本文關(guān)鍵詞： 鐳同位素 海底地下水排泄 海底地下淡水排泄 營(yíng)養(yǎng)鹽 渦動(dòng)擴(kuò)散系數(shù) 大亞灣　出處：《中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：海底地下水排泄(SGD)是地下水與海水交換的研究重點(diǎn),它包括了兩個(gè)部分,一部分是海底地下淡水排泄(SFGD),另一部分是再循環(huán)海水(RSGD)。作為水循環(huán)的重要組成部分,SGD是陸地輸入海洋化學(xué)物質(zhì)的重要通道之一,同時(shí)也是各種污染物質(zhì)輸入到海水中的一個(gè)隱蔽通道。近年來,已經(jīng)有許多的報(bào)道證明了由SGD驅(qū)動(dòng)的物質(zhì)通量是不可被忽視的。本文以未被研究過SGD的大亞灣為研究對(duì)象,采集并分析了大亞灣區(qū)域的鐳同位素?cái)?shù)據(jù),發(fā)現(xiàn)鐳同位素在海灣內(nèi)由東北部的子灣向西南灣口逐漸遞減�？紤]了河流和外海影響,利用鐳同位素對(duì)水體刷新時(shí)間進(jìn)行了估計(jì),得到的結(jié)果是13.41~18.85 d,并利用納潮量模型(結(jié)果是18.83 d)驗(yàn)證了鐳同位素的水體刷新時(shí)間估計(jì)。同時(shí),我們利用水體表觀年齡模型得出水體表觀年齡是:9.35~26.72。三者結(jié)果基本一致,相互得到驗(yàn)證。對(duì)于水體混合過程,我們根據(jù)~(224)Ra在海灣內(nèi)的分布狀況和一維~(224)Ra擴(kuò)散模型,計(jì)算了大亞灣內(nèi)的水平渦動(dòng)擴(kuò)散系數(shù),結(jié)果為(7.80~11.65)×10~6cm2/s。同時(shí),根據(jù)灣內(nèi)和灣口一個(gè)站點(diǎn)計(jì)算的垂直分布狀況,估算出垂直渦動(dòng)擴(kuò)散系數(shù)為(1.12~4.44)cm2/s。在估計(jì)水體刷新時(shí)間的基礎(chǔ)上,構(gòu)建了海灣內(nèi)的鐳同位素質(zhì)量平衡模型,估計(jì)出大亞灣內(nèi)SGD為(2.68~3.34)×10~7 m~3/d。通過耦合海灣內(nèi)水、鹽質(zhì)量平衡模型,估算出2015年7月大亞灣海底地下淡水排泄量為(3.98~7.12)×10~6 m~3/d。同時(shí)在年平均的意義上建立了穩(wěn)態(tài)區(qū)域水均衡模型,估算出海底地下淡水排泄為(1.23~2.41)×10~6m~3/d或(0.22~0.43)cm/d。兩個(gè)不同模型得出的海底地下淡水排泄量非常接近,結(jié)果得到相互驗(yàn)證。估算了由SGD輸入到海灣的營(yíng)養(yǎng)鹽與重金屬物質(zhì)通量。結(jié)果顯示由SGD輸入到海灣的重金屬通量明顯大于河水輸入,SGD驅(qū)動(dòng)的營(yíng)養(yǎng)鹽通量與河流輸入通量相當(dāng)。確定了SGD攜帶化學(xué)物質(zhì)入海中所起的重要作用,在對(duì)海灣生態(tài)系統(tǒng)的研究中必須考慮SGD的影響。
[Abstract]:Submarine groundwater discharge (SGD) is the focus of research on the exchange of groundwater and seawater, which consists of two parts. One is the discharge of underwater fresh water, the other is the recycling of sea water, RSGD. As an important part of the water cycle, SGD is one of the important channels for terrestrial input of marine chemicals. In recent years, there have been many reports that the matter flux driven by SGD can not be ignored. In this paper, Daya Bay, which has not been studied on SGD, has been studied. The radium isotopic data in the Daya Bay area are collected and analyzed. It is found that the radium isotopes gradually decrease from Ziwan in the northeast to the mouth of the southwest bay in the Gulf. Considering the influence of rivers and the open sea, the refresh time of water body is estimated by using radium isotopes. The result obtained is 13.41 ~ 18.85 days, and the water refresh time estimate of radium isotope is verified by the model of tidal absorption (18.83 days). At the same time, the apparent age of water body is: 9.35 ~ 26.72 by using the water body apparent age model. The results are basically consistent with each other. For the mixing process of water body, we calculate the horizontal eddy diffusion coefficient in Daya Bay according to the distribution situation of Gui 224Ra in the bay and the one-dimensional diffusion model. The results show that the diffusion coefficient is 7.80 ~ 11.65) 脳 10 ~ (6) cm ~ (2 / s) 路s ~ (-1). At the same time, the horizontal vortex diffusion coefficient in Daya Bay is calculated. According to the vertical distribution calculated at a station in the bay and the mouth of the bay, the vertical eddy diffusion coefficient is estimated to be 1.124.44 cm ~ 2 / s. Based on the estimation of the water refresh time, a radium isotope mass balance model is established in the bay. The SGD in Daya Bay is estimated to be 2.68 ~ 3.34) 脳 10 ~ (7) m ~ (-1) 路d ~ (3 / d). By coupling the mass balance model of water and salt in the bay, it is estimated that in July 2015 the amount of underground fresh water discharged from the bottom of Daya Bay is 3.987.12) 脳 10 ~ (6) m ~ (3 / d) d. At the same time, a steady regional water balance model is established in the sense of annual average. It is estimated that the subsea freshwater discharge is 1.23 ~ 2.41) 脳 10 ~ (6) m ~ (-1) / d or 0.22 ~ 0.43 cm / d 路d. The two different models are very close to each other. The results show that the flux of nutrients and heavy metals from SGD to the bay is obviously larger than that from the river to the bay, and the flux of nutrient and heavy metal from the river to the bay is higher than that from the river. The flux is equivalent. The important role that SGD plays in carrying chemicals into the sea is determined. The effects of SGD must be considered in the study of the Gulf ecosystem.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)(北京)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：P734;X820;P641

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 凌備備;;海水水平渦動(dòng)擴(kuò)散的半經(jīng)驗(yàn)理論模型[J];船工科技;1977年02期

2 季仲?gòu)?qiáng);翁煥新;張鋒;陳力琦;張志奇;;海底地下水排泄及其對(duì)沿海海域生態(tài)環(huán)境的潛在影響[J];浙江大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(理學(xué)版);2010年05期

3 郭占榮;黃磊;劉花臺(tái);袁曉婕;;鐳同位素示蹤隆教灣的海底地下水排泄[J];地球?qū)W報(bào);2008年05期

4 門武;劉廣山;陳敏;黃奕普;;中國(guó)東海的~(224)Ra[J];地球科學(xué)(中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2011年06期

5 劉花臺(tái);郭占榮;袁曉婕;李開培;章斌;;用鐳同位素評(píng)價(jià)海水滯留時(shí)間及海底地下水排泄[J];地球科學(xué)(中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年03期

6 劉花臺(tái);郭占榮;;海底地下水排泄的研究進(jìn)展[J];地球科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2014年07期

7 黃奕普,姜德盛,徐茂泉,陳敏,邱雨生;南海東北部表層水體水平渦動(dòng)擴(kuò)散的~(228)Ra示蹤研究[J];熱帶海洋;1997年02期

8 張帥;;海底地下水排泄(SGD)的研究進(jìn)展及其環(huán)境意義[J];科協(xié)論壇(下半月);2011年02期

9 郭占榮;馬志勇;章斌;袁曉婕;劉花臺(tái);劉潔;;采用~(222)Rn示蹤膠州灣的海底地下水排泄及營(yíng)養(yǎng)鹽輸入[J];地球科學(xué)(中國(guó)地質(zhì)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào));2013年05期

10 郭巧娜;李海龍;;濱海深部含水層地下水排泄量評(píng)估[J];人民長(zhǎng)江;2010年08期

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前1條

1 馬志靖;;黃河三角洲地區(qū)淺層地下淡水資源開發(fā)及供水前景研究[A];中國(guó)地質(zhì)科學(xué)院“九五”科技成果匯編[C];2001年

相關(guān)重要報(bào)紙文章 前4條

1 夏s，

本文編號(hào)：1494117