本文選題：安全管理工程 + 事故致因“-”模型��； 參考：《安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào)》2017年03期

【摘要】：根據(jù)事故致因"2-4"模型,人的不安全動(dòng)作與物的不安全狀態(tài)是事故發(fā)生的直接原因,但國內(nèi)外學(xué)者關(guān)于二者的判定方法并未形成共識。為了尋找不安全動(dòng)作與不安全物態(tài)科學(xué)的判定方法,首先,通過文獻(xiàn)研究,綜述了國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對不安全動(dòng)作、不安全物態(tài)的分類及定義;其次,從理論層面論述了不安全動(dòng)作、不安全物態(tài)的判定方法;最后,以一起重大瓦斯爆炸事故為例對不安全動(dòng)作及不安全物態(tài)的判定方法進(jìn)行實(shí)證分析。結(jié)果表明,基于事故致因"2-4"模型的不安全動(dòng)作和不安全物態(tài)判定方法有效。
[Abstract]:According to the "2-4" model of the cause of accidents, the unsafe behavior of human beings and the unsafe state of objects are the direct causes of accidents, but there is no consensus between domestic and foreign scholars on the methods of judging them. In order to find the method of judging unsafe action and unsafe physical state, firstly, through literature research, this paper summarizes the classification and definition of unsafe action and unsafe object state by domestic and foreign scholars, and then discusses unsafe action from the theoretical level. Finally, taking a major gas explosion accident as an example, the method of judging unsafe action and unsafe physical state is analyzed empirically. The results show that the method based on the "2-4" model is effective.
【作者單位】： 中國礦業(yè)大學(xué)(北京)資源與安全工程學(xué)院;
【基金】：國家自然科學(xué)基金項(xiàng)目(51534008)
【分類號】：X928
，

本文編號：1834282