本文選題：一帶一路 + 出口相似度��； 參考：《溫州大學(xué)》2017年碩士論文

【摘要】：中國在古絲綢之路基礎(chǔ)上提出的一帶一路戰(zhàn)略,是一個(gè)倡導(dǎo)和平發(fā)展、互利共贏的創(chuàng)新合作理念,也是當(dāng)前中國為打破出口貿(mào)易增速下滑這一困境的重要戰(zhàn)略對(duì)策。一帶一路戰(zhàn)略從陸路和海洋兩通道進(jìn)行貿(mào)易互通,來尋求新的出口市場(chǎng)擴(kuò)大產(chǎn)品出口。但是,由于沿線國家與中國出口結(jié)構(gòu)的類似,這就要求企業(yè)出口區(qū)域的選擇不能一概而論,需要有側(cè)重點(diǎn)。因此,在沿線國家內(nèi)貿(mào)易區(qū)位的再選擇十分值得研究。本文在背景介紹、文獻(xiàn)綜述、理論依據(jù)、首次選擇概況的基礎(chǔ)上進(jìn)行區(qū)位再選擇的實(shí)證研究。文獻(xiàn)綜述部分一方面總結(jié)當(dāng)前一帶一路的研究現(xiàn)狀,發(fā)現(xiàn)實(shí)證研究不足,尤其是以全局的視角對(duì)沿線國家的貿(mào)易分析;另一方面對(duì)出口企業(yè)區(qū)位選擇的文獻(xiàn)進(jìn)行研讀,發(fā)現(xiàn)微觀研究不足,尤其是針對(duì)不同種類產(chǎn)品的出口區(qū)位選擇。理論層面則分為國際貿(mào)易理論和馬克思的經(jīng)濟(jì)理論兩部分對(duì)中國與一帶一路沿線國家貿(mào)易競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)進(jìn)行理論性描述,為本文的區(qū)位選擇研究奠定理論基礎(chǔ)。首次概況研究則分為大西洋和太平洋兩大貿(mào)易軸,描述中國出口貿(mào)易現(xiàn)狀,為區(qū)位再次選擇提供現(xiàn)實(shí)依據(jù)。實(shí)證研究部分,分為出口相似度指數(shù)和區(qū)域顯示性比較優(yōu)勢(shì)指數(shù)兩個(gè)部分具體分析,出口相似度指數(shù)分析貿(mào)易競爭關(guān)系,區(qū)域顯示性比較優(yōu)勢(shì)指數(shù)分析競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)。實(shí)證表明中國與一帶一路沿線國家出口貿(mào)易的競爭優(yōu)勢(shì)主要表現(xiàn)在STIC[5]、STIC[6]、STIC[7]、STIC[8]這四類工業(yè)制成品上,其中勞動(dòng)密集型STIC[6]、STIC[8]兩類比資本密集型STIC[5]、STIC[7]]兩類較為顯著,貿(mào)易區(qū)位上則中東及西亞地區(qū)較為顯著,其次是東南亞地區(qū)。
[Abstract]:The Belt and Road strategy put forward by China on the basis of the ancient Silk Road is an innovative and cooperative idea that advocates peaceful development and mutual benefit, and it is also an important strategic countermeasure for China to break the predicament of declining export trade growth rate at present. Belt and Road strategy from land and sea to trade between the two channels to seek new export markets to expand the export of products. However, because the export structure of the countries along the route is similar to that of China, the choice of export regions should not be generalized and should be focused on. Therefore, the choice of trade area in the countries along the route is worth studying. On the basis of background introduction, literature review, theoretical basis and the first choice of general situation, this paper conducts an empirical study on location re-selection. The literature review part on the one hand summarizes the current research situation of Belt and Road, and finds that the empirical research is insufficient, especially the trade analysis of the countries along the route from the overall perspective; on the other hand, it studies the literature on the location choice of export enterprises. It is found that the microcosmic research is insufficient, especially the export location choice for different kinds of products. The theoretical level is divided into two parts: international trade theory and Marx's economic theory. It describes the trade competitive advantage between China and the countries along Belt and Road, and lays a theoretical foundation for the study of location choice in this paper. The first survey is divided into two major trade axes, Atlantic and Pacific, to describe the current situation of China's export trade, and to provide a realistic basis for the re-selection of location. The empirical research part is divided into two parts: export similarity index and regional display comparative advantage index, export similarity index to analyze trade competition relationship, regional display comparative advantage index to analyze competitive advantage. The empirical results show that the competitive advantage of export trade between China and countries along the Belt and Road is mainly manifested in the four kinds of manufactured goods: STIC [5] / STIC [6] / STIC [7] / STIC [8], in which the labor-intensive STIC [6] or STIC [8] is more significant than the capital-intensive STIC [5] / STIC [7]. The Middle East and West Asia are more prominent in the trade area, followed by Southeast Asia.
【學(xué)位授予單位】：溫州大學(xué)
【學(xué)位級(jí)別】：碩士
【學(xué)位授予年份】：2017
【分類號(hào)】：F752.62;F125

【參考文獻(xiàn)】

相關(guān)期刊論文 前10條

1 王麗麗;;中國對(duì)“一帶一路”沿線國家的出口潛力及影響因素分析[J];商業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)與管理;2017年02期

2 于津平;顧威;;“一帶一路”建設(shè)的利益、風(fēng)險(xiǎn)與策略[J];南開學(xué)報(bào)(哲學(xué)社會(huì)科學(xué)版);2016年01期

3 廖澤芳;寧凌;;21世紀(jì)海上絲綢之路之中國與東盟貿(mào)易暢通——基于引力模型的實(shí)證考察[J];經(jīng)濟(jì)問題;2015年12期

4 孔慶峰;董虹蔚;;“一帶一路”國家的貿(mào)易便利化水平測(cè)算與貿(mào)易潛力研究[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年12期

5 陳虹;楊成玉;;“一帶一路”國家戰(zhàn)略的國際經(jīng)濟(jì)效應(yīng)研究——基于CGE模型的分析[J];國際貿(mào)易問題;2015年10期

6 李艷芳;李波;;中國與“海上絲綢之路”沿線區(qū)域/國家的貿(mào)易聯(lián)系和貿(mào)易潛力分析[J];南亞研究季刊;2015年03期

7 竺彩華;韓劍夫;;“一帶一路”沿線FTA現(xiàn)狀與中國FTA戰(zhàn)略[J];亞太經(jīng)濟(jì);2015年04期

8 翟];;“一帶一路”建設(shè)的戰(zhàn)略思考[J];國際觀察;2015年04期

9 石建國;;“一帶一路”戰(zhàn)略研究現(xiàn)狀綜述[J];中國周邊外交學(xué)刊;2015年01期

10 公丕萍;宋周鶯;劉衛(wèi)東;;中國與“一帶一路”沿線國家貿(mào)易的商品格局[J];地理科學(xué)進(jìn)展;2015年05期

，

本文編號(hào)：1954060