本文關(guān)鍵詞： 安全培訓(xùn) 安全意識(shí) 識(shí)別率 認(rèn)知記憶 培訓(xùn)體系　出處：《安徽工程大學(xué)》2015年碩士論文　論文類型：學(xué)位論文

【摘要】：隨著經(jīng)濟(jì)的高速發(fā)展,人們的生活水平得到了進(jìn)一步的改善,并且對安全的關(guān)注與需求也越來越高。目前,我國的安全生產(chǎn)形勢總體趨于好轉(zhuǎn),但事故總量仍然很大。對相關(guān)人員進(jìn)行有效的安全培訓(xùn),可以提高他們的安全知識(shí),增強(qiáng)他們的安全意識(shí),從而改善安全行為的表現(xiàn),是一種有效的手段。在實(shí)際的安全生產(chǎn)過程中,最關(guān)心的是人的安全行為表現(xiàn),或者說是安全行為遵守。安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)的目的是為了使人們獲得相關(guān)的安全知識(shí),從而更好的使人們提高安全行為表現(xiàn)。因此,安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)的作用是從安全事故發(fā)生的一個(gè)直接原因入手,即安全知識(shí)的匱乏。通過相應(yīng)的安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn),使人們提高安全知識(shí),促進(jìn)安全行為的遵守,從而有效地防止安全事故的發(fā)生。以往的研究表明,安全培訓(xùn)是提高人的安全知識(shí),增強(qiáng)人的安全意識(shí),改善人的安全行為表現(xiàn)的有效的手段。雖然國內(nèi)外學(xué)者對于安全標(biāo)志及其培訓(xùn)進(jìn)行了相關(guān)的研究,但是對于不同標(biāo)志培訓(xùn)方法有效性的比較研究并不多見,尤其缺少對《安全標(biāo)志及其使用導(dǎo)則》中安全標(biāo)志培訓(xùn)方法有效性的研究。本研究首先介紹了我國安全生產(chǎn)的現(xiàn)狀。從安全事故的原因分析入手,并調(diào)查安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別率的現(xiàn)狀。為了提高安全標(biāo)志的有效性,本研究以《安全標(biāo)志及其使用導(dǎo)則》中規(guī)定的103安全標(biāo)志為試驗(yàn)材料。通過安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別率試驗(yàn),篩選識(shí)別率低于50%的標(biāo)志,然后以這些標(biāo)志為試驗(yàn)材料,進(jìn)行安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)試驗(yàn)。安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)試驗(yàn)在安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別率試驗(yàn)結(jié)束的一周后進(jìn)行。培訓(xùn)試驗(yàn)選取140名被試者,平均分7組：受控組、配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、安全意識(shí)—配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、回想培訓(xùn)組、安全意識(shí)—回想培訓(xùn)組、識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組、安全意識(shí)—識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組,然后進(jìn)行試驗(yàn),7組被試同時(shí)進(jìn)行安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)對比試驗(yàn)。研究發(fā)現(xiàn)：1.配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、回想培訓(xùn)組、識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組、安全意識(shí)—配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、安全意識(shí)—回想培訓(xùn)組、安全意識(shí)—識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組6組培訓(xùn)組的識(shí)別率均顯著高于受控組的識(shí)別率,即培訓(xùn)可以顯著提高人們對于安全標(biāo)志的理解力,提高安全標(biāo)志的識(shí)別率。2.回想培訓(xùn)組和安全意識(shí)—回想培訓(xùn)組的識(shí)別率顯著高于配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、安全意識(shí)—配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組和安全意識(shí)識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組,而配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、安全意識(shí)—配對聯(lián)想學(xué)習(xí)組、回想組和安全意識(shí)識(shí)別培訓(xùn)組之間的識(shí)別率差異不顯著。3.在上述安全標(biāo)志的培訓(xùn)方式中,回想培訓(xùn)具有更高的績效。4.在培訓(xùn)前加入安全意識(shí)培訓(xùn)的三組培訓(xùn)組與不加安全意識(shí)的三組培訓(xùn)組的識(shí)別率差異不顯著。最后,分析安全標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)的原則與目的、培訓(xùn)的內(nèi)容與對象,并在此基礎(chǔ)上,結(jié)合認(rèn)知記憶相關(guān)理論,建立安全標(biāo)志培訓(xùn)體系,并提出相應(yīng)的標(biāo)志識(shí)別培訓(xùn)有效性的對策。
[Abstract]:With the rapid development of the economy, people's living standards have been further improved, and the concern and demand for safety has become higher and higher. At present, the overall situation of safety production in China tends to improve. But the total number of accidents is still very large. Effective safety training for relevant personnel can enhance their safety knowledge, enhance their safety awareness, and thus improve the performance of safety behavior. Is an effective means. In the actual production safety process, the most important concern is human safety behavior, or safety behavior compliance. The purpose of safety identification training is to enable people to acquire relevant safety knowledge. Therefore, the role of safety identification training is to start with a direct cause of safety accidents, that is, the lack of safety knowledge. To improve people's safety knowledge and to promote compliance with safety behavior, thus effectively preventing the occurrence of safety accidents. Previous studies have shown that safety training is to enhance human security knowledge and awareness. Effective means to improve the performance of human safety behavior. Although scholars at home and abroad have carried out relevant research on safety signs and their training, there are few comparative studies on the effectiveness of different marking training methods. In particular, there is a lack of research on the effectiveness of safety marking training methods in "Safety signs and their use guidelines". This study first introduces the present situation of safety production in China, starting with the analysis of the causes of safety accidents, In order to improve the effectiveness of safety marking, the 103 safety mark specified in "Safety marking and its use guidelines" was used as the test material. Screening marks with a recognition rate of less than 50% and then using them as test materials, The safety marker recognition training test was conducted one week after the end of the safety marker recognition rate test. 140 subjects were selected and divided into 7 groups on average: controlled group, matched associative learning group, Safety Awareness-pair associative Learning Group, recall training Group, Safety Awareness-recall training Group, Identification training Group, Safety Awareness-Identification training Group, The study found that: 1. Matched associative learning group, recall training group, recognition training group, safety consciousness-pair associative learning group, safety consciousness-recall training group, safety awareness-recall training group, safety awareness-recall training group, The recognition rate of the six training groups in the safety awareness training group was significantly higher than that in the controlled group, that is, training could significantly improve people's understanding of safety signs. The recognition rates of recall training group and safety awareness training group were significantly higher than those of matched association learning group, safety awareness pair association learning group, identification training group and safety awareness recognition training group, and the recognition rate of safety awareness training group was significantly higher than that of matched Lenovo learning group, safety awareness pair association learning group, identification training group and safety awareness recognition training group. However, there was no significant difference in the recognition rate between the matched associative learning group, the safety awareness-pair associative learning group, recall group and safety awareness recognition training group. 3. Recall that training has higher performance. 4. There is no significant difference between the three groups of safety awareness training group and the three groups without safety awareness training group before training. Finally, the principle and purpose of safety sign recognition training are analyzed. On the basis of the contents and objects of the training, and combined with the theory of cognitive memory, the training system of safety signs is established, and the corresponding countermeasures for the effectiveness of the training are put forward.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：安徽工程大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2015
【分類號(hào)】：X925

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前2條

1 馬慶國;王小毅;;認(rèn)知神經(jīng)科學(xué)、神經(jīng)經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)與神經(jīng)管理學(xué)[J];管理世界;2006年10期

2 趙正宣;饒培倫;劉成益;;中美兩國受試者對警示標(biāo)志反應(yīng)差異性的實(shí)例分析[J];工業(yè)工程與管理;2006年02期

，

本文編號(hào)：1526164