發(fā)布時間：2018-05-19 05:49

  本文選題：礦業(yè)權(quán) + 政府管理��； 參考：《山東財經(jīng)大學》2015年碩士論文

【摘要】：礦產(chǎn)資源不可再生,其開發(fā)利用關(guān)乎國計民生,對國家長遠發(fā)展有著戰(zhàn)略性重大意義。我國礦政管理的核心內(nèi)容是礦業(yè)權(quán)管理,礦業(yè)權(quán)管理即探礦權(quán)、采礦權(quán)管理,是政府相應(yīng)的管理部門對礦產(chǎn)資源所有權(quán)和收益的管控,維護礦業(yè)權(quán)的公平公正。礦業(yè)權(quán)管理領(lǐng)域的法律依據(jù)是1986年制定、1996年修訂后實施的《礦產(chǎn)資源法》,隨后在礦業(yè)權(quán)登記、開采、轉(zhuǎn)讓等方面的相關(guān)管理規(guī)定及通知辦法陸續(xù)出臺,礦業(yè)權(quán)管理才進一步得到了規(guī)范。礦業(yè)權(quán)管理的主體是各級政府部門,其地位關(guān)鍵、作用舉足輕重。科學合理地定位政府管理職能,直接影響著礦業(yè)權(quán)行政管理的效能,決定著執(zhí)行有關(guān)政策的到位程度,并進一步關(guān)系到對礦產(chǎn)資源的合理利用及保護,實現(xiàn)可持續(xù)發(fā)展問題。然而,礦業(yè)權(quán)管理的實踐表明,現(xiàn)實中仍然有一些制約礦業(yè)權(quán)流轉(zhuǎn)和礦業(yè)發(fā)展進步的問題不同程度地存在著。該項研究從實證的角度出發(fā),以礦產(chǎn)資源相對豐富的A省為例,從地方層面入手分析我國政府礦業(yè)權(quán)管理現(xiàn)狀和存在的問題。主要歸納出以下幾個方面的問題:礦業(yè)權(quán)管理主體混淆、政府職責的定位不科學以及與其他組織關(guān)系的處理不規(guī)范。研究發(fā)現(xiàn),政府管理理念滯后、法律制度不完善、礦產(chǎn)資源管理體制機制不合理,是造成我國政府礦業(yè)權(quán)管理產(chǎn)生諸多問題的深層次原因。為了使政府礦業(yè)權(quán)管理的職能定位更加科學合理,本文對此進行了系統(tǒng)的分析,提出在遵循以礦業(yè)大局為出發(fā)點、理順各級權(quán)責義務(wù)、協(xié)調(diào)維護各部門關(guān)系的原則下,構(gòu)建起職能定位的基本框架。這個框架包括對創(chuàng)新定位管理理念、優(yōu)化政府內(nèi)部權(quán)責關(guān)系、理順政府與非政府的關(guān)系以及建立保障機制的整體構(gòu)想。研究認為,未來的政府礦業(yè)權(quán)管理改革,應(yīng)從我國礦業(yè)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展國情出發(fā),建議在管理方式上實行分級分類管理。分級管理就是在基本格局不變的前提下推行的分級授權(quán)管理模式,國土資源部下放除了戰(zhàn)略性礦產(chǎn)資源以外的其他礦產(chǎn)的審批權(quán)至各級地方政府,并根據(jù)實際執(zhí)行情況定期調(diào)整授權(quán);分類管理就是根據(jù)礦產(chǎn)資源勘查開發(fā)的作用差異性采取不同管理政策,鼓勵勘查,科學開發(fā),突出優(yōu)勢,避免浪費。本文還提出了四個方面的完善措施:一是向服務(wù)型政府轉(zhuǎn)變。轉(zhuǎn)變政府的礦業(yè)權(quán)管理理念,合理劃分各級政府權(quán)責,改革礦業(yè)權(quán)管理體制;二是加強政府的公共服務(wù)職能建設(shè)。充分發(fā)揮調(diào)節(jié)調(diào)控作用,完善監(jiān)督管理機制,做好規(guī)劃調(diào)控和公共服務(wù),完善溝通與信息公開機制;三是理順政府與其他組織的關(guān)系。促進政企分開、政事分開、政資分開,規(guī)范礦業(yè)權(quán)管理中介組織。只有這樣,才能確保礦產(chǎn)資源合理開發(fā)利用,保證國民經(jīng)濟健康可持續(xù)發(fā)展,實現(xiàn)建設(shè)服務(wù)型政府的執(zhí)政理念。
[Abstract]:Mineral resources are not renewable, its development and utilization is of great strategic significance to the national economy and people's livelihood. The core content of mining administration in China is the management of mining rights, which is the management of prospecting rights and mining rights, which is the control of the ownership and income of mineral resources by the corresponding administrative departments of the government, and the maintenance of the fairness and fairness of mining rights. The legal basis in the field of mining rights management is the Mineral Resources Law, which was enacted in 1986 and revised in 1996. Subsequently, the relevant regulations and notification measures on the registration, mining and transfer of mining rights have been issued one after another. Mining right management has been further standardized. The main body of mining right management is government departments at all levels. The scientific and reasonable positioning of government management functions directly affects the efficiency of mining rights administration, determines the degree of implementation of relevant policies, and further relates to the rational utilization and protection of mineral resources and the realization of sustainable development. However, the practice of mining right management shows that there are still some problems which restrict the circulation of mining rights and the development and progress of mining industry. From the point of view of demonstration, this study takes A province, which is relatively rich in mineral resources, as an example, and analyzes the present situation and existing problems of mining right management in our government from the local level. The main problems are summarized as follows: the confusion of the subject of mining right management, the unscientific orientation of the government's responsibility and the non-standard handling of the relationship with other organizations. It is found that the lag of the concept of government management, the imperfect legal system and the unreasonable mechanism of mineral resources management system are the deep-seated causes of many problems in the management of government mining rights in our country. In order to make the function orientation of government mining right management more scientific and reasonable, this paper makes a systematic analysis of this, and puts forward that under the principle of taking the overall situation of mining as the starting point, straightening out the rights, responsibilities and obligations at all levels, and coordinating and maintaining the relations between various departments, Construct the basic frame of function orientation. The framework includes the concept of innovative positioning management, the optimization of the relationship between power and responsibility within the government, the straightening out of the relationship between the government and the non-governmental government, and the overall idea of establishing a guarantee mechanism. The study shows that the future reform of government mining right management should proceed from the situation of mining economy development in China and suggest the implementation of classified management in the management mode. Hierarchical management is a hierarchical authorization management model implemented on the premise that the basic pattern remains unchanged. The Ministry of Land and Resources has delegated the power of examination and approval of other minerals other than strategic mineral resources to local governments at all levels. The classification management is to adopt different management policies according to the differences in the role of mineral resources exploration and development, encourage exploration, scientific development, highlight advantages and avoid waste. This article also proposed four aspects of improvement measures: first, to the service-oriented government transformation. The second is to strengthen the construction of the public service function of the government, to change the concept of mining right management of the government, to reasonably divide the power and responsibility of the governments at all levels, to reform the management system of the mining rights. We should give full play to the role of regulation and control, perfect the mechanism of supervision and management, do a good job of planning, control and public services, and perfect the mechanism of communication and information disclosure; third, we should straighten out the relationship between the government and other organizations. Promote separation of government and enterprises, separation of government and business, separation of government and capital, and regulation of intermediary organizations for the management of mining rights. Only in this way can we ensure the rational exploitation and utilization of mineral resources, ensure the healthy and sustainable development of the national economy, and realize the governing concept of building a service-oriented government.
【學位授予單位】：山東財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2015
【分類號】：F426.1

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 曹樹培;;政府在礦業(yè)權(quán)管理和市場運行中的定位[J];國土資源情報;2007年11期

2 鮑榮華;;對我國礦業(yè)權(quán)管理制度建設(shè)的幾點建議[J];國土資源情報;2007年12期

3 張婷婷;李守義;孫英男;柴璐;;探討礦業(yè)權(quán)經(jīng)濟意義 加強礦業(yè)權(quán)市場建設(shè)[J];吉林地質(zhì);2006年02期

4 徐磊;;治理理論與我國政府管理創(chuàng)新[J];理論前沿;2009年12期

5 薛瀾;張帆;;治理理論與中國政府職能重構(gòu)[J];人民論壇·學術(shù)前沿;2012年04期

6 趙景來;;關(guān)于治理理論若干問題討論綜述[J];世界經(jīng)濟與政治;2002年03期

7 袁懷雨;李克慶;;資源稅與礦產(chǎn)資源補償費制度改革[J];有色金屬礦產(chǎn)與勘查;2000年S1期

8 胡遠群;加強兩權(quán)市場的宏觀調(diào)控[J];中國國土資源經(jīng)濟;2004年03期

9 陳小華;淺談礦業(yè)權(quán)管理的理論與實踐[J];中國礦業(yè);2004年06期

10 康紀田;黃永香;;礦業(yè)市場進入管制研究——基于全國性礦產(chǎn)資源整合運動的發(fā)現(xiàn)[J];資源與產(chǎn)業(yè);2010年05期

相關(guān)重要報紙文章 前1條

1 胡魁;[N];中國礦業(yè)報;2008年

相關(guān)碩士學位論文 前4條

1 李紅霞;礦業(yè)權(quán)相關(guān)問題研究[D];北京林業(yè)大學;2007年

2 李友梅;我國礦業(yè)權(quán)管理中政府的職能定位研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學（北京）;2009年

3 張沖;礦業(yè)權(quán)研究[D];河北大學;2008年

4 藺征;礦產(chǎn)資源整合中政府職能定位研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(北京);2012年

，

本文編號：1908951