東部樣帶為例[J];地理研究;2013年05期

6 王書彬;田彥平;;中國九大鋼鐵基地[J];地理教育;2008年06期

7 王春紅;郝彬彬;孟玉雙;;神東煤炭基地煤炭資源開發(fā)與區(qū)域環(huán)境協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展[J];河北工程大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2009年01期

8 薛秋;胡繼康;;大豐港建設(shè)能源基地可行性分析研究[J];海洋開發(fā)與管理;2006年06期

9 丁易;;國家大型煤炭基地規(guī)劃概述[J];煤炭工程;2007年02期

10 胡雋秋;;新疆自治區(qū)大型煤炭基地建設(shè)方略[J];煤炭經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年03期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 ;[N];證券時報;2006年

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 李建武;青海南部礦產(chǎn)資源接替區(qū)技術(shù)經(jīng)濟(jì)與社會效益評價[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2008年

2 王來峰;湖北省礦產(chǎn)資源經(jīng)濟(jì)分區(qū)及管理政策研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué);2013年

3 張紉蘭;重要大宗金屬礦產(chǎn)資源戰(zhàn)略接續(xù)區(qū)綜合評價與區(qū)劃[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué);2014年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前3條

1 施智明;新型工業(yè)化道路的理論探討與分析[D];合肥工業(yè)大學(xué);2005年

2 曹飛;本溪地區(qū)礦產(chǎn)資源優(yōu)化利用的研究[D];東北大學(xué);2005年

3 李天澤;建設(shè)山西新型能源基地的區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)政策研究[D];太原理工大學(xué);2007年

，

本文編號：2094951