【摘要】：在U形切槽梁雙參數(shù)測(cè)試法理論推導(dǎo)基礎(chǔ)上,試驗(yàn)了21個(gè)大理巖U形切槽梁試樣,用雙參數(shù)法確定其拉伸強(qiáng)度和斷裂韌度.為了保證測(cè)試結(jié)果的有效性,在斷裂后的半截U形切槽梁上鉆取了8個(gè)巴西圓盤(pán)試樣和7個(gè)人字形切槽巴西圓盤(pán)試樣,分別單獨(dú)測(cè)試其拉伸強(qiáng)度和斷裂韌度.不同方法測(cè)試結(jié)果比較表明:由U形切槽梁雙參數(shù)測(cè)試法得到的拉伸強(qiáng)度和斷裂韌度分別與用巴西圓盤(pán)試樣測(cè)得的拉伸強(qiáng)度和用人字形切槽巴西圓盤(pán)試樣測(cè)得的斷裂韌度接近.用Gómez有關(guān)文獻(xiàn)中PMMA材料的U形切槽梁實(shí)驗(yàn)數(shù)據(jù)進(jìn)行分析,再次證實(shí)了U形切槽梁雙參數(shù)測(cè)試法的有效性.
[Abstract]:On the basis of the theoretical derivation of the two-parameter test method for U-cut beam, 21 specimens of U-cut beam of marble were tested, and the tensile strength and fracture toughness of the specimens were determined by two-parameter method. In order to ensure the validity of the test results, 8 Brazilian disk specimens and 7 individual zigzag notched Brazilian disk specimens were drilled on the half-cut U-shaped notched beam after fracture. The tensile strength and fracture toughness of the specimens were measured separately. The results of different test methods show that the tensile strength and fracture toughness obtained from the double parameter test of U-shaped notched beam are close to those obtained from the Brazilian disc specimen and the human zigzag cut groove Brazilian disc specimen, respectively.The results show that the tensile strength and fracture toughness obtained by the two-parameter test method are similar to those obtained from the Brazilian circular disk specimen with the zigzag groove. By using the experimental data of PMMA material in G 貿(mào) mez's literature, the validity of the two-parameter test method of U-shaped notched beam is proved again.
【作者單位】： 重慶交通大學(xué)山區(qū)橋梁與隧道工程國(guó)家重點(diǎn)實(shí)驗(yàn)室培育基地;重慶交通大學(xué)土木工程學(xué)院;四川大學(xué)土木工程及應(yīng)用力學(xué)系;
【分類(lèi)號(hào)】：TB301;;TB302.1

【相似文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)會(huì)議論文 前10條

1 徐志強(qiáng);黎立云;付小明;毛紅川;李凌霄;王榮新;韓智超;;鋼的Ⅲ型裂紋斷裂韌度測(cè)試研究[A];北京力學(xué)會(huì)第18屆學(xué)術(shù)年會(huì)論文集[C];2012年

2 馮義輝;張?zhí)┤A;郇勇;;納米壓入識(shí)別脆性材料斷裂韌度的新方法[A];2010年海峽兩岸材料破壞/斷裂學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議暨第十屆破壞科學(xué)研討會(huì)/第八屆全國(guó)MTS材料試驗(yàn)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2010年

3 曹侃;汪洋;夏源明;;環(huán)氧樹(shù)脂純Ⅰ型和純Ⅱ型斷裂韌度的實(shí)驗(yàn)研究[A];第十五屆全國(guó)復(fù)合材料學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集（下冊(cè)）[C];2008年

4 高怡斐;劉濤;張海龍;欒培鋒;;金屬材料斷裂韌度試驗(yàn)方法新舊國(guó)標(biāo)與相關(guān)國(guó)外標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的比較[A];中國(guó)力學(xué)學(xué)會(huì)學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)'2009論文摘要集[C];2009年

5 安兵兵;張東升;;皮質(zhì)骨的斷裂韌度測(cè)試技術(shù)研究[A];第十二屆全國(guó)實(shí)驗(yàn)力學(xué)學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文摘要集[C];2009年

6 丁富連;李陳;;單試樣卸載柔度法測(cè)定金屬材料斷裂韌度[A];第十四屆全國(guó)疲勞與斷裂學(xué)術(shù)會(huì)議論文集[C];2008年

7 鄧傳斌;李蘋(píng);吳澤志;;復(fù)合材料斷裂韌度G_(ⅡC)的實(shí)驗(yàn)測(cè)定[A];“力學(xué)2000”學(xué)術(shù)大會(huì)論文集[C];2000年

8 邱保文;李榮鋒;Q糜，

本文編號(hào)：2309046