本文選題：RTDP + MSG��； 參考：《原子能科學(xué)技術(shù)》2017年11期

【摘要】：偏離泡核沸騰比(DNBR)設(shè)計(jì)限值是反應(yīng)堆安全分析的基礎(chǔ),合理的計(jì)算方法有助于發(fā)掘更多的安全裕量。本文對(duì)比分析了核電站設(shè)計(jì)中常采用的RTDP和MSG方法,介紹了方法原理和計(jì)算流程,并以廣東嶺澳一期核電站為例,分別進(jìn)行了DNBR設(shè)計(jì)限值計(jì)算。結(jié)果表明:雖然兩種方法的原理不同,但在相同的工況和統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)輸入?yún)?shù)條件下,DNBR設(shè)計(jì)限值相近,設(shè)計(jì)中可根據(jù)具體應(yīng)用需求進(jìn)行選擇。
[Abstract]:Deviating from the design limit of bubble boiling ratio (DNBR) is the basis of reactor safety analysis. A reasonable calculation method is helpful to excavate more safety margin. In this paper, the RTDP and MSG methods commonly used in the design of nuclear power station are compared and analyzed. The principle and calculation flow of the method are introduced. Taking Lingao Phase I Nuclear Power Station in Guangdong Province as an example, the design limit of DNBR is calculated respectively. The results show that although the principles of the two methods are different, the design limits of DNBR are similar under the same operating conditions and statistical input parameters, and the design can be selected according to the specific application requirements.
【作者單位】： 核反應(yīng)堆系統(tǒng)設(shè)計(jì)技術(shù)重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室;中國(guó)核動(dòng)力研究設(shè)計(jì)院;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TM623

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 劉一哲;喻宏;;快堆電站熱工流體力學(xué)設(shè)計(jì)限值的探討[J];中國(guó)原子能科學(xué)研究院年報(bào);2007年00期

2 鄧文輝;李先杰;周炬;王廷學(xué);胡鵬華;王爾奇;;鈾礦井采場(chǎng)氡子體α潛能濃度設(shè)計(jì)限值的確定[J];鈾礦冶;2009年03期

3 攸國(guó)順;鄭繼業(yè);;環(huán)狀燃料堆物理特性及安全性簡(jiǎn)介[J];中國(guó)科技信息;2012年18期

4 于俊崇;脈沖堆熱工水力設(shè)計(jì)[J];核動(dòng)力工程;1991年01期

5 楊萍;賈紅軼;王U，

本文編號(hào)：1791819