本文選題：教育經(jīng)濟(jì) + 硬計(jì)算方法　； 參考：《教育與經(jīng)濟(jì)》2017年03期

【摘要】：通過(guò)分析教育對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)增長(zhǎng)貢獻(xiàn)率硬計(jì)算和軟計(jì)算方法在研究中的應(yīng)用,比較兩種方法的異同和優(yōu)缺點(diǎn)。本文認(rèn)為硬計(jì)算方法得益于其較強(qiáng)的原生性和理論支撐,應(yīng)用相對(duì)成熟,不足是方法本身過(guò)于模式化,難以適應(yīng)高度非線性以及龐大復(fù)雜多變的社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)系統(tǒng),系統(tǒng)性不強(qiáng);軟計(jì)算方法比前者具有更好的自學(xué)習(xí)和自適應(yīng)能力,但尚在完善階段,其步驟繁瑣,操作復(fù)雜�；诖�,本文主要關(guān)注兩種方法的研究現(xiàn)狀、方法原理等,剖析兩種方法的差異性和優(yōu)缺點(diǎn),以期對(duì)未來(lái)的研究有所啟示。
[Abstract]:By analyzing the application of hard calculation and soft computing in the research of the contribution rate of education to economic growth, this paper compares the similarities and differences between the two methods and their advantages and disadvantages. This paper holds that the hard computing method benefits from its strong originality and theoretical support, and its application is relatively mature. The deficiency is that the method itself is too modular and difficult to adapt to the highly nonlinear and large and complex social and economic systems, and the system is not strong. The soft computing method has better self-learning and adaptive ability than the former, but it is still in the perfect stage, its steps are complicated and the operation is complicated. Based on this, this paper mainly pays attention to the current research situation and the principle of the two methods, and analyzes the differences, advantages and disadvantages of the two methods in order to enlighten the future research.
【作者單位】： 南京農(nóng)業(yè)大學(xué)公共管理學(xué)院;
【分類號(hào)】：F124
，

本文編號(hào)：1969727