本文選題：非股權經營模式 + 全球價值鏈��； 參考：《天津財經大學》2014年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著科技的進步,國際分工日益細化,對全球價值鏈的管理也開始向多元化發(fā)展,越來越多的跨國公司開始將生產過程的非核心環(huán)節(jié)外包給東道國企業(yè)。非股權經營方式具有風險小、成本低、經營靈活等特點,東道國企業(yè)可以學習跨國公司先進的生產技術和管理理念,通過技術的積累,發(fā)展中國家可以不斷提升全球價值鏈上的位置。本文在國內外學者關于非股權經營模式以及全球價值鏈治理的研究成果的基礎上,首先總結了全球價值鏈的特點和影響因素以及企業(yè)參與全球價值鏈的主要方式,并且結合2011年和2013年世界投資報告的相關數(shù)據(jù),研究了非股權經營模式的主要形式和發(fā)展現(xiàn)狀；其次分別從動機的角度和全球價值鏈的管理角度兩個層面對非股權經營模式進行了分類,從動機的角度可以將非股權經營模式分為資源尋求型、效率尋求型和市場尋求型,從全球價值鏈的管理角度可以將非股權經營模式分為俘獲型、關聯(lián)型以及模塊型；在對非股權經營模式進行分類的前提下探究了非股權經營模式發(fā)展的動因以及不同類型的非股權經營模式對全球價值鏈的地位提升所產生的影響,本文的研究結果表明對于發(fā)達國家而言,非股權經營模式發(fā)展的動因是能夠減少成本、降低風險,而對于發(fā)展中國家而言,通過非股權經營模式可以更多地參與到全球價值鏈中去。非股權經營模式對價值鏈的地位提升的差異性主要體現(xiàn)在資源尋求型和市場尋求型能夠有效提高欠發(fā)達地區(qū)全球價值鏈的參與程度,并且通過技術外溢發(fā)展中國家有機會向價值鏈的高端移動,而效率尋求型的模式能夠幫助發(fā)達國家整合資源從事核心環(huán)節(jié)的生產,進而能提高經營效率；在此基礎上以合同制造和服務外包為例,將中國的非股權經營模式和全球價值鏈的分工地位分別與發(fā)達國家和發(fā)展中國家作了對比,指出了中國的非股權經營模式存在哪些不足以及在全球價值鏈上的分工地位；基于對比,對提升中國全球價值鏈分工地位提出了三點政策建議,首先將與非股權經營模式相關的政策納入到國家發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略中去,其次利用本國的技術創(chuàng)新提高在國際分工中的地位,最后通過人才培養(yǎng)從事更多的高技術活動。
[Abstract]:With the development of science and technology, the international division of labor is becoming more and more detailed, and the management of global value chain is becoming more and more diversified. More and more multinational corporations begin to outsource the non-core links in the production process to the host country enterprises. Non-equity management is characterized by low risk, low cost, flexible management, and so on. Enterprises in host countries can learn the advanced production technology and management concepts of multinational corporations, and through the accumulation of technology, Developing countries can continue to upgrade their position in global value chains. Based on the research results of non-equity management model and global value chain governance at home and abroad, this paper first summarizes the characteristics and influencing factors of global value chain and the main ways for enterprises to participate in global value chain. Combined with the data of the World Investment report in 2011 and 2013, the paper studies the main forms and development status of the non-equity business model. Secondly, it classifies the non-equity management model from the angle of motivation and the management of global value chain. From the angle of motivation, the non-equity management model can be divided into three types: resource seeking, efficiency seeking and market seeking. From the perspective of global value chain management, the non-equity management model can be divided into capture type, association type and module type; On the premise of classifying the non-equity management mode, this paper probes into the motivation of the development of the non-equity management model and the influence of different types of non-equity management mode on the status of the global value chain. The results of this paper show that for developed countries, the motivation of the development of non-equity management model is to reduce costs and risks, while for developing countries, Through the non-equity management model, we can participate more in the global value chain. The difference between non-equity management mode and value chain is that resource seeking and market seeking can effectively improve the participation of global value chain in less developed regions. And through technology spillover developing countries have the opportunity to move to the high end of the value chain, while the efficiency seeking model can help developed countries integrate resources to engage in the production of core links, and then improve the operational efficiency; On this basis, taking contract manufacturing and service outsourcing as an example, this paper compares China's non-equity management model and the division of labor status of global value chain with those of developed countries and developing countries, respectively. This paper points out the shortcomings of China's non-equity management model and its position in the global value chain, and puts forward three policy recommendations to promote the division of labor in China's global value chain based on the comparison. Firstly, the policies related to the non-equity management model are incorporated into the national development strategy, secondly, the status of international division of labor is improved by using domestic technological innovation, and finally, more high-tech activities are carried out through the cultivation of talents.
【學位授予單位】：天津財經大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2014
【分類號】：F124;F114.1

【參考文獻】

相關期刊論文 前10條

1 馮志堅;;垂直專業(yè)化的決定因素與國際貿易——基于中國工業(yè)行業(yè)數(shù)據(jù)的經驗研究[J];統(tǒng)計與信息論壇;2012年12期

2 辛娜;;我國外貿企業(yè)突破GVC低端鎖定的路徑分析[J];宜春學院學報;2012年09期

3 王仁榮;;蓬勃發(fā)展的跨國公司非實體模式(NEMs)國際化生產[J];上海經濟;2011年12期

4 馬春光;;《2011年世界投資報告》給我國餐飲連鎖企業(yè)的啟示與反思[J];企業(yè)經濟;2011年11期

5 楊偉文;豐曉;;我國國際服務外包處于價值鏈低端的影響因素研究[J];經濟經緯;2011年02期

6 郭炳南;黃太洋;;比較優(yōu)勢演化、全球價值鏈分工與中國產業(yè)升級[J];技術經濟與管理研究;2010年S2期

7 張少軍;東崗;;全球價值鏈下中國的對外貿易[J];經濟理論與經濟管理;2010年09期

8 徐禮伯;施建軍;;基于中小企業(yè)角度:非股權戰(zhàn)略聯(lián)盟中不合作行為的成因與對策[J];技術經濟與管理研究;2010年02期

9 施炳展;;中國出口產品的國際分工地位研究——基于產品內分工的視角[J];世界經濟研究;2010年01期

10 楊丹輝;;服務外包與中國產業(yè)升級:基于全球化的視角[J];當代經濟管理;2009年08期

，

本文編號：2042023