【摘要】：隨著科技的發(fā)展和生產(chǎn)活動(dòng)的日益復(fù)雜化，為了提高安全管理水平，結(jié)合相關(guān)先進(jìn)技術(shù)和理論進(jìn)行安全管理工作顯得越來越重要了。安全績效測(cè)量作為安全管理工作效果的體現(xiàn)，是安全管理工作重要內(nèi)容。國內(nèi)外對(duì)安全績效的研究已經(jīng)逐步走向成熟了，，提出了很多績效指標(biāo)體系。安全績效指標(biāo)作為安全績效的載體，也是安全績效研究的重要內(nèi)容。它的科學(xué)與否關(guān)心著安全績效的測(cè)量的客觀性和公正性。但是目前針對(duì)安全績效指標(biāo)有效性的測(cè)評(píng)研究還比較少，因此有必要對(duì)安全績效指標(biāo)有效性的測(cè)評(píng)方法進(jìn)行深入的探索和研究。 本文通過對(duì)相關(guān)多維度指標(biāo)體系的測(cè)評(píng)方法進(jìn)行分析和研究，發(fā)現(xiàn)數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法在進(jìn)行多指標(biāo)系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)中可以最大限度避免人們主觀因素的影響，具有較強(qiáng)的客觀性和公正性。所以本文試圖采用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法對(duì)安全績效指標(biāo)的有效性進(jìn)行測(cè)評(píng)。本文首先對(duì)前人提出的安全績效指標(biāo)體系進(jìn)行歸納和總結(jié)，結(jié)合自己對(duì)安全管理的理解，提出了一般的安全績效指標(biāo)體系。然后本文對(duì)這些績效指標(biāo)采用相關(guān)指標(biāo)量化方法進(jìn)行了量化，使得的量化的數(shù)據(jù)能夠客觀地反應(yīng)該指標(biāo)的工作內(nèi)容，并盡量使量化具有可操作性。結(jié)合數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法的相關(guān)要求，本文根據(jù)輸入指標(biāo)和輸出指標(biāo)的定義，以及安全管理工作的目的及意義，將所獲取的安全績效量化指標(biāo)劃分為輸入指標(biāo)和輸出指標(biāo)兩類。然后本文試圖采用數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法，從安全工作效率的角度對(duì)安全績效進(jìn)行初步測(cè)量。本文以數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析結(jié)果為基礎(chǔ)，采取“指標(biāo)剔除法”，對(duì)這些安全績效指標(biāo)的有效性進(jìn)行分析。 最后，本文為了驗(yàn)證所述研究方法的可行性而進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析和研究。本文以2006年-2011年特種設(shè)備安全管理工作為研究對(duì)象，以描述其管理績效的典型指標(biāo)為基礎(chǔ)，對(duì)這些年份的安全績效采用了數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法進(jìn)行了初步測(cè)評(píng)，并對(duì)安全管理績效不佳的年份的安全管理工作提出了一些改進(jìn)的參考意見。初評(píng)工作結(jié)束后，本文采用指標(biāo)剔除法對(duì)這些反應(yīng)特種設(shè)備安全管理工作狀況的典型指標(biāo)的有效性進(jìn)行了測(cè)評(píng)，并對(duì)這些績效指標(biāo)的權(quán)重關(guān)系進(jìn)行了分析。通過分析發(fā)現(xiàn)，目前所采用這些績效指標(biāo)均是客觀有效。 本文通過理論研究和實(shí)例分析驗(yàn)證了數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)法測(cè)評(píng)安全績效指標(biāo)有效性的客觀性和可行性，取得了一定的研究成果。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology and the increasing complication of production activities, in order to improve the level of safety management, it is more and more important to combine the relevant advanced technology and theory to carry out safety management. As the embodiment of safety management effect, safety performance measurement is an important part of safety management. The research on safety performance at home and abroad has gradually matured and put forward a lot of performance index system. As the carrier of safety performance, safety performance index is also an important content of safety performance research. Whether it is scientific or not concerns the objectivity and impartiality of the measurement of safety performance. However, there are few researches on the effectiveness of safety performance indicators, so it is necessary to explore and study the methods of evaluating the effectiveness of safety performance indicators. Through the analysis and research on the evaluation method of the related multi-dimensional index system, it is found that the data envelopment method can avoid the influence of subjective factors to the maximum extent in the evaluation of multi-index system, and has strong objectivity and impartiality. Therefore, this paper attempts to use the data envelope method to evaluate the effectiveness of security performance indicators. Firstly, this paper summarizes and summarizes the safety performance index system put forward by predecessors, and puts forward a general safety performance index system combined with its own understanding of safety management. Then this paper quantifies these performance indicators by using the quantitative method of relevant indicators, which makes the quantitative data can objectively reflect the work content of the index, and make the quantization operational as far as possible. According to the definition of input index and output index, as well as the purpose and significance of safety management, the quantitative index of safety performance is divided into two categories: input index and output index. Then this paper attempts to use the data envelope method to measure the safety performance from the perspective of safety efficiency. Based on the results of data envelopment analysis, this paper analyzes the effectiveness of these safety performance indicators by using "index elimination method". Finally, in order to verify the feasibility of the research method, this paper carried out empirical analysis and research. Taking the work of safety management of special equipment from 2006 to 2011 as the research object, and based on the typical indicators to describe its management performance, this paper uses the data envelopment method to evaluate the safety performance of these years. Some suggestions for improving safety management in years with poor safety management performance are put forward. After the initial evaluation, the effectiveness of these typical indicators of safety management of special equipment is evaluated by the method of index elimination, and the weight relationship of these performance indicators is analyzed. Through analysis, it is found that these performance indicators are objective and effective. This paper verifies the objectivity and feasibility of the data envelopment method in evaluating the effectiveness of safety performance indicators through theoretical research and case analysis, and some research results have been obtained.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：X92

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 魏權(quán)齡,李宏余;決策單元的變更對(duì)DEA有效性的影響[J];北京航空航天大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1991年01期

2 李美娟,陳國宏;數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法(DEA)的研究與應(yīng)用[J];中國工程科學(xué);2003年06期

3 溫賀;陳全;陳波;;OHSMS績效評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)權(quán)重確定的研究[J];工業(yè)安全與環(huán)保;2012年11期

4 王永剛;王一葦;;基于風(fēng)險(xiǎn)管理的機(jī)場安全目標(biāo)分解研究[J];安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào);2012年06期

5 黃浩;羅廣福;黃仕斌;;個(gè)體防護(hù)裝備在職業(yè)病危害預(yù)防中的應(yīng)用[J];安全生產(chǎn)與監(jiān)督;2012年03期

6 劉星;;解析安全生產(chǎn)方針新內(nèi)涵,推進(jìn)安全生產(chǎn)綜合治理進(jìn)程[J];華北科技學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2009年02期

7 袁群;;數(shù)據(jù)包絡(luò)分析法應(yīng)用研究綜述[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)研究導(dǎo)刊;2009年19期

8 李宏鵬;;安全培訓(xùn)教育要注重實(shí)效性[J];金屬世界;2012年02期

9 張華;呂濤;;基于DEA及其改進(jìn)模型的我國煤炭企業(yè)安全效率評(píng)價(jià)[J];煤炭經(jīng)濟(jì)研究;2011年05期

10 李效軍;;基于煤礦事故因果追蹤分析的研究[J];煤炭技術(shù);2006年01期

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前2條

1 高明;基于MORT的安全績效評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2011年

2 張旭鳳;企業(yè)生產(chǎn)安全績效指標(biāo)體系及其在供電企業(yè)測(cè)量應(yīng)用研究[D];中國地質(zhì)大學(xué)（北京）;2010年

本文編號(hào)：2318849