【摘要】：系統(tǒng)綜合評(píng)價(jià)是個(gè)十分復(fù)雜的問題,它涉及評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)象集、評(píng)級(jí)指標(biāo)集、評(píng)價(jià)方法集、評(píng)價(jià)人集,從而評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果也由包括但不限于的上述各種因素的組合所影響或決定。對(duì)一個(gè)復(fù)雜對(duì)象的評(píng)價(jià)能否準(zhǔn)確,不但受所遴選的專家群及描述被評(píng)價(jià)對(duì)象特征的指標(biāo)體系的影響,還受所選擇評(píng)價(jià)方法的影響。單一評(píng)價(jià)方法的應(yīng)用一定程度上解決系統(tǒng)評(píng)價(jià)問題并為決策提供了參考,但仍然存在各方面的缺點(diǎn)。因此,就要求我們要有系統(tǒng)觀念,運(yùn)用“集成法”幫助解決評(píng)價(jià)過程中出現(xiàn)的問題,在各個(gè)階段都比較科學(xué)合理開展的情況下才能最終評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果的可靠性。 當(dāng)前,人們已經(jīng)重視對(duì)綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法的創(chuàng)新與發(fā)展。從系統(tǒng)觀念出發(fā),分析系統(tǒng)特點(diǎn),采用“集成化”的方案,針對(duì)問題的不同側(cè)面應(yīng)用不同的理論或方法以發(fā)揮其優(yōu)勢(shì),是多指標(biāo)綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法發(fā)展的途徑之一。故本文就水上交通系統(tǒng)安全度集成化評(píng)價(jià)模型的構(gòu)建及應(yīng)用做了研究。 本文研究工作主要有以下幾個(gè)方面：第一章為研究背景及研究?jī)?nèi)容的介紹,并交代了本文的內(nèi)容架構(gòu)；第二章對(duì)水上交通安全評(píng)價(jià)常用理論與模型進(jìn)行了回顧與概括,如模糊理論與模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型、灰色理論與灰色聚類評(píng)價(jià)模型等,這些理論與模型可為采用“集成化”的評(píng)價(jià)方案提供借鑒。第三章為文章核心部分。首先概括介紹了集對(duì)分析理論及其聯(lián)系數(shù)概念,其次分析了構(gòu)建基于聯(lián)系數(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)的綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型的可行性,并建立了基于聯(lián)系數(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)的安全度綜合評(píng)價(jià)模型；再次,分析了評(píng)價(jià)模型中各組成模塊的含義并給出了其實(shí)現(xiàn)方法；最后,給出了“對(duì)立---統(tǒng)一”的評(píng)價(jià)結(jié)果形式。第四章以課題組項(xiàng)目為契機(jī),系統(tǒng)、深入、細(xì)致的分析了長(zhǎng)江尹公洲航段的通航環(huán)境特征；第五章確定了尹公洲航段安全度評(píng)價(jià)的指標(biāo)體系并引用了相應(yīng)的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn),構(gòu)建了指標(biāo)安全等級(jí)灰類的白化權(quán)函數(shù)；第六章是文章的重點(diǎn),主要運(yùn)用所建立的聯(lián)系數(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)的安全評(píng)價(jià)模型對(duì)尹公洲航段進(jìn)行了通航環(huán)境安全度量化綜合評(píng)價(jià)；第七章為研究結(jié)論與展望,對(duì)本文的研究?jī)?nèi)容、研究結(jié)果進(jìn)行了總結(jié),提出了論文的不足之處,并針對(duì)尚可以深入研究的方面提出了研究展望。
[Abstract]:Systematic comprehensive evaluation is a very complex problem, which involves the evaluation object set, rating index set, evaluation method set and evaluation person set. Therefore, the evaluation results are also influenced or determined by the combination of the above factors, which include but are not limited to. Whether the evaluation of a complex object is accurate or not is influenced not only by the selected expert group and the index system which describes the characteristics of the object to be evaluated, but also by the selected evaluation method. The application of single evaluation method solves the problem of system evaluation to a certain extent and provides a reference for decision making, but there are still shortcomings in all aspects. Therefore, we need to have a systematic concept, use "integrated method" to help solve the problems in the evaluation process, in each stage of scientific and reasonable development of the final evaluation results reliability. At present, people have attached importance to the innovation and development of comprehensive evaluation methods. Starting from the system concept, analyzing the characteristics of the system, adopting the scheme of "integration" and applying different theories or methods to the different sides of the problem in order to give play to its advantages, it is one of the ways to develop the multi-index comprehensive evaluation method. Therefore, the construction and application of the integrated evaluation model of water transportation system safety are studied in this paper. The main research work of this paper is as follows: the first chapter is the introduction of the research background and research content, and explains the content structure of this paper; In the second chapter, the common theories and models of water traffic safety evaluation are reviewed and summarized, such as fuzzy theory and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model, grey theory and grey cluster evaluation model, etc. These theories and models can be used for reference in the integrated evaluation scheme. The third chapter is the core part of the article. Firstly, the theory of set pair analysis and the concept of connection number are introduced. Secondly, the feasibility of constructing a comprehensive evaluation model based on connection number structure is analyzed, and a comprehensive evaluation model of safety degree based on connection number structure is established. Thirdly, the meaning of each component module in the evaluation model is analyzed and its implementation method is given. Finally, the evaluation result form of "opposition-unity" is given. The fourth chapter takes the project as the turning point, systematically, deeply, meticulously analyzes the navigation environment characteristic of the Yangtze River Yin Gongzhou section; In the fifth chapter, the index system of the safety degree evaluation of Yin Gongzhou section is determined and the corresponding evaluation standard is cited, and the whitening weight function of the grey class of the index safety grade is constructed. The sixth chapter is the focus of the article, mainly using the established safety evaluation model of connection number structure to evaluate the navigation environment safety degree of Yin Gongzhou section. The seventh chapter is the conclusion and prospect of the research. The research contents and results are summarized, the deficiencies of the paper are put forward, and the research prospect is put forward in view of the aspects that can be further studied.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：武漢理工大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2013
【分類號(hào)】：U698

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 邵哲平,吳兆麟,方祥麟,陳沈陽;基于模糊推理系統(tǒng)的操船環(huán)境危險(xiǎn)度的評(píng)價(jià)方法[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1999年04期

2 高巖松,吳兆麟;廈門港航道環(huán)境危險(xiǎn)度的分析與評(píng)價(jià)[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2001年01期

3 潘冰;;ISM規(guī)則的發(fā)展和趨勢(shì)(英文)[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2010年S1期

4 郭國平;田延飛;陳厚忠;;基于聯(lián)系數(shù)結(jié)構(gòu)的綜合量化評(píng)價(jià)模型建立及其應(yīng)用[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);2012年02期

5 鄭中義,吳兆麟,楊丹;港口船舶事故致因的灰色關(guān)聯(lián)分析模型[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1997年02期

6 馬會(huì),吳兆麟;港口航道水域操船環(huán)境危險(xiǎn)度的綜合評(píng)價(jià)[J];大連海事大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào);1998年03期

7 董奮義;肖美丹;劉斌;韓穎;;灰色系統(tǒng)教學(xué)中白化權(quán)函數(shù)的構(gòu)造方法分析[J];華北水利水電學(xué)院學(xué)報(bào);2010年03期

8 ;Formal safety assessment and application of the navigation simulators for preventing human error in ship operations[J];Journal of Marine Science and Application;2005年03期

9 潘家財(cái);邵哲平;;基于模糊綜合和模糊推理的適應(yīng)性評(píng)價(jià)[J];集美大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)(自然科學(xué)版);2007年02期

10 蔣云良;徐從富;;集對(duì)分析理論及其應(yīng)用研究進(jìn)展[J];計(jì)算機(jī)科學(xué);2006年01期

相關(guān)博士學(xué)位論文 前1條

1 陳厚忠;三峽壩區(qū)水上交通系統(tǒng)安全性研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2011年

相關(guān)碩士學(xué)位論文 前10條

1 賴強(qiáng);水域危險(xiǎn)度的灰色評(píng)價(jià)及其在廣州港的應(yīng)用[D];大連海事大學(xué);2002年

2 邱健華;長(zhǎng)江水上交通安全狀況綜合評(píng)價(jià)方法[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2003年

3 高衛(wèi)東;長(zhǎng)江尹公洲水域全方位立體監(jiān)控船舶交通管理模式研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2003年

4 王新全;船舶設(shè)備安全評(píng)估標(biāo)準(zhǔn)與系統(tǒng)研制[D];上海海事大學(xué);2005年

5 張鵬;航道水域船舶航行環(huán)境危險(xiǎn)度的評(píng)價(jià)[D];大連海事大學(xué);2007年

6 王紅兵;長(zhǎng)江鎮(zhèn)江段尹公洲航段單船通過能力研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2008年

7 徐娜;高速公路機(jī)電系統(tǒng)安全運(yùn)行管理及其評(píng)價(jià)研究[D];長(zhǎng)安大學(xué);2009年

8 張蕾;長(zhǎng)江干線典型航道通過能力仿真研究[D];武漢理工大學(xué);2009年

9 李波;天津港復(fù)式航道通航安全的灰色模糊預(yù)評(píng)價(jià)[D];大連海事大學(xué);2010年

10 史玉婷;重慶市危險(xiǎn)品內(nèi)河運(yùn)輸非事故性安全評(píng)價(jià)方法研究[D];重慶交通大學(xué);2010年

，

本文編號(hào)：2309631