本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于區(qū)間數(shù)AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理綜合評(píng)價(jià)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。

基于區(qū)間數(shù)AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理綜合評(píng)價(jià)

作者：1”的相關(guān)文章'>易欣1 ”的相關(guān)文章'>2  1”的相關(guān)文章'>張飛漣1  1”的相關(guān)文章'>邱慧1 

單位：1. 中南大學(xué)土木工程學(xué)院,長(zhǎng)沙 410075;
2. 華東交通大學(xué)土木建筑學(xué)院,南昌 330013

關(guān)鍵詞：安全管理工程 區(qū)間數(shù)AHP Vague集 安全綜合評(píng)價(jià) 施工現(xiàn)場(chǎng) 

分類號(hào)：X948; TU714

出版年·卷·期（頁(yè)碼）：2012··第4期（229-233）

摘要：

施工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)安全分析中存在模糊性和難以分辨性的問題。根據(jù)相關(guān)法律、法規(guī)和規(guī)范,首先從安全生產(chǎn)管理制度、安全教育與宣傳、安全生產(chǎn)、安全管理組織機(jī)構(gòu)、勞動(dòng)保護(hù)等方面構(gòu)建了施工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)安全管理的評(píng)價(jià)指標(biāo)體系,然后使用區(qū)間數(shù)AHP給各指標(biāo)賦權(quán); 再基于Vague集理論建立了施工現(xiàn)場(chǎng)安全的改進(jìn)模糊綜合評(píng)價(jià)數(shù)學(xué)模型;最后進(jìn)行了實(shí)證分析。結(jié)果表明該方法能夠反映工地的現(xiàn)場(chǎng)安全管理情況。

The given paper takes it as its mission to develop a safety comprehensive evaluation method to change the passive accidents-prevention situation into an active guard-against strategy. As we know, in the construction site safety analysis field,there always exist ambiguity or uncertainty against production safety and security and the necessity to pursue appropriate measures to guarantee the problem of safe production. To solve such a problem, the present paper intends to establish an evaluation index system for the construction site safety management. Based on the study of the relevant laws,rules and production regulations, first of all, we have got to know that all the following indices are of primary importance: the safety operation regulations and standards, safety education and publicity, safety construction and safety management organization, labor protection and safeguard, etc. Secondly, to make sure all the above mentioned indices’ weights in proper place in accordance with the production demands, it would be necessary to introduce the interval Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) into our study. In comparison with the traditional Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), we have put forward an improved weight-providing means, which can, to some extent, settle the uncertain problem of expert’s judgment for such an expert’s judgment cannot provide a hundred-per-cent assurance. Thirdly, based on the fuzzy sets theory, we have set up a melioration fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model for construction site safety control. Since the fuzzy sets theory is dynamic and characteristic of full-scale information, which can help to better reflect the above said indices. And, finally, corresponding empirical analysis should also be prudently included so as to justify the theory concerned. Thus, it is always necessary to make a more all-around comprehensive conclusion based on the common fuzzy evaluation problems based on the fuzzy sets theory. The results of our investigation prove that the method developed by us can accurately and effectively reflect the objective situation demands for safety control of the construction site, on the condition that precautions and preventive measures should be set out in case any accidents may take place.

參考文獻(xiàn)：

[1] LAI Yongbao(來(lái)永寶). Innovation: enterprise safety culture[J]. Journal of Jiaying University(嘉應(yīng)大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)), 2003, 21(4): 33-35.
[2] TIAN Yuanfu(田元福), LI Huimin(李慧民). Current status and ponder over the management in construction safety[J]. China Safety Science Journal(中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)), 2003, 13(12): 13-16.
[3] LEVITT R E, PARKER H W. Reducing construction accident top management's role[J]. Journal of construction Division, 1976, 102(3): 465-478.
[4] HINZE J, PANNULLO J. Safety function of job control[J]. Journal of Construction Division, 1978, 104(2): 241-249.
[5] HINZE J, RABOUD P. Safety on large building construction projects[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 1988, 114(2): 286-293.
[6] ZHANG Shu(張舒), SHI Xiuzhi(史秀志), HUANG Ganghai(黃剛海). Choosing the best scheme of safety management system based on AHP and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào)), 2010, 10(6): 221-226.
[7] HUA Yan(華燕), WANG Jizhi(王際芝), WANG Dong(汪東). What kind of safety management does the construction enterprise need[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal(土木工程學(xué)報(bào)), 2003, 36(3): 79-83.
[8] LIN Cheng(林成). Application of pre-alarm safety management technique in construction[J]. Construction Technology(施工技術(shù)), 2006, 35(5): 31 34.
[9] PAN Jing(潘婧), JIANG Juncheng(蔣軍成). Risk evaluation of long distance pipelines basedon grey relevance theory and entropy-weighted method[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment(安全與環(huán)境學(xué)報(bào)), 2010, 10(5): 201-203.
[10] ZHANG Limei(張麗梅), DU Shoujun(杜守軍), LIU Weiran(劉衛(wèi)然). Study on construction safety of management system based of extension theory[J]. China Safety Science Journal(中國(guó)安全科學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)), 2011, 21(8): 138-144.
[11] LU Lan(盧嵐), YANG Jing(楊靜), QIN Song(秦嵩). A study on the safety assessment on building sites[J]. China Civil Engineering Journal(土木工程學(xué)報(bào)), 2003, 36(9): 46-50.
[12] ZHANG Shilian(張仕廉), SANG Feng(桑鋒). Study on construction safety inherent safer system model[J]. Construction Economy(建筑經(jīng)濟(jì)), 2009, 30(6): 74-77.
[13] WEI Cuiping(魏翠萍), HOU Chengjun(侯成軍). Three new priority methods and their comparison in the uncertain type of AHP[J]. Journal of Qufu Normal University(曲阜師范大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào)), 1996, 22(2): 25-30.
[14] WEI Yiqiang(魏毅強(qiáng)), LIU Jinsheng(劉進(jìn)生), WANG Xuzhu(王緒柱). Concept of consistence and weights of the judgment matrix in the uncertain type of AHP . Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice(系統(tǒng)工程理論與實(shí)踐), 1994(4): 16-22.
[15] GAU W L, BUEHRER D J. Vague sets[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1993, 23(2): 610-614.
[16] FU Haidong(符海東), LU Zhengding(盧正鼎). Fuzzy decision making with multicriteria basedon distance of Vague sets[J]. Journal of Huazhong University: Nature Science Edition(華中科技大學(xué)學(xué)報(bào):自然科學(xué)版), 2003, 31(8): 77 79.
[17] LIU Aihua(劉愛華), SHI Shiliang(施式亮), WU Chao(吳超). The synthetic assessment for systematic safety based on Vague sets[J]. Engineering Science(中國(guó)工程科學(xué)), 2007, 9(3): 58-61.

服務(wù)于反饋：

【文章下載】【發(fā)表評(píng)論】【查看評(píng)論】【】

提示：您還未登錄，請(qǐng)登錄！

  本文關(guān)鍵詞：基于區(qū)間數(shù)AHP和Vague集的施工安全管理綜合評(píng)價(jià)，由筆耕文化傳播整理發(fā)布。