一次成功的專題研討會(huì):“多成因的軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造及地震巖”
發(fā)布時(shí)間:2018-04-28 04:43
本文選題:多成因的軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造 + 地震巖 ; 參考:《古地理學(xué)報(bào)》2017年01期
【摘要】:"多成因的軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造及地震巖"專題研討會(huì),2016年9月24日在河南焦作河南理工大學(xué)承辦的第14屆全國古地理學(xué)及沉積學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議期間召開。國內(nèi)多位專家出席這次研討會(huì),對(duì)軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造、地震巖、震積巖等問題進(jìn)行討論和爭(zhēng)鳴。這是一次十分成功的研討會(huì),其主要成果是:(1)"多成因的軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造"已為廣大地質(zhì)學(xué)家接受。(2)賽拉赫(Seilacher,1969)提出的"地震巖"(seismites)的定義,即"具斷層—粒序的巖層可定為地震巖",應(yīng)該廢棄;但現(xiàn)在為廣大地質(zhì)學(xué)家所接受的地震巖的定義,即"地震巖是真正由地震引起的具軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造的巖層",則不應(yīng)廢棄,可以保留下來。(3)"地震巖"這個(gè)術(shù)語應(yīng)嚴(yán)格地限制在真正由地震引起的具軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造的巖層。(4)"震積巖"是一個(gè)誤譯的術(shù)語,不宜繼續(xù)使用。如果有的地質(zhì)學(xué)家想繼續(xù)使用這個(gè)術(shù)語,應(yīng)對(duì)這個(gè)術(shù)語重新定義,并指明它不是"seismites"(地震巖)的中文譯名。(5)碎屑注入體也是多成因的,它不一定是地震巖,更不一定是"原地地震"的標(biāo)志。(6)本次研討會(huì)的最重要的成果是中國軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造及地震巖研究中的"幾乎是一個(gè)觀點(diǎn)"的局面開始被扭轉(zhuǎn)過來了,呈現(xiàn)出了"百花齊放和百家爭(zhēng)鳴"的學(xué)術(shù)氣氛。
[Abstract]:The Symposium on "Multi-Genetic soft sediment deformation structures and Seismic Rocks" was held on September 24, 2016, during the 14th National Conference on Palaeogeography and sedimentology, hosted by Henan University of Technology in Jiaozuo, Henan Province. A number of domestic experts attended the seminar to discuss and contend on the deformation structure, seismic rock and seismosedimentary rock of soft sediments. This was a very successful seminar, the main outcome of which was the "multigenetic soft sediment deformation structure", which has been accepted by many geologists as the definition of "seismic rock" proposed by Seilachern Sailachern (1969). That is, "rock with fault-grain sequence can be classified as seismic rock" and should be abandoned. However, the definition of seismic rock, which is now accepted by many geologists, that is, "seismic rock is a rock with soft sediment deformation structure really caused by earthquakes" should not be abandoned. The term "seismic rock" should be strictly limited to the strata with deformation structure of soft sediment caused by earthquake.) "seismoclase" is a misinterpreted term and should not be used any more. If some geologists want to continue to use the term, they should redefine the term and indicate that it is not the Chinese translation of "seismites".) the clastic injector is also polygenetic, and it is not necessarily seismic rock. The most important result of this symposium is that the situation of "almost one viewpoint" in the study of deformation structures and seismic rocks of soft sediments in China is beginning to be reversed. Showing the academic atmosphere of "a hundred flowers blossom and a hundred schools of thought contend".
【作者單位】: 中國石油大學(xué)(北京);
【分類號(hào)】:P542;P588.2
【參考文獻(xiàn)】
相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條
1 馮增昭;鮑志東;鄭秀娟;王媛;;中國軟沉積物變形構(gòu)造及地震巖研究簡(jiǎn)評(píng)[J];古地理學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期
2 馮增昭;;《地震巖問題》中譯本序[J];古地理學(xué)報(bào);2017年01期
3 山穆s,
本文編號(hào):1813815
本文鏈接:http://sikaile.net/kejilunwen/diqiudizhi/1813815.html
最近更新
教材專著