本文選題：五大發(fā)展理念 + 發(fā)展效應　； 參考：《云南財經(jīng)大學》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：隨著我國經(jīng)濟發(fā)展進入新常態(tài),地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展模式進行轉(zhuǎn)軌,經(jīng)濟增長方式進行轉(zhuǎn)變,各地區(qū)發(fā)展經(jīng)濟形態(tài)先后轉(zhuǎn)為經(jīng)濟新常態(tài)。十三五是我國全面建成小康社會的關(guān)鍵時期。黨的十八屆五中全會提出創(chuàng)新、協(xié)調(diào)、綠色、開放、共享的發(fā)展理念。由于我國各地區(qū)在歷史文化、基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施、人口素質(zhì)、生產(chǎn)力水平及國家發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略存在差異,在地區(qū)發(fā)展的質(zhì)量和效益也表現(xiàn)出較大差異。因此,新五大發(fā)展理念對于地區(qū)發(fā)展效應如何?同時,五大發(fā)展理念其內(nèi)部發(fā)展的協(xié)調(diào)性如何?五大發(fā)展理念內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)性與地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展水平關(guān)系如何?這都是本文要解決的問題。解決這些問題對著力提高地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的質(zhì)量和效益,實現(xiàn)全面建成小康社會奮斗目標,具有重要的理論意義和現(xiàn)實意義。本文首先對五大理念的理論進行分析,提出提高五大理念發(fā)展水平可以促進地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展的理論假說。要驗證這個假說,首先必須測度五大理念綜合發(fā)展水平�；趯ξ宕蟀l(fā)展理念內(nèi)涵的界定,根據(jù)指標選擇滿足的條件,以創(chuàng)新、協(xié)調(diào)、綠色、開放、共享為一級指標,選取46個二級指標來評價地區(qū)五大理念綜合發(fā)展水平。為了保證評價結(jié)果的客觀性,本文選擇主成分分析法和功效系數(shù)法對我國30個地區(qū)(西藏除外)的地方五大理念綜合發(fā)展水平進行測度評價,計算出地方五大理念綜合發(fā)展指數(shù)排名;為了使評價結(jié)果具有一致性,對兩種評價方法進行了Spearman等級相關(guān)系數(shù)檢驗,結(jié)論顯示兩種不同評價方法所得結(jié)果具有較強的相關(guān)性;綜合考慮得分與名次,在兩種評價方法的基礎(chǔ)上運用模糊Borda法再次對各地區(qū)五大理念綜合發(fā)展水平進行了組合評價,得出五大理念綜合發(fā)展指數(shù)。隨后運用耦合協(xié)調(diào)度模型對五大發(fā)展理念內(nèi)部協(xié)調(diào)性進行測度,測度結(jié)果顯示除了北京、上海、浙江、江蘇、廣東、天津這6個省市地區(qū)耦合協(xié)調(diào)度在0.6以上,其余省份都在0.6以下。最后,本文檢驗五大理念耦合協(xié)調(diào)度與地區(qū)發(fā)展水平的一致性,結(jié)果顯示,地區(qū)內(nèi)部五大理念協(xié)調(diào)性越好,地區(qū)經(jīng)濟發(fā)展越好,五大理念綜合發(fā)展指數(shù)對地區(qū)發(fā)展具有正效應,實證了本文的理論假說。最后,本文認為綠色發(fā)展理念應該是今后各地區(qū)著重貫徹實施的發(fā)展理念。同時,各地區(qū)需促進五大理念的協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展,最終達到地區(qū)質(zhì)量和效益的穩(wěn)步提升。
[Abstract]:With the economic development of our country entering the new normal, the regional economic development mode is transformed, the economic growth mode is changed, and the regional economic development pattern has been transformed into the new economic normal. The thirteenth five-year plan is the key period that our country builds well-off society in an all-round way. The Fifth Plenary session of the 18th CPC Central Committee proposed innovation, coordination, green, open, shared development concept. Because there are differences in history and culture, infrastructure, population quality, productivity level and national development strategy, the quality and benefit of regional development are also different. Therefore, what are the effects of the five new development concepts on regional development? At the same time, the five development concepts of its internal development coordination? What is the relationship between the internal coordination of the five development concepts and the level of regional economic development? These are the problems to be solved in this paper. Solving these problems is of great theoretical and practical significance for improving the quality and efficiency of regional economic development and realizing the goal of building a well-off society in an all-round way. This paper first analyzes the theories of the five ideas and puts forward the hypothesis that improving the development level of the five ideas can promote the development of regional economy. To verify this hypothesis, we must first measure the comprehensive development level of the five major ideas. Based on the definition of the connotation of the five major concepts of development, according to the conditions selected and satisfied by the indicators, and taking innovation, coordination, green, openness and sharing as the primary index, 46 secondary indicators are selected to evaluate the comprehensive development level of the five major concepts in the region. In order to ensure the objectivity of the evaluation results, this paper chooses the principal component analysis method and the efficacy coefficient method to measure and evaluate the comprehensive development level of the five local concepts in 30 regions of China (except Tibet). In order to make the evaluation results consistent, the two evaluation methods were tested with Spearman rank correlation coefficient, and the conclusions showed that the results of two different evaluation methods had strong correlation. On the basis of two evaluation methods, fuzzy Borda method is used to evaluate the comprehensive development level of five major concepts in different regions, and the comprehensive development index of five major ideas is obtained. Then the paper uses the coupling coordination degree model to measure the internal coordination of the five major development concepts. The result shows that the coupling coordination degree of the six provinces and cities except Beijing, Shanghai, Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Guangdong and Tianjin is more than 0.6. The rest of the provinces are below 0.6. Finally, this paper examines the consistency between the five major concepts' coupling and coordination degree and the level of regional development. The results show that the better the coordination of the five major concepts within the region, the better the regional economic development, and the positive effect of the five major ideas' comprehensive development index on the regional development. The theoretical hypothesis of this paper is proved. Finally, this paper believes that the green development concept should be put into practice in all regions in the future. At the same time, all regions need to promote the coordinated development of the five major concepts, and finally achieve a steady improvement of regional quality and efficiency.
【學位授予單位】：云南財經(jīng)大學
【學位級別】：碩士
【學位授予年份】：2017
【分類號】：F124

【參考文獻】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 劉鳳義;李臻;;共享發(fā)展的政治經(jīng)濟學解讀[J];中國特色社會主義研究;2016年02期

2 李楠;陳晨;;以共享發(fā)展理念引領(lǐng)農(nóng)村貧困人口實現(xiàn)脫貧[J];思想理論教育導刊;2016年03期

3 趙滿華;;共享發(fā)展的科學內(nèi)涵及實現(xiàn)機制研究[J];經(jīng)濟問題;2016年03期

4 孫敬水;林曉煒;;開放型經(jīng)濟的評價體系研究進展[J];國際經(jīng)貿(mào)探索;2016年02期

5 黃勤;林鑫;;長江經(jīng)濟帶建設(shè)的指標體系與發(fā)展類型測度[J];改革;2015年12期

6 黃新煥;王文平;蔡彬清;;我國能源—經(jīng)濟—環(huán)境系統(tǒng)協(xié)調(diào)發(fā)展評價[J];統(tǒng)計與決策;2015年09期

7 裴長洪;;經(jīng)濟新常態(tài)下中國擴大開放的績效評價[J];經(jīng)濟研究;2015年04期

8 劉煥;胡春萍;張攀;;省級政府實施創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略監(jiān)測評估——一個分析框架[J];科技進步與對策;2015年08期

9 安淑新;;“十三五”規(guī)劃指標體系設(shè)置研究[J];宏觀經(jīng)濟管理;2014年11期

10 袁崢嶸;杜霈;;我國實現(xiàn)創(chuàng)新驅(qū)動發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略的路徑分析[J];改革與戰(zhàn)略;2014年09期

，

本文編號：1990063