本文選題：投入產(chǎn)出　切入點(diǎn)：復(fù)雜網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論　出處：《江蘇大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：為了應(yīng)對全球氣候變化,大幅度減少化石能源消費(fèi)及相應(yīng)的碳排放,國際社會制定了許多能源和環(huán)境政策。然而,全球區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)的發(fā)展存在著差異性,目前能源和環(huán)境方案的制定缺乏對全球區(qū)域經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展差異的考慮,無法兼顧節(jié)能減排的公平與效率,因此,識別各區(qū)域碳流動的關(guān)鍵部門對于制定科學(xué)的能源和環(huán)境方案,對實(shí)現(xiàn)節(jié)能環(huán)保目標(biāo)以及兼顧節(jié)能減排的公平與效率具有重要的意義。電力行業(yè)是碳排放和碳減排的重要領(lǐng)域之一,以中國為例,電力行業(yè)是中國碳排放的重要來源,對其征收碳稅是實(shí)現(xiàn)節(jié)能減排目標(biāo)的有效政策手段。然而對電力行業(yè)征收碳稅必然會影響電力市場的穩(wěn)定,因此有必要分析碳稅對電力市場的影響。本文基于全球多區(qū)域投入產(chǎn)出表,結(jié)合復(fù)雜網(wǎng)絡(luò)理論,構(gòu)建了包含七大區(qū)域及35個產(chǎn)業(yè)部門的CO_2間接流動網(wǎng)絡(luò)模型,分析了1999年、2004年和2009年六大區(qū)域的碳強(qiáng)度變化,發(fā)現(xiàn)隨著時間的變化,中國的碳強(qiáng)度在6個區(qū)域中一直處于最高地位。其次,根據(jù)復(fù)雜網(wǎng)絡(luò)中三個重要的指標(biāo),即度與度分布、聚類系數(shù)以及介數(shù)中心性,確定了CO_2間接流動的關(guān)鍵部門,討論了可能的能源及環(huán)境政策建議。通過分析復(fù)雜網(wǎng)絡(luò)中三個重要的指標(biāo),發(fā)現(xiàn)本文的三個網(wǎng)絡(luò)在一定范圍內(nèi)服從冪律分布,即少部分的部門排放了大部分的CO_2,而大部分的部門排放了少部分的CO_2。其中,電力天然氣及水供應(yīng)業(yè)、交通運(yùn)輸業(yè)以及金屬礦產(chǎn)業(yè)是各個區(qū)域中CO_2間接排放量較大的部門,應(yīng)該對這些部門嚴(yán)格監(jiān)控以減少其碳排放。為了研究碳稅對電力市場的影響,本文通過建立電力生產(chǎn)博弈模型,分析了三寡頭壟斷下的電力生產(chǎn)模型中發(fā)電商電力產(chǎn)量調(diào)整速度、政府允許的最高電價以及與碳稅系數(shù)這三個因素對電力市場的影響。經(jīng)過研究發(fā)現(xiàn),當(dāng)發(fā)電商發(fā)電產(chǎn)量調(diào)整過快、政府允許的最高電價過高或者政府征收的碳稅系數(shù)過大或過小時,都容易影響電力市場的穩(wěn)定。為了避免電力市場陷入混沌狀態(tài),發(fā)電商以及政府應(yīng)該根據(jù)實(shí)際情況制定合理有效的措施,將碳稅控制在合適的范圍。
[Abstract]:In order to cope with global climate change and greatly reduce the consumption of fossil energy and the corresponding carbon emissions, the international community has formulated many energy and environmental policies. However, there are differences in the development of global regional economy. The current development of energy and environment programmes lacks consideration of the differences in global regional economic development and does not balance equity and efficiency in energy conservation and emission reduction, and therefore the identification of key sectors of carbon flows across regions contributes to the development of scientific energy and environmental programmes, The electric power industry is one of the important fields of carbon emission and carbon emission reduction. Taking China as an example, the power industry is an important source of carbon emissions in China. The imposition of carbon tax is an effective policy means to achieve the goal of energy saving and emission reduction. However, the imposition of carbon tax on the electricity industry will inevitably affect the stability of the electricity market. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the impact of carbon tax on the electricity market. Based on the global multi-region input-output table and the complex network theory, this paper constructs the CO_2 indirect flow network model, which includes seven regions and 35 industrial sectors. In 1999, 2004 and 2009, the changes of carbon intensity in six major regions are analyzed. It is found that the carbon intensity of China has been in the highest position among the six regions with the change of time. Secondly, according to the distribution of degree and degree, three important indexes in the complex network, the degree and degree distribution, are analyzed. The key sectors of indirect flow of CO_2 are identified, and possible energy and environmental policy recommendations are discussed. Three important indicators in complex networks are analyzed. It is found that the three networks in this paper are distributed according to the power law within a certain range, that is, a small number of departments discharge most of the COD 2, and most of the departments discharge a small part of the CO 2. Among them, the electricity, natural gas and water supply industry, Transportation and the metal mining industry are the major sectors of indirect CO_2 emissions in various regions, and these sectors should be strictly monitored to reduce their carbon emissions, in order to study the impact of the carbon tax on the electricity market. By establishing a game model of electric power production, this paper analyzes the speed of power output adjustment in the electricity production model under the monopoly of three oligarchs. The effects of three factors, the maximum electricity price allowed by the government and the carbon tax coefficient, on the electricity market. The high maximum electricity price allowed by the government or the excessive or excessive carbon tax coefficient imposed by the government can easily affect the stability of the electricity market. Electricity producers and governments should work out reasonable and effective measures to keep the carbon tax within the appropriate range.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：江蘇大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F426.61;O157.5

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前9條

1 彭興釗;姚宏;丁超;張志浩;;變聚類系數(shù)加權(quán)網(wǎng)絡(luò)的建模及其級聯(lián)抗毀性分析[J];系統(tǒng)工程與電子技術(shù);2014年12期

2 王韶華;于維洋;;一次能源消費(fèi)結(jié)構(gòu)變動對碳強(qiáng)度影響的靈敏度分析[J];資源科學(xué);2013年07期

3 楊騫;劉華軍;;中國碳強(qiáng)度分布的地區(qū)差異與收斂性——基于1995-2009年省際數(shù)據(jù)的實(shí)證研究[J];當(dāng)代財(cái)經(jīng);2012年02期

4 彭水軍;張文城;;國際碳減排合作公平性問題研究[J];廈門大學(xué)學(xué)報(哲學(xué)社會科學(xué)版);2012年01期

5 卞家濤;余珊萍;;碳減排問題研究綜述與展望[J];華南理工大學(xué)學(xué)報(社會科學(xué)版);2011年05期

6 馬述忠;陳穎;;進(jìn)出口貿(mào)易對中國隱含碳排放量的影響:2000-2009年——基于國內(nèi)消費(fèi)視角的單區(qū)域投入產(chǎn)出模型分析[J];財(cái)貿(mào)經(jīng)濟(jì);2010年12期

7 李清清;周建中;莫莉;羅志猛;張勇傳;;基于通用博弈模型的電力市場均衡對比分析[J];電網(wǎng)技術(shù);2010年07期

8 陳皓勇;付超;劉陽;王錫凡;;寡頭壟斷電力市場實(shí)驗(yàn)設(shè)計(jì)與博弈分析[J];電力系統(tǒng)自動化;2006年19期

9 李國琛;全球氣候變暖成因分析[J];自然災(zāi)害學(xué)報;2005年05期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 史亞東;全球碳減排責(zé)任分擔(dān)機(jī)制與氣候政策研究[D];南開大學(xué);2012年

2 朱謙;全球溫室氣體減排的清潔發(fā)展機(jī)制研究[D];蘇州大學(xué);2006年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 王姝姝;中國制造業(yè)出口隱含碳排放的測度與影響因素研究[D];東北財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué);2015年

2 高贏;國際貿(mào)易隱含碳研究[D];山東大學(xué);2013年

，

本文編號：1577887